Home Blog

A life in pictures: Celebrating David Attenborough at 100 – Nature

Nature

    LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook

    As the British naturalist marks a milestone birthday, we take a look at how his work has shaped science.

    By Alexia Austin and Amelia Hennighausen


    Deep in the rainforest of the Virunga Mountains in Rwanda, David Attenborough watches as a troop of mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) play in the undergrowth around him. One — a youngster — crawls onto his lap and tugs at his clothes. It is January 1978, and the cameras are rolling on a wildlife series called Life on Earth.

    Although not his first on-camera appearance, it would prove to be a defining one for the British naturalist: around 15 million viewers in the United Kingdom tuned in to watch the television series when it aired on the BBC in 1979.

    A series of three photos of David Attenborough sitting in front of the wide expanse of the Grand Canyon in the U.S.; holding two large long-legged crabs while standing in the sea; and carrying a tripod back from a shoot in Wales, UK., image

    This was a large audience at the time, but still around 9 million fewer than the most-watched UK broadcast that year (an episode of the TV show To the Manor Born).

    Since then, Attenborough’s reporting style has grown alongside advances in the science that he covers. As he celebrates his 100th birthday (on 8 May), his influence on the scientific community is greater than ever. 

    Credits: John Sparks/Nature Picture Library; BBC/Everett Collection; Nick Upton/Nature Picture Library

    “It’s impossible to overstate what Sir David Attenborough has given us. His programmes have not only defined science and natural-history broadcasting, but they have also changed how we see our planet and our place within it,” said Jack Bootle, BBC head of specialist factual commissioning, in a press release in February.

    Recounting his meeting with the gorillas in Rwanda for A Gorilla Story: Told by David Attenborough (2026). Credit: Entertainment Pictures/Alamy

    One of Attenborough’s greatest contributions to science has been in extending its reach. “People are aware of the problems of conservation in a way which could not exist without broadcasting,” the naturalist said in 2024. Attenborough found his start at the BBC as a trainee television producer in the early 1950s. In 1954, he presented Zoo Quest, a documentary series in which he found and captured animals for zoos — a common practice at the time but something he has since denounced. This marked the start of a long and distinguished career with the BBC, in which he also held executive positions overseeing the programming output of the channel BBC Two.

    Since 1954, Attenborough has contributed to more than 100 film and TV projects, including several of his own documentary series, such as the popular Blue Planet and Planet Earth franchises. He has dived wearing a bubble helmet at the North Bahama Banks in the Atlantic Ocean; 

    A series of three photos of David Attenborough in bubble helmet underwater in North Bahama Banks; standing next to a very tall giant quiver tree in South Africa; and posing with a huge colony of King Penguin chicks in South Georgia., image

    sized up to a giant quiver tree (Aloidendron pillansii) in South Africa;

    and been surrounded by king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) and their chicks on South Georgia Island in the South Atlantic, among many other covetable experiences. His overall viewership is in the multimillions.

    Credits: Peter Scoones; Neil Nightingale; Ben Osborne (Nature Picture Library)

    Fans have named their favourite on-screen moments: in a poll of 13,000 viewers in 2006, a clip of an Australian superb lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae) from Attenborough’s 1998 The Life of Birds series topped the list. The segment captured the bird mimicking the sounds it hears in the forest, including chainsaws and camera shutters.

    A large part of Attenborough’s appeal is his ability to craft simple phrases to explain the complex phenomena of the animal world. Since the turn of the millennium, he has increasingly used this style to encourage environmental protection.

    A series of two photos of David Attenborough pictured in the Maasai Mara, Kenya in 2020 and addressing the crowd from the stage at the 2019 Glastonbury Festival, UK., image

    In 2006, he studied the impact of global warming in a documentary called The Truth About Climate Change. By 2019, it was the human-made destruction of natural habitats that was under the microscope in the series Our Planet. That same year, Attenborough took to the stage at the Glastonbury Festival in Somerset, UK, to praise the event and attendees for cutting down on single-use plastic.

    Credits: Netflix/Everett Collection; David Levene/Guardian/eyevine

    His advocacy has led to tangible results off screen. After the airing of his documentary Blue Planet II in 2017 — in which some of the episodes showed marine life being harmed by plastic — there was a surge in awareness around plastic waste, something that has been referred to as the Blue Planet Effect. There were anecdotal reports of people limiting their reliance on plastic after watching the documentary. Waitrose, a British supermarket chain headquartered in Bracknell, reported an 800% increase in consumers asking about plastic use after it aired. One study, which was focused on the UK political and media landscape, showed a rise in mentions of the issue in Parliament and in the news after the show1.

    References

    1. Males, J. & Van Aelst, P. Environ. Commun. 15, 40–54 (2021).

    • Media editor: Amelia Hennighausen
    • Subeditor: Zoé Valbret

    Source: A life in pictures: Celebrating David Attenborough at 100

    Interview with Virginia Evans, 2026 PEN/Hemingway Award Winner, Part II – The Hemingway Society

    New York Times bestseller ad for The Correspondent

    Q: Please explain your concept for the novel The Correspondent.  Why did you choose to make it an epistolary novel?  How did you choose which authors to include?

    I had a book out for sale, and it wasn’t selling.  I read 84 Charing Cross Road, and I loved that book, and I thought, “I could do that.”  The Correspondent was written in a mentality that I thought no one would ever read it.  For the most part, the books that were talked about in the novel are ones I loved.

    Q:  What is the first Hemingway story or book that you read, and what do you remember from that experience?  What is your favorite story or book by Hemingway?

    I think my first was The Old Man and the Sea, and I do remember it very clearly.  I have this very strong relationship to the sea, and books with a strong connection to the water are very meaningful to me.  I read it in one day.  It was a full-body experience for me, coming out of the book and almost feeling sweaty, it was so intense. 

    Have you read The Boy from the Sea, a book which came out last year by the Irish writer Garrett Carr?   Some scenes in it are evocative of The Old Man and the Sea.

    The Old Man and the Sea is still my favorite Hemingway work. 

    Photo of Virginia Evans
    Virginia L. Evans

     Q:  Could you tell us a little about your writing process?

    I write six days a week when I’m writing.  After I finish a draft, then I’ll be talking about something else or catching up on life.  I try to block off the morning through lunch.  I’ll be quiet; I don’t see people; I’m at home.  I’m really good five days a week when the kids are at school, and Saturdays I have to try to fit it in.  I write on computer.  I also have a notebook for every novel.  I jot down all the frenetic ideas. 

    Q: Are you working on a new project at this time?  Can you tell us about it?  

    I am working on a novel set in modern times.

    Q:  Where can people keep in touch with you?

    You can reach me through my website (http://virginiaevansauthor.com) or my Instagram account (https://www.instagram.com/virginia.l.evans/).

    The PEN/Hemingway Award is supported by the Hemingway Foundation and Society, the PEN/Faulkner Foundation, the Hemingway Family, the Ucross Foundation, the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, and the Friends of the Ernest Hemingway Collection. The members of the Hemingway Society support the award through their continued membership and through their donations. For more information about the PEN/Hemingway Award, visit this link to the website of the PEN/Faulkner Society, which administers the award:  

    05/06/2026


    How to cite this blog in MLA 8: 

    Author’s Last Name, Author’s First Name. “Title of Post.”  THR Blog, The Hemingway Foundation and Society, Date blog was published, Link to blog entry (omit http:// or https://).

    Continue/Read Original Article: Interview with Virginia Evans, 2026 PEN/Hemingway Award Winner, Part II | The Hemingway Society

    Argentina investigates hantavirus outbreak on Atlantic cruise – AP News

    World News

    By  ISABEL DEBRE Updated 10:43 PM PDT, May 6, 2026

    1 of 7 | 

    Officials and experts in Argentina are scrambling to determine if their country is the source of a deadly hantavirus outbreak that has gripped an Atlantic cruise. (AP video shot Victor R. Caivano, Nico Deluca and Carlos Antilef)

    2 of 7 | 

    Daisy Morinigo and David Delgado said they initially thought their 14-year-old son had the flu when he came down with a fever and body aches. Doctors who first saw Rodrigo in the town of San Andrés de Giles sent him home with ibuprofen and orders to rest. On January 1, they rushed Rodrigo to intensive care. He died just two hours after a hantavirus test came back positive. (AP video shot by Victor R. Caivano, Nico Deluca and Carlos Antilef)

    The rural family home where Rodrigo Morinigo, who died from hantavirus in January at the age of 14, lived with his family when he contracted the illness in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    3 of 7 | 

    The rural family home where Rodrigo Morinigo, who died from hantavirus in January at the age of 14, lived with his family when he contracted the illness in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    Daisy Morinigo sits with her husband David Delgado as she speaks about their son Rodrigo Morinigo, who died in January of hantavirus, in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    4 of 7 | 

    Daisy Morinigo sits with her husband David Delgado as she speaks about their son Rodrigo Morinigo, who died in January of hantavirus, in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    David Delgado cries as he speaks about his son Rodrigo Morinigo, who died in January of hantavirus, in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    5 of 7 | 

    David Delgado cries as he speaks about his son Rodrigo Morinigo, who died in January of hantavirus, in San Andres de Giles, Argentina, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Victor R. Caivano)

    The MV Hondius cruise ship is anchored at a port in Praia, Cape Verde, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)

    6 of 7 | 

    The MV Hondius cruise ship is anchored at a port in Praia, Cape Verde, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)

    Health workers in protective gear arrive to evacuate patients from the MV Hondius cruise ship at a port in Praia, Cape Verde, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)

    7 of 7 | 

    Health workers in protective gear arrive to evacuate patients from the MV Hondius cruise ship at a port in Praia, Cape Verde, Wednesday, May 6, 2026. (AP Photo/Misper Apawu)

    Leer en español

    BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Officials and experts in Argentina are scrambling to determine if their country is the source of a deadly hantavirus outbreak that has gripped an Atlantic cruise.

    The health emergency aboard the ship that’s moored across the ocean comes as Argentina sees a surge of hantavirus cases that many local public health researchers attribute to the recently accelerating effects of climate change. Argentina, where the cruise to Antarctica departed, is consistently ranked by the World Health Organization as having the highest incidence of the rare, rodent-borne disease in Latin America.

    Higher temperatures expand the virus’ range because, in part, as it gets warmer and ecosystems change, rodents that carry the hantavirus can thrive in more places, experts say. People typically contract the virus from exposure to rodent droppings, urine or saliva.

    “Argentina has become more tropical because of climate change, and that has brought disruptions, like dengue and yellow fever, but also new tropical plants that produce seeds for mice to proliferate,” said Hugo Pizzi, a prominent Argentine infectious disease specialist. “There is no doubt that as time goes by, the hantavirus is spreading more and more.”

    A hantavirus found in South America, called the Andes virus, can cause a severe and often fatal lung disease called hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. The disease led to death in nearly a third of cases in the last year, Argentina’s Health Ministry said, up from an average mortality rate of 15 in the five years before that.

    Hantavirus usually spreads by inhaling contaminated rodent droppings and can spread person-to-person, though that is rare, according to the WHO, whose top epidemic expert said the risk to the public is low. The Andes strain only hantavirus known to spread from human to human.

    Continue/Read Original Article: Argentina investigates hantavirus outbreak on Atlantic cruise | AP News

    Science Has Found Even More Ways Coffee Is Good for You – WIRED

    By Javier Carbajal, Science, May 4, 2026 5:30 AM

    Science Has Found Even More Ways Coffee Is Good for You

    caf beneficios estudio
    Photograph: Getty Images

    Are you a fan of coffee but not sure if it’s good for you? Perhaps you’re aware of its well-known stimulant effect but aren’t sure about the other effects it has on your health. A recent study explores how regular coffee consumption influences the gut-brain axis, a bidirectional communication network that connects the digestive system with brain activity. The results reveal a highly complex interaction that goes beyond caffeine.

    “Public interest in gut health has risen hugely,” said John Cryan, coauthor of the study published this week in Nature Communications. “The relationship between digestive and mental health is also increasingly being better understood, but the mechanisms behind coffee’s effects on this gut-brain axis have remained unclear.”

    Scientists at APC Microbiome Ireland, a research center at the University of Cork, compared 31 healthy adults who regularly consume coffee with 31 non-coffee drinkers. According to the European Food Safety Authority, a “regular” coffee drinker is one who drinks between three and five cups a day, a safe and moderate intake for most people.

    The researchers also analyzed what happened when consumers suspended their intake for two weeks and then resumed it, either with caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee. This design made it possible to distinguish the effects of caffeine from the other compounds present in coffee.

    “Coffee is more than just caffeine,” said Cryan in a press release, “it’s a complex dietary factor that interacts with our gut microbes, our metabolism, and even our emotional well-being. Our findings suggest that coffee, whether caffeinated or decaffeinated, can influence health in distinct but complementary ways.”

    The Surprising Effects of Coffee

    One of the most relevant findings was that coffee consumption modifies the composition of the intestinal microbiome. In regular drinkers, changes were detected in the abundance of certain bacteria, such as Eggerthella species and Cryptobacterium curtum, suggesting that coffee favors specific microorganisms. The former are believed to contribute to gastric and intestinal acid secretion, while the latter are involved in bile acid synthesis. APC Microbiome Ireland explains that both bacteria contribute to the elimination of harmful intestinal bacteria, preventing infections.

    Read more: Science Has Found Even More Ways Coffee Is Good for You – WIRED

    Continue/Read Original Aricle: Science Has Found Even More Ways Coffee Is Good for You | WIRED

    Trump’s disapproval rating hits record high in new poll – USA Today

    Trump’s disapproval rating hits record high in new poll

    By Kathryn Palmer, USA TODAY

    May 3, 2026, Updated May 4, 2026, 7:52 a.m. ET

    President Donald Trump‘s disapproval numbers hit a record high in a new poll, the latest in a series of surveys painting a gloomy picture for the president six months out from the November midterm elections.

    The high disapproval rate came alongside souring opinions on Trump’s handling of the Iran war, the economy and cost of living, issues that the president has consistently been polling poorly on over the last few months.

    Trump’s overall approval rating in the new survey is 37%, dropping two points from the pollster’s February figures. It’s a few points higher from a recent Reuters/Ipsos poll released April 28, which put the president at a dismal 34% approval rating − a record low in that survey’s history. The New York Times’ daily average of Trump’s approval numbers is slightly higher, tracking a 39% approval and 58% disapproval as of May 3.

    The most recent survey was conducted among 2,560 U.S. adults, Apr. 24-28. The margin of error is ±2.2 percentage points.

    On the Iran war, 66% of Americans disapprove of Trump’s actions, according to the poll. Another 33% said they approve of his approach to the war.

    But the president performed worst on the subjects of inflation and cost of living, with which more than two-thirds of survey respondents said they were unhappy. His lowest rating is on perceptions of his handling of the general cost of living in the country, with a 76% disapproval and 23% approval. Following that are perceptions of Trump’s handling of inflation, of which 72% disapprove and 27% approve.

    President Donald Trump speaks to the media before boarding Air Force One for departure to Miami, Florida, at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., May 2, 2026.

    When it came to the economy overall, Trump fared slightly better, though a majority were still discontent with the president’s performance, at a 65% disapproval and 34% approval. It’s a seven-point decline since February.

    Among Republicans, Trump’s high approval remains unchanged since February, holding at 85%. However, his ratings among Republican-leaning independents reached a new low of 56%. Among independents overall, his approval rating is just 25%. Democratic approval of the president is even lower, at 5%, with another 95% disapproving of his handling of the job.

    Among registered voters in the poll, Democrats are favored more than Republicans in House elections by five points, up from a two-point edge in February and October polls.

    This story was updated to clarify that the timing of the November midterm elections is six months out.

    Kathryn Palmer is a politics reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and on X @KathrynPlmr. Sign up for her daily politics newsletter here.

    Continue/Read Original Article: Trump’s disapproval rating hits record high in new poll

    Here are the 2026 Pulitzer Prize winners – Literary Hub

    Here are the 2026 Pulitzer Prize winners.

    Literary Hub, May 4, 2026

    The winners and nominated finalists of the 2026 Pulitzer Prizes were announced today by administrator Marjorie Miller via remote video stream. The winners each take home $15,000 dollars and serious bragging rights, not to mention a ticket into a very illustrious club.

    The full list of winners and nominated finalists from the arts & letters categories is below.

    FICTION

    Winner:

    Angel Down by Daniel Kraus (Atria Books)

    Finalists:

    Audition by Katie Kitamura (Riverhead Books)

    Stag Dance by Torrey Peters (Random House)

    *

    DRAMA

    Winner:

    Liberation by Bess Wohl

    Finalists:

    Bowl EP by Nazareth Hassan

    Meet the Cartozians by Talene Monahon

    *

    HISTORY

    Winner:

    We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution by Jill Lepore (Liveright)

    Finalists:

    King of Kings: The Iranian Revolution: A Story of Hubris, Delusion and Catastrophic Miscalculation by Scott Anderson (Doubleday)

    Born in Flames: The Business of Arson and the Remaking of the American City by Bench Ansfield (W.W. Norton & Company)

    *

    BIOGRAPHY

    Winner:

    Pride and Pleasure: The Schuyler Sisters in an Age of Revolution by Amanda Vaill (Farrar, Straus and Giroux)

    Finalists:

    The Life and Poetry of Frank Stanford by James McWilliams (University of Arkansas Press)

    True Nature: The Pilgrimage of Peter Matthiessen by Lance Richardson (Pantheon)

    *

    MEMOIR

    Winner:

    Things in Nature Merely Grow by Yiyun Li (Farrar, Straus and Giroux)

    Finalists:

    I’ll Tell You When I’m Home by Hala Alyan (Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster)

    Clam Down: A Metamorphosis by Anelise Chen (One World)

    Bibliophobia by Sarah Chihaya (Random House)

    *

    POETRY

    Winner:

    Ars Poetica by Juliana Spahr (Wesleyan University Press)

    Finalists:

    I Imagine I Been Science Fiction Always by Douglas Kearney (Wave Books)

    The Intentions of Thunder by Patricia Smith (Scribner)

    *

    GENERAL NONFICTION

    Winner:

    There Is No Place for Us: Working and Homeless in America by Brian Goldstone (Crown)

    Finalists:

    A Flower Traveled in My Blood: The Incredible True Story of the Grandmothers Who Fought to Find a Stolen Generation of Children by Haley Cohen Gilliland (Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster)

    Mother Emanuel: Two Centuries of Race, Resistance, and Forgiveness in One Charleston Church by Kevin Sack (Crown)

    *

    MUSIC

    Winner:

    Picaflor: A Future Myth by Gabriela Lena Frank

    Finalists:

    In the Arms of the Beloved by Billy Childs

    American Descent by Andrew Rindfleisch

    *

    CRITICISM

    Winner:

    Mark Lamster, The Dallas Morning News

    Finalists:

    Michael J. Lewis, The Wall Street Journal

    Vinson Cunningham, The New Yorker

    *

    SPECIAL CITATION: 

    Julie K. Brown, “for her groundbreaking reporting in 2017 and 2018 that exposed Jeffrey Epstein’s systematic abuse of young women, the justice system that protected him, and, over time, his powerful network of associates and enablers.”

    See the full list of winners—including all the writers recognized for journalism, commentary, photography, graphic arts, and reportage—here. [https://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/2026]

    biography history journalism literary awards memoir novels poetry Pulitzer Prize Pulitzer Prize 2026

    Source: Literary Hub » Here are the 2026 Pulitzer Prize winners.

    The Whistleblower Who Uncovered the NSA’s ‘Big Brother Machine’ – The MIT Press Reader

    The Whistleblower Who Uncovered the NSA’s ‘Big Brother Machine’

    By: Cindy Cohn, Listen to this article

    On January 20, 2006, the front doorbell rang at the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s offices on Shotwell Street in the Mission District of San Francisco. At the time, Shotwell Street wasn’t the glamorous part of the Mission. Our offices sat between two auto repair shops, across the street from a utility substation. The sidewalk was often dotted with homeless people’s tents. At one point, San Francisco did a survey, and our block of Shotwell Street had the highest reported amount of human feces in the whole city.

    We had many people down on their luck ring that doorbell. Some were just lost. Others sought us out because they believed, quite sincerely, that the government or aliens had put a chip or magnet in their brains. We tried to be sympathetic and point them to other resources, but generally we had to turn them away.

    Because of this, it was with friendliness but some caution that our executive director, Shari Steele, answered the bell.

    “Do you folks care about privacy?” the guy asked. He was in a tan trench coat, looked to be in his early 60s, with gray hair, intense eyes, and a raspy voice.

    “Why yes, we do,” Shari answered.

    “Then I have some information for you. I am a retired AT&T technician. I know how the NSA is tapping into the internet at an AT&T facility downtown.”

    “Well, come on in.”

    Shari found EFF attorney Kevin Bankston in his tiny office. They talked for a long time. After the man left, Kevin and Lee Tien, another EFF attorney, burst into my office.

    “This guy named Mark Klein, who just came to the door, has something,” Kevin said, with more excitement than I had seen from him in a long time. I was immediately intrigued, but what they told me blew past my highest expectations.


    The backstory to Mark knocking on EFF’s door starts in 2001 with the government’s response to the horrific 9/11 attacks. The first of these was the Patriot Act.

    In the seven weeks between its introduction and passage in 2001, Lee and I stayed up countless nights trying to parse the three-inch-thick printout of the proposed legislation to identify the sections that affected the internet. We needed to understand what laws the government wanted to change, spot overreach and unconstitutionality, and marshal appropriate support or resistance where necessary.

    The draft legislation had been rolled out so quickly that we had the impression it was just sitting in an envelope on someone’s desk, with a note that read, “Open at the next crisis.” Our theory was confirmed when we saw that a good chunk of the proposed law was nearly the same package of legal changes that the FBI had tried — and failed — to push after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995.

    One big change impacting surveillance was clear: Prior to September 11, the U.S. had what could reasonably be called a “wall” separating foreign surveillance for national security purposes done by the NSA from domestic surveillance for law enforcement purposes done by the FBI. The theory was that those powers would never be turned on in the U.S. and used against its own people. The Patriot Act, however, helped erode that wall.

    “Do you folks care about privacy?”

    Soon, folks at EFF started to hear whispers of mass domestic surveillance programs. We were told confidentially that the NSA was gathering all the telephone records from America’s leading telecommunications companies. We separately heard that the NSA was now sitting on the wire in the U.S. We even heard that the agency was collecting metadata on our online activities from both telecommunications companies and some internet companies. Friends in the industry would say things like, “You wouldn’t believe what the NSA is doing in the United States now,” and “I can’t tell you anything without getting in trouble, but it’s massive.”

    All sounded wildly illegal under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Patriot Act. Several people reached out to us, and each time we sat down with them to see if we had enough provable facts to bring a case. But no one who reached out to talk to us was willing to go on the record, much less provide documentary evidence we could use in court.

    Continue/Read Original Article: The Whistleblower Who Uncovered the NSA’s ‘Big Brother Machine’ | The MIT Press Reader

    Warnock: Supreme Court dealt ‘devastating blow’ to democracy with Voting Rights Act ruling – POLITICO

    0

    Warnock: Supreme Court dealt ‘devastating blow’ to democracy with Voting Rights Act ruling

    The Georgia Democrat said he hopes for Congress to reinstate the law’s original pre-clearance requirements for certain states.

    Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) holds a press conference on Capitol Hill about the Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act decision on Wednesday. | Rod Lamkey Jr./AP

    By Jacob Wendler, 05/03/2026 01:06 PM EDT

    The court ruled 6-3 on Wednesday to significantly narrow a key provision of the 1965 law, deciding that there must be evidence or at least “a strong inference” of discriminatory intent in the drawing of legislative lines to prove that a map unfairly discriminates against minority voters.

    “What happened this week is nothing less than a massive and devastating blow — not only to our democracy, but particularly to people of color in the South,” Warnock said during an appearance on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “This question about intent is on its head misleading, and it ignores our history.”

    He noted that the racial turnout gap has widened, particularly in states previously covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, since the Supreme Court struck down the law’s requirement that certain states with a history of discriminatory voting practices seek “preclearance” in the 2013 ruling Shelby County v. Holder.

    “Since they removed the protections of Section 5, states that used to play old games, they’re playing new games,” he told host Margaret Brennan. “They’re 21st-century Jim Crow tactics in new clothes: moving voter polls, closing polls in Black and brown communities … purging people — people literally showing up and not knowing that their names have been purged from the rolls. And the data shows that this disproportionately impacts Black and brown citizens.”

    Warnock told Brennan he hopes for Congress to reinstate the VRA’s original pre-clearance requirement for some Southern states.

    It’s not yet clear how the ruling will impact this year’s midterm elections, with primary voting already underway in several states, but Republicans are already calling for Southern states to redraw their congressional maps as soon as possible. Louisiana’s governor issued an emergency order to halt primary voting on House races.

    Warnock — one of five Black senators — said he supports the redistricting efforts undertaken by Democrats across the country in response to the GOP’s attempts to redraw congressional maps in Texas and other states ahead of the upcoming midterms elections, but he warned that “the court sadly poured fuel on this redistricting arms race.”

    “I actually hate partisan gerrymandering. I don’t like gerrymandering, but we could not unilaterally disarm,” Warnock said. “[Trump] called Texas and said, literally, ‘Give me six more seats.’ So California and other states had to respond, Virginia in kind.”

    Warnock introduced legislation alongside Sens. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Angus King (I-Maine) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) to ban partisan gerrymandering last year. The legislation faces slim chances of success in the Senate amid Republican opposition to a partisan gerrymandering ban.

    Filed Under: U.S. Supreme Court, Redistricting, Voting Rights Act, Midterm Elections, Raphael Warnock, 2026 Elections

    Source: Warnock: Supreme Court dealt ‘devastating blow’ to democracy with Voting Rights Act ruling – POLITICO

    Aging Together: Rethinking Programming for Older Adults – Public Libraries Online

    Aging Together: Rethinking Programming for Older Adults

    PLA logo on a blue background - half circle of dots around the words PLA 2026 Conference in black

    By Victoria Brander, Educational and Literacy Librarian, Orange City Public Library; vbrander@orangecitylibrary.org on May 3, 2026

    In early April, I had the pleasure of attending PLA’s 2026 conference as a scholarship recipient. The session I chose to focus on was Aging Together: Library Programming for Older Adults. I was drawn to this panel because I work to provide programming for all ages and am looking to improve the quality of our adult programming. The presenters offered both a comprehensive overview of what matters in programming for older adults and a wide range of ideas that libraries of all sizes and budgets can implement.

    The panel began with introductions from the four presenters, who shared their roles and experience with adult programming. Three of the panelists specialize in adult services: Janie Hermann, Amy DelPo, and Witt Salley. Rosanna McGinnis, a library director, also contributed her perspective.

    Once their backgrounds were established, the panelists outlined several key considerations for planning and evaluating programming for older adults. They emphasized the importance of participants feeling that their needs and interests will be met, with a strong focus on building consistent community. When programs are offered at a regular time and place, participants are more likely to attend and continue attending.

    Older adults also look to the library for practical, applicable learning opportunities. The panelists encouraged us to consider what types of knowledge and skills this group may need, including digital literacy, technology assistance, estate planning, and access to healthcare information. These topics can also support intergenerational programming, pairing teens or younger adults with older adults in mutually beneficial ways. Younger participants can assist with technology, while older adults can serve as mentors and share their experiences.

    When evaluating programs, the panelists recommended first identifying clear goals and desired outcomes. Specific and measurable goals should be developed alongside each program. Outcomes related to personal growth or reflection can be assessed through self-evaluation rather than formal surveys, offering a simple and effective way to gather feedback. Staff observations and anecdotal stories can also provide valuable insight into whether goals are being met.

    Accessibility was another key theme. When selecting a location, it is important to ensure wheelchair access. Promotional materials should use large, easy-to-read type. Building in time for socialization at the beginning of programs can also help ensure that late arrivals do not miss important content.

    Overall, this session provided me with a wealth of tools and ideas to strengthen our programming for older adults. Each panelist offered thoughtful insights and practical suggestions. I am excited to begin implementing these ideas in my library.


    Tags: pla2026scholarship

    Continue/Read Original Article: Aging Together: Rethinking Programming for Older Adults – Public Libraries Online

    Ranked: America’s Top Non-Ivy League Universities – Visual Capitalist

    Maps

    Ranked: America’s Top Non-Ivy League Universities

    Published 5 days ago, on April 29, 2026

    By Gabriel Cohen

    Design, by Miranda Smith

    See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

      Ranked: America’s Top Non-Ivy League Universities

      See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

      Key Takeaways

      • MIT and Stanford rank ahead of every Ivy League university in the 2026 QS World University Rankings.
      • California has three of the top five non-Ivy schools: Stanford, Caltech, and UC Berkeley.
      • Public universities make up a major part of the list, including UC Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, and Purdue.

      The Ivy League is often shorthand for elite higher education in the U.S., but many of America’s highest-ranked universities sit outside that group.

      Two non-Ivy schools, MIT and Stanford, rank ahead of every Ivy League university in the 2026 QS World University Rankings.

      This graphic ranks the top 25 non-Ivy League universities in the U.S. using 2026 data from QS World University Rankings, which scores universities based on academic reputation, research, employability, sustainability, and global engagement.

      Surpassing the Ivy Leagues

      MIT and Stanford are the clearest examples of how U.S. academic prestige extends beyond the Ivy League. Both rank ahead of every Ivy League university in the 2026 QS World University Rankings, with MIT earning a perfect score of 100 and Stanford scoring 98.9.

      The following data table lists non-Ivy League universities in the U.S. alongside their QS score for 2026. entries per pageSearch:

      RankUniversityStateScore
      1MITMassachussetts100
      2Stanford UniversityCalifornia98.9
      3CaltechCalifornia94.3
      4University of ChicagoIllinois93
      5UC BerkeleyCalifornia91.2
      6Johns HopkinsMaryland89.7
      7Northwestern UniversityIllinois85.1
      8University of Michigan-Ann ArborMichigan84.7
      9UCLACalifornia84.4
      10Carnegie Mellon UniversityPennsylvania82.3
      11New York UniversityNew York81.1
      12Duke UniversityNorth Carolina79
      13UC San DiegoCalifornia76.9
      14UT AustinTexas76.4
      15University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignIllinois75.9

      Showing 1 to 15 of 25 entries

      Decades of academic excellence have turned MIT and Stanford into intellectual centers that power their regions. More than 100 MIT alumni have gone on to win the Nobel Prize, and the university is best known for its contributions to engineering, science, and technology.

      Meanwhile, Stanford played a key role in the mid-20th-century creation of Silicon Valley in the Bay Area. Its alumni include the presidents of six countries and multiple Supreme Court justices.

      California’s Clear Concentration

      California has the strongest showing of any state in the ranking, led by Stanford, Caltech, UC Berkeley, and UCLA. This concentration reflects the state’s mix of private research powerhouses and major public universities.

      The UC system spans 10 campuses across the state and serves roughly 300,000 students. In addition to UC Berkeley, the Los Angeles (84.4), San Diego (76.9), and Davis (66.3) campuses are also world-renowned for their academic rigor and contributions to both STEM fields and the social sciences.

      Alongside high-research universities like Caltech, the UC system has helped shape California’s reputation as a center of intellectual rigor and entrepreneurship.

      Major Schools in the Midwest

      While regions west of the Mississippi River have relatively few leading universities outside of Texas, Illinois anchors another hub of major non-Ivy colleges, especially around its largest city.

      The University of Chicago (93) is the fourth-best non-Ivy school in the country. Founded by John D. Rockefeller in 1890, it served throughout the 20th century as a key center for law, nuclear research, chemistry, and political economy. Meanwhile, Northwestern University (85.1), located in the Chicago suburb of Evanston, counts nearly 50 Pulitzer Prize winners among its alumni.

      Outside the Chicago area, the Midwest is home to leading universities such as the University of Michigan (84.7), Purdue University (71.1), and the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (75.9).

      Learn More on the Voronoi App

      To learn more about this topic, check out the The U.S. Dominates the World University Ranking on Voronoi.

      Continue/Read Original Article: Ranked: America’s Top Non-Ivy League Universities

      Why ProPublica Is Suing the Department of Education – ProPublica

      Why We Are Suing the Department of Education

      The Office for Civil Rights is keeping the public in the dark on which schools it’s investigating and why.

      by Charles Ornstein, April 30, 2026, 5:00 am

      ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. This story first ran in Dispatches, our weekly newsletter from our reporters about their recent investigations. Sign up to receive stories like this one in your inbox every Saturday.

      Every Tuesday, almost like clockwork, the U.S. Department of Education would update a public list of schools and colleges it was investigating for possible violations of students’ civil rights.

      Every Tuesday, that is, until Jan. 14, 2025, six days before President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term. Today, that online list remains as it was that week before inauguration: frozen in time.

      My colleagues Jodi Cohen and Jennifer Smith Richards, both longtime education reporters, used that list regularly in their work. “You would get a call or a tip about a school district, and you would go and look up the school district to see if it was under investigation,” Cohen told me recently.

      The data also allowed the public to spot patterns in what types of investigations were being opened and where, Smith Richards said. 

      For decades, the Office for Civil Rights has worked to uphold students’ constitutional rights against discrimination based on disability, race, national origin and gender. Now, without a publicly accessible way to track the office’s investigations, journalists, education watchdogs and parents could be left in the dark. 

      Early last year, Cohen and Smith Richards reached out to sources inside the Department of Education. They learned the department had significantly cut back its efforts to investigate some types of discrimination in schools.

      They published a story about how the department, under the Trump administration, is now focused on investigations relating to curbing antisemitism, ending participation of transgender athletes in women’s sports and combating alleged discrimination against white students. Complaints about transgender students playing sports and using girls’ bathrooms at school had been fast-tracked while cases of racial harassment of Black students last year were ignored.

      Read more: Why ProPublica Is Suing the Department of Education – ProPublica

      Continue/Read Original Article: Why ProPublica Is Suing the Department of Education — ProPublica

      Roy Williams shares wisdom with Carolina seniors – UNC-Chapel Hill

      Campus Life

      Roy Williams shares wisdom with Carolina seniors

      Photos by Johnny Andrews, University Communications and Marketing, Monday, May 4th, 2026

        Roy Williams is a basketball legend, a three-time national championship-winning head coach and, of course, a proud Carolina alumnus.

        “You are a graduate of the University of North Carolina — it doesn’t get any better,” Williams ’72, ’73 (MA) told the Class of 2026 May 1 while delivering the Last Lecture, part of Carolina Alumni’s Senior Week, on Polk Place in front of Wilson Library.

        Williams retired in 2021 after coaching Carolina men’s basketball for 18 seasons, leading the Tar Heels to national titles in 2005, 2009 and 2017. He also served as an assistant coach to Dean Smith for 10 seasons from 1978-88 before coaching the University of Kansas for 15 seasons.

        Soon-to-be Tar Heel graduates heard Williams offer life lessons, words of encouragement and reflections from on and off the court.

        Check out photos from Williams’ speech and click to enlarge.

        View of Roy Williams speaking to Carolina seniors at the Last Lecture with students seated on the lawn of Polk Place.

        Class of 2026 – More than 7,100 Tar Heels will celebrate their accomplishments at Spring Commencement on May 9. See more at: https://www.unc.edu/story/meet-the-class-of-2026/

        Read more stories →Categories Alumni, Athletics, Campus Life, Must-See UNC

        Continue/Read Original Source: Roy Williams shares wisdom with Carolina seniors | UNC-Chapel Hill

        A Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Voting Rights – The New York Times

        April 30, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ET

        Hosted by Michael Barbaro, Featuring Adam Liptak and Nick Corasaniti, Produced by Alex Stern and Jessica Cheung.

        Edited by Devon Taylor, Rob Szypko and Liz O. Baylen, With Michael Benoist, Contains music by Dan Powell, Rowan Niemisto and Marion Lozano, Engineered by Alyssa Moxley.


        On Wednesday, the Supreme Court dealt what may be a final blow to the landmark Voting Rights Act when it struck down Louisiana’s voting map as unconstitutional.

        Adam Liptak explains the legal logic of the ruling, and Nick Corasaniti talks about how the decision will reshape American democracy.


        On Today’s Episode

        Adam Liptak, the chief legal affairs correspondent of The New York Times and the host of The Docket, a newsletter on legal developments.

        Nick Corasaniti, a New York Times reporter covering national politics, with a focus on voting and elections.

        A voting booth with the American flag on it.
        A Supreme Court ruling could create a chaotic scramble among states that are considering drawing new congressional maps before November.Credit…Angelina Katsanis for The New York Times

        The audio of the Daily is embedded below. –DrWeb

        Background Reading


        Listen to and Follow ‘The Daily’

        Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | YouTube | iHeartRadio

        Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

        Continue/Read Original Article: A Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Voting Rights – The New York Times

        Take a trip on Route 66: still delivering kicks after 100 years | Road trips – The Guardian

        Take a trip on Route 66: still delivering kicks after 100 years

        The US’s most famous road celebrates its centenary. The 2,400-mile highway crosses eight states and three time zones from Chicago to LA

        By Susan Montoya Bryan/AP, Mon 27 Apr 2026 02.00 EDT

        The Mother Road, as the author John Steinbeck called it, has evolved over the years from an escape for poor farmers fleeing the devastating dust storms of the 1930s to perhaps the quintessential American road trip route that’s still delivering kicks.

        Although there have been faster and more direct routes between the nation’s second and third largest cities for some time, Route 66’s neon still burns brightly and its vintage signs beckon travellers to restored motor lodges, classic diners and roadside attractions.

        Each stop turns the wheels of the imagination, leaving travellers to contemplate what life was like for the people and communities that have made the road hum over the years.

        Chicago has long been one of the country’s economic engines, with access to international waters and railroads that linked all corners of the country. In the 1920s, the Oklahoma businessman Cyrus Avery, who became known as the “father of Route 66”, knew it wouldn’t be long before automobiles would dominate the transportation landscape, and thought the Windy City would be the perfect place to start the journey he envisioned.

        A member of the federal highway board appointed to map the US highway system, Avery opted to go with the number 66. He knew those double digits were ripe for marketing and could be seared into the minds of motorists.

        For some travellers, the journey is fuelled more by the food than the scenery, and there’s plenty to choose from – slices of homemade pie, thick shakes, cheeseburgers and an assortment of fried delights.

        The Cozy Dog Drive In in Springfield, the Illinois capital, is one of the many diners that sprang up along Route 66, and its breaded hotdogs on a stick have stood the test of time.

        The third-generation owner, Josh Waldmire, says the recipe is a secret. Waldmire’s grandfather Ed saw the concoction’s potential as fast and convenient road food and developed a system for frying the dogs vertically.

        Route 66 has its share of twists and turns, and it’s no surprise that a highway famous for its quirky roadside attractions would cross the nation’s most famous river on one of the more peculiar bridges known to modern engineering.

        As the road nears St Louis, the mile-long (1.6km) Chain of Rocks Bridge hovers more than 60ft (18 metres) above the Mississippi River, taking a 22-degree turn in the middle.

        Engineers eventually built a straighter, higher-speed option, and a poor resale market spared the original bridge from the scrapheap. Today it’s reserved for pedestrians and cyclists.

        A median in Missouri is home to the Route 66 Neon Park in St Robert, which features orphaned neon signs that once beckoned travellers to stop at certain sites and businesses along the highway. Often handcrafted, they weren’t only markers for motels, cafes and gas stations, but were also folk art and symbols of local culture.

        Editor’s Note: Many photos on the original site, and I could not add them here. View online in the article. –DrWeb

        Continue/Read Original Article: Take a trip on Route 66: still delivering kicks after 100 years | Road trips | The Guardian

        Ranked: U.S. Cities by Share of Income Spent on Food and Housing – Visual Capitalist

        Ranked: U.S. Cities by Share of Income Spent on Food and Housing

        Published 3 days ago, on April 26, 2026

        By Dorothy Neufeld

        Design

        See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

        Use This Visualization

        Ranked: U.S. Cities by Share of Income Spent on Food and Housing

        See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

        Key Takeaways

        • In San Diego and Miami, nearly half of income goes to food and housing.
        • Sun Belt cities like Orlando and Tampa now exceed one-third of income on essentials.
        • High wages in San Jose cut the cost burden to just 18.3%, the lowest in the dataset.

        How much of your income goes to basic living costs?

        This chart ranks major U.S. cities by the share of income spent on food and housing for a single adult in 2025, based on data from the Urban Stress Index, along with market rents and Numbeo food prices.

        In the most expensive cities, the burden is steep. San Diego tops the list at 47%, meaning nearly half of income goes toward just these two categories. By contrast, in San Jose, that share drops to 18.3%—showing how higher wages can offset even the highest costs.

        Where Cost of Living Hits Hardest

        San Diego (47%) and Miami (45.4%) stand out as the most strained cities, where food and housing alone consume nearly half of income. In both metros, rent growth continues to outpace wage gains, while strong population inflows in Miami are keeping housing demand elevated.

        The pressure isn’t limited to coastal hubs. In Florida, Orlando and Tampa both exceed 34% of income, highlighting how affordability challenges have spread to fast-growing Sun Belt cities once seen as lower-cost alternatives.

        This table shows the share of income spent on food and housing for a single adult in each city, based on market-rate one-bedroom rents and Numbeo food price indices. entries per pageSearch:

        RankCityShare of Income Spent on Food and Housing
        1San Diego, CA47.0%
        2Miami, FL45.4%
        3Boston, MA38.3%
        4Los Angeles, CA38.1%
        5Orlando, FL37.7%
        6Boise, ID36.1%
        7Tampa, FL34.4%
        8Atlanta, GA34.3%
        9New York, NY34.1%
        10Washington, DC33.7%
        11Chicago, IL33.5%
        12Madison, WI32.2%
        13Kansas City, MO31.6%
        14Portland, OR30.6%
        15Nashville, TN30.6%
        16Charlotte, NC30.5%
        17Pittsburgh, PA29.6%
        Dataset Average30.9%

        Showing 1 to 17 of 33 entries

        Boston and Los Angeles remain firmly in the “stretched” category, where over a third of income goes to basics. Notably, cost burdens in these metros exceed those in New York City, despite the Big Apple having the second-highest rental costs in the country.

        The Cities Where Income Goes Furthest

        At the other end of the spectrum, San Jose flips the equation. Despite some of the highest prices in the country, residents spend just 18.3% of income on food and housing, less than half the burden seen in San Diego.

        Beyond the tech hub, other relatively affordable cities include:

        • Detroit: 23%
        • San Francisco: 23%
        • Houston: 25.5%
        • Austin: 26.2%

        San Francisco’s presence here is especially notable. While prices are among the highest in the U.S., incomes are also elevated enough to reduce relative strain. Additionally, rent prices have increased just 2% since 2021, among the slowest rates across major U.S. cities.

        Read more: Ranked: U.S. Cities by Share of Income Spent on Food and Housing – Visual Capitalist

        Continue/Read Original Article: Ranked: U.S. Cities by Share of Income Spent on Food and Housing

        A Redistricting Check-in at the Dawn of the Callais Era – Sabato’s Crystal Ball

        0

        A Redistricting Check-in at the Dawn of the Callais Era

        Author Kyle Kondik, Published on: , Published in:2026 House

        KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE

        — The U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-awaited Callais decision on Wednesday. The decision may or may not have a major, immediate impact on 2026, but its ripple effects will be felt more deeply in subsequent elections.

        Callais also guarantees that the mid-decade redistricting battle of 2025-2026 will continue into 2027-2028.

        — As we await the Callais fallout, we already have seen a huge amount of mid-decade redistricting this cycle. These states with redrawn maps account for nearly 40% of all of the nation’s House seats.

        — Amazingly, though, the median House seat by 2024 presidential margin is actually the same as it was before any states redrew.

        — However, it wouldn’t be accurate to say that nothing has changed. The number of truly competitive seats as well as the number of truly uncompetitive seats have both declined.

        Redistricting after Callais and the dominoes yet to fall

        On Wednesday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in the Callais case, which deals with Section Two of the Voting Rights Act and its protections for majority-minority districts. This 6-3 ruling from the court’s conservative bloc deals specifically with the recent creation of a second majority-Black Democratic district in Louisiana, but it will have ripple effects far beyond the bayou.

        The Callais decision appears to limit Section Two in such a way that it may effectively no longer protect the existence of majority-minority districts.

        It was not immediately crystal clear whether the ruling would pave the way for Republican-controlled states to redraw and eliminate majority or plurality Black districts that elect Democrats in the South, although that very well could be the ultimate effect. Examples of these kinds of districts include two in Louisiana—the state at the center of the decision—two in Alabama, one in Mississippi, one in Tennessee, and one in South Carolina. All five Democratic-held seats in Georgia are majority-Black by population, although Georgia is such a competitive state that Republicans could chip away at some of those seats but not all of them. Florida, meanwhile, is on the verge of adopting a new Republican-drawn gerrymander that seemed to anticipate the Callais decision.

        The primary filing deadline is closed in all of these states except Florida, and Mississippi has already held its primary. Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana have their primaries in May. Louisiana could, as one source suggested, revert to its traditional “jungle primary” held in November (with a later runoff in races where no one wins a majority) to give itself time to draw a new map. Early voting for the May 16 primary there begins Saturday. Early voting has already started in Georgia.

        It certainly appears possible, perhaps even likely, that these Republican states will be able to draw out all or some of their Democratic-held seats, if not in 2026 than 2028.

        Louisiana will be an early test, particularly if they attempt to redraw for this year and push back their congressional primary. Do they just change LA-6 back into a Republican-leaning seat, which was the status quo before a court ruling forced its creation in advance of the 2024 election, or do they go further, targeting that district as well as the New Orleans-based LA-2? Likewise, does Tennessee eliminate TN-9, a Memphis-based majority Black district? While the filing deadline there was in early March, the primary is not until August. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) immediately called for a redraw, tweeting out an image of a hypothetical 9-0 Republican Tennessee map (the state is 8-1 Republican now, and Blackburn is running for governor).

        If those states make these moves and federal courts do not intervene, protections for these kinds of districts will be verifiably dead—something that liberal Justice Elena Kagan already suggests is the case, writing in her dissent that “Today’s decision renders Section 2 all but a dead letter.”

        Everyone wants to know what impact this will have on 2026. The reality is that it’s hazy—we will have to see how states actually react to the decision.

        But let’s remember that this ruling was issued during a time of “maximum warfare” on redistricting, a phrase House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) used recently, echoing the wording from an unidentified person close to the president quoted in an August 2025 New York Times report on the White House’s redistricting efforts.

        Given the overall redistricting environment, we would expect Republicans to push hard where they have the opportunity to do so, be it for 2026 or beyond. Expect the unexpected, and don’t assume that doors that seem closed for 2026 will remain closed. We’ll know more in the coming days as states react to this ruling.

        The other thing this ruling guarantees—which seemed very likely to be the case anyway—is that the redistricting fight of 2025-2026 will spill into 2027-2028. Beyond reckoning with Callais, states that opted not to redistrict in 2026, such as Indiana on the Republican side or Maryland on the Democratic side, could try again in 2028. States with court-drawn maps, most notably Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, could redraw if one side wins control of the governorship and state legislature. Democratic-run states constrained by commission-based redistricting systems could try to override them with the help of the voters, as we saw in California and Virginia. They may face added pressure to do so to keep up with what very well could be a post-Callais Republican windfall in the South, and Callais likely means fewer constraints on Democratic linedrawers too (although they will face intraparty pressure not to dilute minority voting strength, particularly as it is being diluted elsewhere).

        On and on we go.

        With the caveat that this is going to change, we thought Virginia adopting a new map and Florida being on the verge of adopting one was a good time to check in on the overall redistricting picture. As you could probably guess, we crunched these numbers before the Callais decision came out, but they’re interesting enough that we thought we’d share them anyway and then update them later on as needed.

        A major caveat: The dust has not yet settled on some new maps. There are still legal questions about whether the new maps in Florida (designed to allow Republicans to win up to four new seats once it is signed into law by the governor after the legislature approved it Wednesday), Missouri (designed to allow Republicans to win an extra seat), and Virginia (designed to allow Democrats to win up to four new seats) will actually be used this year. Obviously if any of these states revert back to their old maps, it’ll change the observations that follow.

        And then there are the eventual ramifications of Callais, which could lead to further district changes in advance of this year’s election. If those changes occur, today’s assessment may provide a starting point to see how Callais, specifically, changed the House dynamics following all of the redistricting we already saw before the decision.

        As we are writing right now, on the afternoon of Wednesday, April 29, eight states have drawn new district lines for the 2026 election or were on the verge of doing so (Florida). This includes the three most populous states—California, Texas, and Florida—along with Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Utah, and Virginia.

        These states account for nearly 40% of all of the nation’s House districts.

        Continue/Read Original Article: A Redistricting Check-in at the Dawn of the Callais Era – Sabato’s Crystal Ball

        “Cognitive surrender” leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds – Ars Technica

        I (cognitively) surrender

        “Cognitive surrender” leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds

        Experiments show large majorities uncritically accepting “faulty” AI answers.

        By Kyle Orland – Apr 3, 2026 2:06 PM | 286

        Artist’s conception of an average AI user’s image of an LLM’s ultra-rational thought process. Credit: Getty Images

        When it comes to large language model-powered tools, there are generally two broad categories of users. On one side are those who treat AI as a powerful but sometimes faulty service that needs careful human oversight and review to detect reasoning or factual flaws in responses. On the other side are those who routinely outsource their critical thinking to what they see as an all-knowing machine.

        Recent research goes a long way to forming a new psychological framework for that second group, which regularly engages in “cognitive surrender” to AI’s seemingly authoritative answers. That research also provides some experimental examination of when and why people are willing to outsource their critical thinking to AI, and how factors like time pressure and external incentives can affect that decision.

        Just ask the answer machine

        In “Thinking—Fast, Slow, and Artificial: How AI is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender,” researchers from the University of Pennsylvania sought to build on existing scholarship that outlines two broad categories of decision-making: one shaped by “fast, intuitive, and affective processing” (System 1); and one shaped by “slow, deliberative, and analytical reasoning” (System 2). The onset of AI systems, the researchers argue, has created a new, third category of “artificial cognition” in which decisions are driven by “external, automated, data-driven reasoning originating from algorithmic systems rather than the human mind.”

        In the past, people have often used tools from calculators to GPS systems for a kind of task-specific “cognitive offloading,” strategically delegating some jobs to reliable automated algorithms while using their own internal reasoning to oversee and evaluate the results. But the researchers argue that AI systems have given rise to a categorically different form of “cognitive surrender” in which users provide “minimal internal engagement” and accept an AI’s reasoning wholesale without oversight or verification. This “uncritical abdication of reasoning itself” is particularly common when an LLM’s output is “delivered fluently, confidently, or with minimal friction,” they point out.

        To measure the prevalence and effect of this kind of cognitive surrender to AI, the researchers performed a number of studies based on Cognitive Reflection Tests. These tests are designed to elicit incorrect answers from participants that default to “intuitive” (System 1) thought processes, but to be relatively simple to answer for those who use more “deliberative” (System 2) thought processes.

        Test subjects who consulted AI were overwhelmingly willing to accept its answers without scrutiny, whether correct or not. Credit: Shaw and Nave

        For their experiments, the researchers provided participants with optional access to an LLM chatbot that had been modified to randomly provide inaccurate answers to the CRT questions about half the time (and accurate answers the other half). The researchers hypothesized that users who frequently consulted the chatbot would let those incorrect answers “override intuitive and deliberative processes,” hurting their overall performance and highlighting the dangers of cognitive surrender.

        In one study, an experimental group with access to this modified AI consulted it for help with about 50 percent of the presented CRT problems. When the AI was accurate, those AI users accepted its reasoning about 93 percent of the time. When the AI was randomly “faulty,” though, those users still accepted the AI reasoning a lower (but still high) 80 percent of the time, showing that the mere presence of the AI frequently “displaced internal reasoning,” according to the researchers.

        Unsurprisingly, the AI-using experimental group did much better than the “brain-only” control group when the AI provided accurate answers, and much worse than the control when the AI was inaccurate. Significantly, though, the group that used AI scored 11.7 percent higher on a measure of their own confidence in their answers, even though the LLM provided wrong answers half the time.

        In another study, adding incentives (in the form of small payments) and immediate feedback for correct answers increased the likelihood that participants successfully overruled the faulty AI by 19 percentage points relative to the baseline, showing that salient consequences can encourage AI users to spend extra time verifying responses. But adding time pressures in the form of a 30-second timer decreased that tendency to correct the faulty AI by 12 percentage points, suggesting to the researchers that “when decision time is scarce, the internal monitor detecting conflict and recruiting deliberation is less likely to trigger.”

        Read more: “Cognitive surrender” leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds – Ars Technica

        Continue/Read Original Article: “Cognitive surrender” leads AI users to abandon logical thinking, research finds – Ars Technica

        Charles calls for rededication to unity amid strain in U.S.-U.K. ties – Los Angeles Times

        Politics

        King Charles is the second British monarch to address Congress, but tensions shadow the moment

        Two men in dark suits, one with a pale blue tie, the other red, walking near a partially visible woman in white hat and dress
        Ana Ceballos

        By Ana Ceballos, Staff Writer Follow, April 28, 2026 Updated 1:19 PM PT

        • King Charles III is the second British monarch to address Congress in a joint session, following his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, in 1991. He talked about the need to support European alliances at a time of “great uncertainty.”

        WASHINGTON — King Charles III addressed a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, delivering a carefully worded speech that threaded two of his most deeply held causes — climate action and the defense of Europe — to a roomful of people deeply divided on both.

        The king’s address to Congress, only the second in history by a British monarch, was intended to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence. But the timing of his remarks carried a subtle, diplomatic urgency as he spoke about the need to support European alliances at a time of “great uncertainty.”

        “I pray with all my heart that our alliance will continue to defend our shared values, with our partners in Europe and the Commonwealth, and across the world, and that we ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward-looking,” the king told the room.

        A man with gray hair, in a dark gray suit and blue tie, stands at a lectern in front of two men in dark suits and red ties

        He emphasized that “America’s words carry weight and meaning” and that the United States’ actions “matter even more,” remarks that drew affirmations from the crowd.

        In prepared remarks, the king called on Republican leaders to support Ukraine and to maintain America’s commitment to NATO, which President Trump has repeatedly derided and threatened to leave.

        “From the depths of the Atlantic to the disastrously melting ice caps of the Arctic, the commitment and expertise of the United States armed forces and its allies lie at the heart of NATO, pledged to each other’s defense, protecting our citizens and interests, keeping North Americans and Europeans safe from our common adversaries,” he said.

        The king reminded Congress that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization came to the assistance of the United States in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and said the same “unyielding resolve” should be extended to Ukraine to be able to “secure a truly just and lasting peace.”

        A man in a dark gray suit and pale blue tie waves next to a blond woman in a white dress, surrounded by people applauding

        Vice President JD Vance, who was seated behind the king, stood up and applauded in response to the call to support Ukraine.

        How those comments will play out in Washington remains to be seen. Trump seemed to take issue with remarks by Prince Harry that the United States should do more to help Ukraine, with the president telling a reporter that the king’s son “is not speaking for the U.K.”

        The king did not directly address the tensions between Trump and Prime Minister Keir Starmer over the United States’ war with Iran. Trump has clashed with the British government over its refusal to commit its defense forces to the conflict and had mocked the Royal Navy’s battleships as “toys.”

        While Trump’s criticism were not addressed directly, the king did speak about his pride in the British defense forces, especially the Royal Navy.

        “I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy, following in the naval footsteps of my father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh; my grandfather, King George VI; my great-uncle, Lord Mountbatten; and my great-grandfather, King George V,” he said.

        The king also noted that conflicts in Europe and the Middle East “pose immense challenges for the international community,” and emphasized the need to work together.

        “The challenges we face are too great for any one nation to bear alone,” he said.

        The king, who has long advocated for the environment and conservation, made a case for doing more for the environment in the future.

        “As we look toward the next 250 years, we must also reflect on our shared responsibility to safeguard nature, our most precious and irreplaceable asset,” he said, adding that climate action is key for “our prosperity and our national security.”

        Continue/Read Original Article: Charles calls for rededication to unity amid strain in U.S.-U.K. ties – Los Angeles Times

        New analysis shows deep cuts needed to San Diego libraries, rec centers to close city budget gap – San Diego Union-Tribune

        Editor’s Note: This is the latest SDUT article on library funding, more of David Garrick’s journalism and excellent coverage. At the end of the article reposting, there is a Gemini AI analysis of the library’s “law” for funding, setup in 2000, and never employed, always exempted. 6 percent. It would fund the libraries. Read below for the analysis of San Diego city government failure in this matter. I saw the same thing during my 15-years at SDPL, nothing has changed, nothing. –DrWeb

        New analysis shows deep cuts needed to San Diego libraries, rec centers to close city budget gap

        Mayor proposes multiple scenarios based on socioeconomics, ranking of sites, asks council to iron out specific cuts.

        James De Simone, center director for the South Clairemont Recreation Center, cleans up on April 27. (K.C. Alfred / The San Diego Union-Tribune)
        James De Simone, center director for the South Clairemont Recreation Center, cleans up on April 27. (K.C. Alfred / The San Diego Union-Tribune)

        By David Garrick | David.Garrick@sduniontribune.com | The San Diego Union-Tribune

        PUBLISHED: April 27, 2026 at 7:21 PM PDT | UPDATED: April 27, 2026 at 8:02 PM PDT

        Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

        The mayor’s new 40-page analysis doesn’t recommend specific cuts but ranks each facility based on its importance to the nearby community and uses those rankings to provide the City Council with possible scenarios.

        Aides to Gloria said Monday that the goal is giving councilmembers the tools and information to make thoughtful decisions and surgical cuts that do the least damage possible to city residents and neighborhoods.

        Kids practice in the peewee soccer division at Golden Hill Recreation Center on Monday, April 27, 2026, in San Diego, CA. The kids are coached by staff members, Nina Hernandez and Lalo Vazquez with the recreation center. (Nelvin C. Cepeda / The San Diego Union-Tribune)
        Kids practice in the peewee soccer division at Golden Hill Recreation Center on Monday, April 27, 2026. The kids are coached by staff members, Nina Hernandez and Lalo Vazquez with the recreation center. (Nelvin C. Cepeda / The San Diego Union-Tribune)

        The rankings of the city’s 37 library branches and 56 rec centers are based on a variety of factors, including the average income nearby, the variety of programs offered at the site, the crime rate and the site’s proximity to similar city facilities.

        Other factors include proximity to child care options, education level of nearby residents and what percentage of their income nearby households spend on transportation.

        For libraries, branches that experienced the deepest cuts last spring are mostly spared in the mayor’s proposed scenarios. The only branch facing possible closure in any of the scenarios is North Clairemont.

        For rec centers, the mayor’s scenarios prioritize preserving hours at facilities that have gyms, also have a senior center on site and host events in the city’s Parks After Dark program for low-income neighborhoods.

        The rec centers facing possible closures in at least one of the mayor’s scenarios are: La Jolla, Santa Clara, South Clairemont, Cadman, Cabrillo, Tecolote, Adams, San Carlos, Irving Salomon, Morley Field Gym, Mid-City Gym, Lopez Ridge, Penn Athletic Field, Robb Field, Nobel Athletic Fields and Hourglass Fieldhouse.

        For both libraries and rec centers, the mayor lays out three separate scenarios. Generally, two options strongly consider socioeconomic factors and the new rankings, while a third proposes cuts more evenly across the city.

        In a memo sent to the council Monday afternoon, Gloria’s aides say the mayor has no preference for any of the proposed scenarios over any of the others.

        Each scenario would save the $7.8 million from libraries and rec centers that the mayor says is needed to close a $146 million budget deficit the city is facing for the new fiscal year that begins July 1.

        When he released his budget April 15, Gloria said libraries and rec centers must suffer cuts so the city can avoid severe cuts to higher priorities such as public safety, infrastructure, transportation and homelessness programs.

        The mayor’s memo suggests that the council, which is scheduled to begin its budget deliberations Monday with a week of department-by-department public hearings, use the library and rec center scenarios as a menu of options.

        “None of the options are preferred and all three for each have adverse impacts on our communities,” the memo says. “As the budget process moves forward, the council may want to explore additional options, and we are ready to support that work.”

        The memo was signed by Rania Amen, the city engineer and the mayor’s chief community officer, and Bethany Bezak, the mayor’s chief performance and logistics officer.

        One of the options for libraries would make traditional citywide cuts based more on usage than socioeconomics and other factors.

        Under this scenario, which is known as Option 2, 18 branches would maintain their current hours and four — Allied Gardens, North Park, University Heights and Carmel Valley — would lose Monday service.

        The remaining 13 locations would still operate Monday through Saturday, but Saturday hours would shrink from a full day to service only from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m.

        Option 1 would focus on helping low-income areas by fully preserving existing hours at three branches: Malcolm X in Council District 4, San Ysidro in District 8 and City Heights in District 9.

        The money to preserve those hours would come from closing the La Jolla branch completely on Saturdays and the Linda Vista branch completely on Mondays.

        Option 3 would focus even more on socioeconomics and keep every branch in low-income Districts 4, 8 and 9 open a full day on Saturdays.

        Read more: New analysis shows deep cuts needed to San Diego libraries, rec centers to close city budget gap – San Diego Union-Tribune

        Continue/Read Original Article: New analysis shows deep cuts needed to San Diego libraries, rec centers to close city budget gap – San Diego Union-Tribune


        Google Gemini AI: A Report on “Phantom Library Funding SPDL”

        Your memory is spot on. That “phantom” funding formula is not a myth; it is San Diego Municipal Code Section 22.0228 and Council Policy 100-19.

        As a veteran of the SDPL, you likely saw the hope that accompanied its passage in 2000, followed by decades of what is effectively “budgetary gaslighting.” Here is the history and the legal reality of that ignored mandate.

        1. The Origin: The 6% “Library Ordinance”

        In the late 1990s, the “Friends of the San Diego Public Library” grew tired of the library system being the City’s favorite “piggy bank” during lean years. They gathered enough momentum to threaten a ballot initiative that would have amended the City Charter to force a specific funding level.

        To avoid a Charter amendment (which is much harder to overturn), the City Council struck a deal. In November 2000, they adopted Council Policy 100-19 and Municipal Code Section 22.0228.

        • The Formula: The City Manager was directed to propose a budget starting at 4.5% of the General Fund in FY2002, increasing by 0.5% annually until it reached a permanent baseline of 6%.
        • The Intent: It was meant to provide a “floor” so that the library wouldn’t have to beg for basic operations every cycle.

        2. The Loophole: “Anticipatory Obedience” in Reverse

        The reason this formula has “never ever been used” (as you noted) is a specific piece of legal architecture within the ordinance itself.

        While the Municipal Code says the budget shall include this funding, it also grants the City Council “necessary discretion” to ignore it if they determine the General Fund has other pressing needs. Essentially, the ordinance is advisory rather than mandatory.

        • The First Breach (2004): Just four years after implementation, during a revenue deficit, the Council passed Resolution R-2004-965, which “temporarily delayed” the scheduled increases.
        • The Perpetual Delay: That “temporary” delay became the status quo. For over 20 years, mayors and councils have used the city’s recurring deficits as a legal shield to bypass the 6% requirement. In reality, library funding has historically hovered between 3% and 4% of the General Fund, rarely if ever hitting the 6% mark.

        3. Recent Legal Challenges

        There has been a recent, high-profile attempt to fix this via the courts and the ballot, though it faced significant headwinds:

        • The Libraries and Parks Improvement Act (2022-2025): The San Diego Public Library Foundation and Parks Foundation attempted to bypass the City Council’s “discretion” by placing a new initiative on the ballot. This would have created a dedicated funding stream unaffected by the General Fund’s whims.
        • The Legal Battle (SDPL Foundation v. Diana Fuentes): In 2024 and 2025, the Foundation sued the City Clerk after thousands of signatures were disqualified, preventing the measure from reaching the ballot. While the California Court of Appeal eventually ruled in 2025 that the City had been “arbitrary” in rejecting some signatures, the delay effectively killed the momentum for the 2024 election cycle.

        Summary of the “Phantom” Formula

        FeatureDetails
        Legal BasisSD Municipal Code § 22.0228 / Council Policy 100-19
        Target Funding6% of the City’s General Fund
        StatusSuspended/Ignored. Routinely bypassed by annual budget resolutions citing “economic necessity.”
        Current RealityIn April 2026, the City is facing a $146M deficit, leading to proposed cuts that would close libraries on Sundays and Mondays—the exact opposite of the 2000 mandate.

        Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Publishes “The State of U.S. Academic Libraries: Findings From the ACRL 2024 Annual Survey” – Library Journal infoDOCKET

        Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Publishes “The State of U.S. Academic Libraries: Findings From the ACRL 2024 Annual Survey”

        April 22, 2026 by Gary Price

        From ACRL: 

        This report focuses on U.S. academic libraries in fiscal year 2024 (the 2023–24 academic year). For the first time this year, the results are weighted to be representative of all U.S. academic libraries, unless otherwise noted. Key findings include:

        • Staff: The average full-time equivalent (FTE) library staff is 36.2 and the median is 15.7. Doctoral universities have much higher staffing levels than all other types. Associate’s colleges and two-year institutions have the highest ratio of students to staff.
        • Expenditures: In 2024, total annual library expenditures reached an average of $2.1 million and median of $487,000 dollars, excluding fringe benefits.
        • Collections and circulation: 79.6% of academic library collections are in digital or electronic format. Digital materials account for 93.2% of total circulation.
        • Instruction: More than half (54.8%) of presentations to groups happen synchronously, and those presentations account for 75.8% of total annual attendance.
        • Accessibility: Most academic libraries (90.2%) have an accessible main entrance and inside the library, 94.4% have wheelchair-accessible hallways. However, only about half (51.6%) have computers with accessible technologies and software.


        Direct to Full Text Report 
        31 pages; PDF.

        Direct to Complete Publication Announcement

        Filed under: Academic Libraries, Associations and Organizations, Libraries, News

        Source: Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Publishes “The State of U.S. Academic Libraries: Findings From the ACRL 2024 Annual Survey” – Library Journal infoDOCKET

        Find Your Library Joy – Evening Magazine Reports from the Central Library

        Tuesday, April 21 was an especially fun day at the Central Library. King 5’s Evening Magazine spent a few hours at the Library filming a story in honor of National Library Week. Host (and Almost Live alum) Chris Cashman interviewed our head of Library Experience and Engagement Kai Tang, visited the art gallery and music Read original article: Read More

        College Sports Has Changed: What’s Going on in College Athletics

        By Jay Barnes

        Historic game stub
        Historic game stub – Courtesy of Jay Barnes

        Hello To You All,

        This is for friends I know who have a love of college basketball and are patient enough to read this.  All of the other collegiate sports are tied to this email as well by association but college hoops, my real true love, is the subject I will concentrate on. Selected friends I have known on this list represent those who have either attended or graduated from or grew up loving their school’s basketball programs scattered across the country.

        Image above of Independence Square, Charlotte, NC, 1955… See More: https://www.bygonely.com/charlotte-1950s/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

        My friend’s schools here on this list include love of North Carolina, Duke, Wake Forest, NC State, Virginia, Baylor, Kansas, Kentucky, Auburn, Ohio State, Tennessee, Georgia, UCLA, Minnesota, Florida State, Boise State, Boston College, Missouri and New Mexico State. You represent twenty schools that not a one of you has failed to be devoted to and failed to express that to me. All of our love has equal weight, no school better than another so as I describe my particular experience it is intended to include and remind you of yours.

        Forgive this personal vent on the insidious attention and greed that accompanies the legal tender. My experience with it starts with the attached ticket to the very first college basketball game I attended, a UNC-Duke game at Reynolds Coliseum during the iconic, now defunct Dixie Classic which had a rich history of gathering the Big Four of the Atlantic Coast Conference; Wake Forest, NC State, Duke and Carolina against four different invited ‘outsider’ schools from across the country each year.

        Schools like Cincinnati with Oscar Robertson, West Virginia with Jerry West, St Bonaventure with Bob Lanier and Michigan State with Jumping Johnny Green. Each year brought fresh and new outstanding competition. The conference always prided itself that no one outside the Big Four ever won the tournament even though many of the outsiders were favorites to win their particular year. I grew up in Charlotte where six Eastern regionals were held over the years. I remember watching Bill Bradley score 46 points in a game, and Jerry West scoring 37 for West Virginia.

        Editor’s Note: Some links below to see more about the great athletes Jay mentions above. –DrWeb

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Bradley

        Image above from “Dean Dome,” opening… See More: https://www.on3.com/teams/north-carolina-tar-heels/news/history-the-smith-centers-grand-opening-unc-basketball-duke/

        Like many kids in the Carolinas, at age twelve I followed the Tar Heels in 1957 as they marched to a 32-0 season and national championship behind the talents of Lenny Rosenbluth and five other New Yorkers brought down south by Frank McGuire along with an unknown golf coach from Air Force University hired as an assistant from Kansas named Dean Smith. For kids in my area of the country it was impossible to forget because an undefeated season had never been accomplished.  It was also memorable because of who Carolina played, Kansas University which was the birthplace of college basketball.

        Their star player, and national player of the year Wilt Chamberlain made the game larger than life, no pun intended.  The Final Four was conducted in Kansas City so it was a home game for the Wildcats. Sprinkle in two Final Four games that produced TWO triple overtimes that were required to win it all. After that my father began a long tradition of placing tickets to the Dixie Classic tournament under our tree each Christmas which started two or three days after between Christmas and New Year’s. He followed that up with a birthday gift of a backyard basketball goal where I wore down the grass into dust in a matter of weeks. That year really hooked me for life. I’ve attended thirteen Final Fours and a larger number of regional Sweet Sixteen tournaments. Not all of the Final Fours included UNC as I just loved the tournament.

        So to the reality of what every one of us must know.  Our talent is the engine we use to navigate our way through life.  We use whatever we possess that gains advantage and make it easier to guide our path and the others we love and bring along for the ride.  The questions that can’t be avoided:

        Is it right for athletes to be included in the rewards of athletic program accomplishment?  Yes, absolutely. Does your son or daughter have the right to hawk chicken or hamburgers because they have a sure three point stroke? Of course. Have our athletes over the years been exploited for the benefit of university athletic program coffers? No question. Is the movement to compensate our athletes a beginning to make up for being used for many years?  Yes, it’s the right thing to do.

        So then it’s fair to make right of these wrongdoings over time.  At the same time we watch what this action produces, at first modestly, then a tsunami emerges. The whispers of AAU agents, marketing managers, advertising agencies, then many of the parents whose ears are being packed with the idea of opportunity and grabbing it while you can.  These are finite special times, never to be repeated, so be smart and act now. And so they do. A highly recruited athlete, professing a life long love of a school, commits to that school, securing a generous sum to bring their talents to that school. And then someone else is in their ear. You’re being exploited. Your talent is way beyond what you are being offered. So and so University will give you twice that amount. Don’t be foolish. Is your loyalty to them worth three million dollars?

        So your university decides to say no, you won’t be leading this discussion. You won’t hold us for ransom. You are talented and we want you but your price is too high. You’re eighteen, we’ve been here forever. So you go enjoy your millions somewhere else. And so he is gone, along with his long forgotten love. And it is replaced with the continuing need of a player whose skills drove him to another school. And your school is doomed to repeat the process and decide if they are desperate enough to give a large sum of money to another player and hope he sticks.

        So flash forward sixty eight years from 1957 and here we are with the introduction of the three point shot, the thirty second clock, the advent of two and done, then one and done, the elimination of tied up jump balls and the proliferation of tv time outs.

        The tsk tsk of calling out almost every Division I school alumni for shoving hundreds into players pockets after games seem trite by today’s standards. The inclusion of NIL and the transfer portal seems to have transported the game to an almost unimaginable game of wet behind the ears teenagers hawking tax advice who haven’t had the displeasure of recognizing a 1040 form until recently. Now a much admired recent graduate of UNC bought a Ben and Jerry’s franchise on Franklin Street before his senior year. A number one pick from last year’s high school rank turned down a four million dollar offer to take a seven million commitment to play a single freshman year of ball at a less known Division I school who has an alumnus willing and able to underwrite the entire basketball budget into perpetuity.

        See More: https://www.tarheelblog.com/unc-basketball/46475/seth-trimble-now-owns-ben-jerrys-in-chapel-hill

        Above all the rest is the growing disconnection between the players/coaching staff and the loyal fan and alumni base on some level. The money has diluted the importance of history and experience and a long period of loyalty to programs who for the most part are, if not the front door of the university experience, is certainly deep rooted in the experience of human beings in those formative and freedom producing years of seventeen to twenty four. Those years that for the great majority of us are never forgotten and are considered some of the most enriching years of our lives. Those years that grow in value as we age. Those years that reflect a more meaningful sense of order. The kind of sense that our parents reflected on when they told the stories of how the big band era made them jitter buggers following the depression and the war.

        Money is a diluter of experience. It waters down meaning  and the joy of a committed communal experience by adding a distraction of self interest. Yes, we want kids to share our perceived value of the experience we have had. But that value is a lonesome one inhabited only by ourselves more often than not. A kid may not know what he wants but there are plenty of voices in his impressionable ears tell them your offered gifts are fleeting. You’d better grab it. And who among us might honesty understand that enticement and see why a kid can change his mind. Would you give up the love of a school for three million dollars that comes from a school you care nothing about? Maybe yes. 

        And if you don’t you can still understand why someone would make that choice. And in the rubble of the results of that decision lies the reason they are where they are. The money. I just hate what it’s doing to the game I love. I confess that sixty eight years of devotion to a sport that is changing so quickly, so drastically is taking away some of the love and devotion to the sport I sometimes find hard to recognize. I am starting to care less and I’ve never thought that could ever happen.

        Good wishes to you and your family, no matter where you are, Jay

        Editor’s Note: This is Jay’s email. I edited minor spacing, but the words are his. I added some photos and links for more context. You can reply and comment, and I’ll let Jay know your comments. Or, when I post this on Facebook, comment there too. –DrWeb (aka Jay’s 50-year plus friend)

        Additional Voices on College Athetics and Sports, via ChatGPT


        1. Dick Vitale

        • ESPN columns: Dick Vitale on ESPN
        • Background / credibility reference:
          Dick Vitale profile
        • Shows primarily his ESPN commentary and recurring opinion pieces. He’s been a central college basketball voice at ESPN since 1979.

        2. Jay Bilas

        • ESPN author page (articles, analysis, commentary): Jay Bilas on ESPN
        • His written analysis + TV commentary clips. He’s a long-time ESPN analyst and frequent contributor across platforms.

        3. Seth Davis

        • Primary current platform: Seth Davis at Hoops HQ
        • Additional background / credibility:
          Seth Davis profile overview
        • This is probably the strongest modern source—he now runs Hoops HQ, a dedicated college basketball media platform, and also writes for major outlets.

        4. Fran Fraschilla

        • ESPN bio / media page:
          Fran Fraschilla ESPN bio
        • He’s more broadcast-heavy (less long-form writing), but this page anchors his ESPN presence and credentials as a regular analyst.

        See Also: https://tarheeltribune.com/2026/04/26/uncs-history-of-losing-one-season-players-with-eligibility-left-is-short-but-it-began-54-years-ago/

        Al Gore: Trump Administration Is the Most Corrupt in History – Mother Jones

        • Environment, April 1, 2026

        Al Gore: Trump Administration Is the Most Corrupt in History

        “I never would’ve believed that any president would do even one-tenth of the atrocious things Donald Trump has done,” Vice President Al Gore says. Kamran Jebreili / AP

        “I never would’ve believed that any president would do even one-tenth of the atrocious things Donald Trump has done,” Vice President Al Gore says. Kamran Jebreili / AP

        Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

        Few political figures occupy the sort of space in American history that Al Gore does. A longtime member of Congress before becoming vice president, Gore lost the presidency in 2000 to George W. Bush after a highly controversial decision by the Supreme Court.

        But in the years that followed, Gore didn’t slink into history. Instead, he worked to sound the growing alarm on climate change, most notably with his documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, which came out 20 years ago. A year later, he won the Nobel Peace Prize. 

        Today, he’s still at it and in many ways more adamant than ever that now is the time to act on global warming, especially as the Trump administration rolls back environmental protections and condemns climate science. But he also has more on his mind than the state of the planet, namely the state of democracy and the direction of the country under President Donald Trump.

        “This is the most corrupt administration not only in American history, but more corrupt than I could ever have imagined a president would be able to get away with to the extent that he has,” Gore tells More To The Story’s Al Letson. “It’s shocking to me.”

        On this week’s episode, the former vice president admonishes the White House for making an “astonishing mistake” in its attack on Iran, looks back at his groundbreaking climate change documentary, and talks about why he believes political will in America is still a renewable resource.

        Find More To The Story on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, Pandora, or your favorite podcast app, and don’t forget to subscribe.

        Continue/Read Original Article: Al Gore: Trump Administration Is the Most Corrupt in History – Mother Jones

        The American Library Association has released its list of the most challenged books of 2025 – News – WLIW-FM

        The American Library Association has released its list of the most challenged books of 2025

        By Anastasia Tsioulcas | April 20, 2026

        The American Library Association's list of the most frequently challenged books of 2025 includes Sold by Patricia McCormick, The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and Maia Kobabe's Gender Queer: A Memoir.
        The American Library Association’s list of the most frequently challenged books of 2025 includes Sold by Patricia McCormick, The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and Maia Kobabe’s Gender Queer: A Memoir. (American Library Association)

        According to the ALA, the 11 most frequently targeted books include several tied titles. They are:

        1. Sold by Patricia McCormick
        2. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
        3. Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe
        4. Empire of Storms by Sarah J. Maas
        5. (tie) Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo
        5. (tie) Tricks by Ellen Hopkins
        7. A Court of Thorns and Roses by Sarah J. Maas
        8. (tie) A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
        8. (tie) Identical by Ellen Hopkins
        8. (tie) Looking for Alaska by John Green
        8. (tie) Storm and Fury by Jennifer L. Armentrout

        Many of these individual titles also appear on a 2024-25 report issued last October by PEN America, a separate group dedicated to free expression, which looked at book challenges and bans specifically within public schools.

        The ALA says that it documented 4,235 unique titles being challenged in 2025 – the second-highest year on record for library challenges. (The highest ever was in 2023, with 4,240 challenges documented – only five more than in this most recent year.)

        According to the ALA, 40% of the materials challenged in 2025 were representations of LGBTQ+ people and those of people of color.

        In all, the ALA documented 713 attempts across the United States in 2025 to censor library materials and services; 487 of those challenges targeted books.

        According to the ALA, 92% of all book challenges to libraries came from “pressure groups,” government officials and local decision makers. While 20.8% came from pressure groups such as Moms for Liberty (as the ALA cited in an email to NPR), 70.9% of challenges originated with government officials and other “decision makers,” such as local board officials or administrators.

        In a more detailed breakdown, the ALA notes that 31% of challenges came from elected government officials and and 40% from board members or administrators. In its full report, the ALA states that only 2.7% of such challenges originated with parents, and 1.4% with individual library users.

        Editor’s Note: The full ALA report is embedded below. –DrWeb

        Fifty-one percent of challenges were attempted at public libraries, and 37% involved school libraries. The remaining challenges of 2025 targeted school curriculums and higher education.

        The ALA defines a book “ban” as the removal of materials, including books, from a library. A “challenge,” in this organization’s definition, is an attempt to have a library resource removed, or access to it restricted.

        The ALA is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to American libraries and librarians.

        Continue/Read Original Article: The American Library Association has released its list of the most challenged books of 2025 | News | WLIW-FM

        Public libraries should act as third spaces – Marquette Wire 

        To an individual, isolation can lead · For example, the Milwaukee Public Library has events…  Read original article: Read More

        National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America – JFK Library

        1. Home, Events and Awards, Kennedy Library Forums

        Tue, May 5 2026, 7 – 8pm Add to calendar: Google  Outlook  iCal 

        National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America

        From its drafting by Thomas Jefferson to today, award-winning historian Michael Auslin’s National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America charts the many lives of a document that captures the soul of America and has united generations around its defiant ideals. As the 250th anniversary of America’s founding approaches, Auslin discusses the Declaration as a physical object and a set of ideals that have made America what it is today with Arun Rath, Executive Editor and Host at GBH. Register 

        How to Attend

        All Forums are free and open to the public. Reservations are strongly recommended, and may be made by clicking the “Register” link on this page, or by calling 617-514-1643. For in-person Forums, doors to the main hall open approximately one hour before the start of each program.

        Watch Past Forums

        Kennedy Library Forums are webcast live and recorded whenever possible. Written transcripts of most recorded events are also available. View our past Forums or visit our YouTube channel  to view past forums.

        Sponsors

        Logos for Lowell Institute, Bank of America, and Mass Cultural Council

        Source: National Treasure: How the Declaration of Independence Made America | JFK Library

        2026 U.S. Midterms Report: March 2026 Update

        MAGA's War Over the War with Iran (w/ Curt Mills) [Teaser]
        MAGA’s War Over the War with Iran (w/ Curt Mills) [Teaser]

        Editor’s Note: Prepared for DrWeb’s Domain by Claude. Next report will be end of April. -–DrWeb. Note the Time window: Mid-February 2026 through end of March 2026. Data current as of April 9, 2026.

        The Numbers

        The CNN Poll of Polls average landed at 37 approve / 61 disapprove, a net of -24. That is not a blip. It reflects a sustained slide that began at the start of his second term, when Trump entered office at roughly 47 percent approval, and has moved consistently downward since.

        The economy is the engine driving those numbers. CNN/SSRS found Trump’s approval on the economy at a career low of 31 percent, and his approval on inflation at just 27 percent — down from 44 percent a year ago. Roughly two-thirds of Americans now say his policies have made economic conditions worse, a 10-point increase since January. With the Iran war pushing gas above $4 a gallon nationally and the CBO projecting higher inflation through 2029 partly due to tariffs, voters are connecting their kitchen-table frustrations directly to presidential decisions.

        Critically, the erosion is not confined to Democrats and independents. The Economist/YouGov found that among 2024 Trump voters, strong approval dropped 15 points in just three weeks — from 84 percent approving in early March to 76 percent by month’s end. Republicans who strongly approve fell from 52 percent in January to 43 percent by the CNN/SSRS poll. When a president starts losing altitude with his own base, it creates a very different kind of political environment heading into a midterm year.

        What the Prediction Markets Are Saying

        Chart 2 shows the Polymarket prediction market odds as of April 9, 2026 — and they are the most lopsided readings of this midterm cycle so far.

        Traders are pricing Democrats as 87 percent favorites to flip the House, with Republicans at just 13 percent. The Senate is considerably tighter, with Democrats at 53 percent and Republicans at 47 percent — reflecting the difficult map Democrats face defending seats in Georgia, Michigan, and other competitive states even as the political environment tilts their way.

        These are sentiment indicators, not polls — real money is behind them, but they move with the news cycle and should be read alongside traditional surveys rather than in place of them. That said, the scale of the House number is notable. The generic congressional ballot — where Democrats currently lead by roughly 6 points in most aggregates — combined with redistricting changes in California, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas, gives that 87 percent figure more grounding than it might otherwise have.

        The Bigger Picture Heading into Spring

        Historical patterns are worth keeping in mind here. In 2006, George W. Bush sat at roughly 38 percent approval as the Iraq war dragged on — and Republicans lost 30 House seats and 6 Senate seats, flipping both chambers. In 2018, Trump was at about 41 percent approval and lost 40 House seats. New district-level estimates now show Trump’s approval below 50 percent among registered voters in 135 Republican-held congressional seats — 104 in the House, 31 in the Senate. That is the structural danger Republicans are sitting in right now.

        Democrats are not without their own challenges. Party approval is still low in absolute terms — CNN found the Democratic Party itself at just 28 percent approval. The generic ballot lead of D+6, while meaningful, is not yet wave territory on its own. The out-party typically gains another 5 points between spring and Election Day in midterm cycles; if that pattern holds, November could look very different from today. But the conditions have to hold — and a lot can change between now and then.

        What is clear right now: the 2026 midterms are shaping up as a direct referendum on a second-term president whose approval has fallen nearly 8 points since January 2025, whose base is showing unusual cracks, and whose signature issues — prices, the economy, foreign policy — are all running negative in the polls. The charts above capture that moment in the data. We will update them monthly as the cycle develops.

        Updated monthly until midterms in November, 2026.

        6 States Monitoring Potential Hantavirus Exposures

        0

        A CDC escort team is prepping a charter flight with a biocontainment unit on board. A look at what the United States government is doing to get Americans off the hantavirus cruise ship and back home. 

        Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

        ​The Source with Kaitlan Collins

        The midterm enthusiasm gap – Ipsos

        0

        Below are five charts on the political mood of the country heading into the 2026 midterm elections.  Read original article: Read More

        Republicans gain upper hand in redistricting fight, but they still face midterm headwinds

        0

        Hakeem Jeffries and Mike Johnson. The House majority is up for grabs in the 2026 midterm elections.Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty …  Read original article: Read More

        Education Department launches hiring spree in key office, roughly a year after mass layoffs

        0

        The Federal Student Aid office plans to hire 334 full-time employees by 2027, despite staffing cuts last year and efforts to send the department’s …  Read original article: Read More

        ‘A writer and an artist who cares’: UGA professor Ed Pavlić named a 2026 Guggenheim Fellow

        0

        At 18 years old, Ed Pavlić attended college to pursue a business degree. Nearly 40 years later, as a distinguished research professor of English …  Read original article: Read More

        A Large Democratic-Led State Says Yes to Trump’s School Choice Program

        0

        Hochul “is supportive of the federal tax credit scholarship and its potential to help New York students and schools,” a spokesperson said in an email …  Read original article: Read More

        UW College of Education Honors Faculty, Staff, Students – University of Wyoming

        0

        The college’s faculty, staff and student award winners are: — Faculty Award for Outstanding Teaching: Barbara Hickman, associate professor of …  Read original article: Read More

        Virginia supreme court strikes down new congressional maps in win for Republicans

        0

        Maps, recently approved by voters, would have helped Democrats gain up to four new seats in US House.  Read original article: Read More

        Trump’s looming defeat in Iran is a personal and political crisis – The Guardian 

        0

        Trump’s ego cannot accept a humiliating loss, and we are already seeing the effects of his failure playing out. Read original article: Read More

        Marianne Boruch has won the $100,000 Jackson Poetry Prize.

        0

        This week, Poets & Writers awarded their annual Jackson Poetry Prize, which “recognizes an American poet of exceptional talent,” and comes with a purse of $100,000, to Chicago-born poet Marianne Boruch. This year’s judges were Major Jackson, Cole Swensen, and Afaa Michael Read original article: Read More

        Security Officer (Charles Library) Temple University Job in Philadelphia at Allied Universal 

        Allied Universal®, North America’s leading security and facility services company, offers rewarding careers that provide…  Read original article: Read More

        Bourne Select Board Authorizes Contract Negotiations With Pomroy Associates For Library Building 

        … library projects, most recently the Swansea Free Public Library. Prefacing that he has “the…  Read original article: Read More

        In Huge Blow to Democrats, Virginia Court Strikes Down House Map – The New York Times 

        0

        The decision is a major victory for Republicans, wiping away a measure approved by voters to allow Democrats to gain as many as four House seats … Read original article: Read More

        Rubio Meets Meloni, Amid Rocky U.S.-Italian Relations – ny times 

        0

        Secretary of State Marco Rubio flew to Rome this week after an unexpected spat between President Trump and Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy, … Read original article: Read More

        Supreme Court of Virginia strikes down redistricting amendment, keeps current maps in place

        0

        The ruling leaves the state’s current congressional districts — which give Democrats a 6-5 advantage — in place throughout the 2026 midterm election …  Read original article: Read More

        Mythos Fallout, U.S. Government Weighs AI Model Regulation | Lawfare 

        0

        The Trump administration is considering applying stricter oversight to American artificial intelligence (AI) models due to their cybersecurity impact. Read original article: Read More

        The charred hull of Artemis 2’s Orion | Space photo of the day for May 8, 2026

        0

        NASA’s Artemis 2 Orion spacecraft rests after its flight around the moon, charred from the return to Earth. Read original article: Read More 

        Lit Hub Daily: May 8, 2026

        0

        Irene Zabytko recounts reimagining The Canterbury Tales in post-Soviet Ukraine. | Lit Hub Craft What our Google searches reveal about humanity and grief. | Lit Hub Technology Think it’s hard to write stories for adults? Try writing stories for children. Read original article: Read More

        The Resurrection of Michael Jackson

        0

        The new biopic about Michael Jackson has been a record-shattering box office success.
        The subsequent outpouring of love for the musician was the result of a painstaking, yearslong effort to resurrect the reputation of the king of pop, despite the accusations of sexual abuse that have surrounded him for decades.
        Mark Binelli, a writer for The New York Times Magazine, discusses the new playbook for rewriting the past.
        Guest: Mark Binelli, a writer for The New York Times Magazine.
        Background reading: 

        The rise and fall and rise of Michael Jackson.

        Photo: Lionsgate
        For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 
        Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.  Read original article: Read More

        It’s One Ballroom, Donald, How Much Could It Cost?

        0

        The post It’s One Ballroom, Donald, How Much Could It Cost? appeared first on Crooked Media. Read original article: Read More

        What Should You Read Next? Here Are the Best Reviewed Books of the Week

        0

        John Lanchester’s Look What You Made Me Do, Elizabeth Strout’s The Things We Never Say, and Siri Hustvedt’s Ghost Stories all feature among the best reviewed books of the week. Brought to you by Book Marks, Lit Hub’s home for book Read original article: Read More

        What Our Ideas About Ugliness Reveal About Our Anxieties Surrounding Gender

        0

        I was assessing my face against my mother’s from my earliest memories, or rather the world around me was, and it was consistently communicating—in a quizzical glance or a compliment withheld or a hostile blank face—that I was falling short, Read original article: Read More

        Report: “One in 277 PubMed-Indexed Papers In 2026 Shows Fabricated References, Says Analysis”

        0

        From Retraction Watch:

        Fabricated citations in the biomedical literature have increased 12-fold in two years, according to an audit of nearly 2.5 million papers published as a letter to The Lancet today.

        The analysis of articles indexed in PubMed found that about one in 277 papers published in the first seven weeks of 2026 referenced a paper that didn’t exist. That was a jump from 2025’s rate of one in 458 and 2023’s one in 2,828. The researchers, led by Maxim Topaz of Columbia University’s Data Science Institute, used AI to “distinguish genuine fabrications from formatting discrepancies such as informally abbreviated titles.”

        Topaz’s group located the sharpest increase in hallucinated references in mid-2024, which they note coincided with the rise of AI writing tools. The findings come as Nature reported last month that tens of thousands of publications from 2025 “might include invalid references generated by AI.” Retraction Watch has seen its fair share of reports of hallucinated citations generated by LLMs like ChatGPT.

        [Clip]

        Mohammad Hosseini, a researcher in biostatistics and informatics at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, called The Lancet analysis “simplistic.” In a March paper, Hosseini and Resnik made a point of distinguishing between hallucinated citations that matter to a paper’s scientific conclusions and those that do not. Topaz’s group didn’t differentiate scientifically critical references – which effectively function as data – from those that were relatively less important, Hosseini said.

        Hosseini told us the study represents “low-hanging fruit” and the “tip of the iceberg.” He said the “bigger and more important problem” remains citations generated by AI that aren’t wholly hallucinated but are inaccurate, biased or incomplete. “We are far from being able to even detect them or do anything about them,” he said.

        Learn More, Read the Complete Article (about 1290 words)

        See Also: Fabricated Citations: An Audit Across 2·5 Million Biomedical Papers (via The Lancet;Volume 407, Issue 10541p1779-1781May 09, 2026)

        The post Report: “One in 277 PubMed-Indexed Papers In 2026 Shows Fabricated References, Says Analysis” appeared first on Library Journal infoDOCKET.

        Read original article: Read More

        Officials Race to Track Deadly Hantavirus Infections

        0

        The scramble to trace a deadly and rare outbreak as President Trump addresses the hantavirus outbreak for the first time. 

        Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

        ​The Source with Kaitlan Collins

        ‘Undruggable’ cancer proteins meet their match

        0

        Nature, Published online: 08 May 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01447-2People with a deadly form of pancreatic cancer survive longer on a drug that blocks the activity of a family of mutant proteins.  Read original aricle: Read More

        World-leading climate centre takes Trump administration to court

        0

        Nature, Published online: 08 May 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01501-zUniversities that run the National Center for Atmospheric Research want to keep it from being dismantled.  Read original aricle: Read More

        Radioactive rain and proving relativity: Books in brief

        0

        Nature, Published online: 08 May 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-01500-0Andrew Robinson reviews five of the best science picks.  Read original aricle: Read More

        Opinion: I Taught for 23 Years. Antisemitism Forced Me Out. – Baltimore Jewish Times

        0

        Teaching in American schools has never been easy. But in recent years … And importantly, this school was not the only one in Frederick County Public …  Read original article: Read More

        2026 | Lehman Weekly May 3-9: Setting the Pace

        0

        School of Education … The event was led by Dr. Wilfredo José Burgos Matos and supported by the Department of Latin American and Latino Studies and the …  Read original article: Read More

        Tennessee Republicans redraw maps to erase last Democratic, Black-majority district

        0

        Tennessee’s Republican-dominated legislature passed redistricting maps on Thursday, eliminating the state’s one Democratic, Black-majority …  Read original article: Read More

        Redistricting race to the bottom: GOP eyes states to redraw House maps – CNBC

        0

        An April Supreme Court ruling has caused a scrambled in some southern states to redistrict before November’s midterm elections.  Read original article: Read More

        Impact Story: From Story Time to Full-Circle Moment

        0

        Delight Roberts credits her lifelong passion for reading to a powerful combination: her mother and public libraries. A patron of The Seattle Public Library for 26 years, Delight is passing this passion down to her teenage son, Ethan, who is a library reader and competitive jump-roper (more on that soon!). Delight and her brother grew Read original article: Read More