Home Blog

The Biggest Cybersecurity Mistakes People Still Make – Simply Geeky

Man looking at computer screen displaying security warning and malware detected alerts
A man at home notices malware alerts on his computer screen while working. AI image by WP AI.

Security Guide

The Biggest Cybersecurity Mistakes People Still Make

Human error drives the majority of breaches — and the most dangerous habits are also the most common.

June 10, 2026 9 min read Simply Geeky Editorial

The biggest cybersecurity mistakes people make are rarely the result of sophisticated gaps in technical knowledge — they are, more often than not, entirely preventable habits that persist despite years of public awareness campaigns. According to research from Stanford University, roughly 88 percent of all cyberattacks are directly or indirectly linked to human error, a figure that has remained stubbornly consistent even as the tools available to defenders have grown more powerful. The global cost of a data breach reached an average of $4.88 million in 2024, according to IBM, underscoring that what looks like a minor lapse — a reused password, a delayed software update, a hurried click on a suspicious link — can carry consequences that are anything but minor. Understanding where people go wrong is the first and most practical step toward correcting it.

Password Hygiene

Reusing Weak Passwords Across Multiple Accounts

Password reuse remains one of the most documented and consequential security failures in the digital age. A 2025 study by the Cybernews research team analyzed more than 19 billion passwords exposed in data leaks and breaches occurring between April 2024 and mid-2025. Their findings were stark: only six percent of those passwords were classified as unique, meaning 94 percent were either reused or duplicated across accounts. The study also found that simple patterns — sequences like “123456,” common first names, and basic keyboard walks — still dominated the datasets in 2025, decades after security professionals began advising against them.

The practical danger of this habit lies in a category of automated attack known as credential stuffing. When one platform suffers a breach and usernames and passwords are leaked, attackers use automated tools to test those same credentials against banking portals, email providers, cloud services, and corporate logins. According to Verizon’s 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report, stolen credentials were the initial access vector in 22 percent of all confirmed breaches — more than any other single category. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has specifically flagged the absence of strong password policies as one of the most routinely exploited weaknesses in both consumer and enterprise environments.

94% of the 19 billion passwords analyzed in a 2025 Cybernews study were found to be reused or duplicated — leaving the vast majority of accounts exposed to credential stuffing attacks. (Cybernews, 2025)

The recommended countermeasures are well-established: use a password manager to generate and store long, unique credentials for every account, and avoid relying on memorable patterns tied to birthdays, names, or common phrases. Password managers reduce the cognitive burden that leads people to reuse credentials in the first place, and the most widely used ones store data in encrypted vaults that are not readable even by the service provider.

Authentication

Skipping Multi-Factor Authentication on Critical Accounts

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) — which requires a second form of verification beyond a password — is one of the most effective single controls available to both individuals and organizations, yet adoption remains uneven. According to DemandSage, approximately 70 percent of enterprise users had adopted some form of MFA by 2025. For small businesses, however, that figure dropped to roughly 30 to 35 percent. Among consumers, adoption varies widely depending on the service and the user’s familiarity with the technology.

Research cited in the FIDO Alliance’s 2024 authentication report found that enabling two-factor authentication can block up to 96 percent of bulk phishing attacks and 76 percent of targeted attacks. Despite this, many people disable or skip MFA because of the friction involved in the additional verification step — a trade-off that CISA has repeatedly described as a poor calculation. In a notable 2025 incident, the airline Qantas fell victim to a social engineering attack in which members of the hacker group Scattered Spider called the company’s helpdesk while impersonating employees, ultimately bypassing even active MFA protections by exploiting human trust rather than technical flaws.

It is also worth noting that not all MFA methods carry equal security weight. SMS-based codes are susceptible to SIM-swapping attacks, in which an attacker convinces a mobile carrier to transfer a victim’s phone number to a new SIM card. Authenticator apps and hardware security keys — which generate time-sensitive codes locally or require physical possession — provide considerably stronger protection. Security researchers have increasingly recommended that users avoid SMS-based MFA when more secure alternatives are available.

Top initial access vectors in confirmed breaches — Verizon DBIR 2025 & IBM Cost of a Data Breach 2024/2025

Phishing Awareness

Falling for Phishing Attacks and Social Engineering Tactics

Phishing — the practice of deceiving someone into revealing credentials or clicking a malicious link through a fraudulent communication — consistently ranks among the most prevalent attack methods targeting individuals and organizations alike. Comcast Business’s cybersecurity threat data indicates that phishing initiates between 80 and 95 percent of all human-associated breaches. IBM’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach report found that phishing accounted for nearly 30 percent of all global breaches, at an average incident cost of $4.88 million per organization.

What makes phishing particularly resilient as an attack vector is that it has become dramatically more sophisticated. Modern phishing campaigns routinely impersonate trusted institutions — banks, government agencies, internal IT departments, and technology platforms — with visual accuracy that can make even attentive recipients uncertain. According to a 2024 report from Tech.co, a mere 1.6 percent of senior leaders can correctly identify a phishing scam when tested. The same report found that phishing-related data breaches surged across 2024, with 40 percent of business data breaches attributable to phishing, up from 23 percent in 2023.

Continue/Read Original Article: The Biggest Cybersecurity Mistakes People Still Make | Simply Geeky

New Research Shows Why Coffee Is Linked to Longevity – Food & Wine

Why Coffee May Help You Live Longer, According to New Research

No need to cut out your morning coffee habit.

By Stacey Leasca, Published on June 10, 2026

Two-thirds of Americans drink coffee every day. According to 2026 data from the National Coffee Association, this makes it the most consumed drink in the country, surpassing juice, tea, and even bottled water. Luckily for the millions of coffee fans out there, a growing body of evidence indicates that this daily beverage has health benefits.

As we reported last year, research has shown that regular coffee consumption could help people live longer by reducing their risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Now, researchers have a better understanding of the science behind why coffee may lengthen lives.

In April, scientists from the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (VMBS) published new findings focused on coffee in the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nutrients. The research reveals that certain compounds in coffee activate a nuclear receptor known as NR4A1, a protein inside human cells that’s connected to our stress response, disease, and even aging. 

This Breakfast Staple Could Lower Your Alzheimer’s Risk by 27%, According to a New Study

“Coffee has well-known health-promoting properties,” Stephen Safe, a distinguished professor of veterinary physiology and pharmacology at VMBS, shared in a report published by Texas A&M. “What we’ve shown is that some of those effects may be linked to how coffee compounds interact with this receptor, which is involved in protecting the body from stress-induced damage.”

The researchers explained that NR4A1 is a “nutrient sensor” that responds to compounds we eat and drink and plays a critical role in health as we age. The sensor is involved in biological processes, including inflammation, metabolism, and tissue repair. “If you damage almost any tissue, NR4A1 responds to bring that damage down,” Safe detailed. “If you take that receptor away, the damage is worse.”

The scientists found that compounds in coffee — specifically polyhydroxy and polyphenolic compounds like caffeic acid — can bind to and activate the NR4A1 receptor. In addition to reacting with NR4A1, these compounds could impact cell behavior in ways that help prevent diseases, such as reducing cellular damage and slowing cancer cell growth. (It is important to note that this has only been shown in lab models so far and not in human trials.)

Although caffeine is a major component of coffee, the work suggests that it isn’t responsible for the health benefits of the beverage. “Caffeine binds the receptor, but it doesn’t do much in our models,” Safe explained. “The polyhydroxy and polyphenolic compounds are much more active.”

Scientists Studied Tea, Coffee, and Bone Health for 10 Years — One Drink Came Out Ahead

While the recent findings are promising, Safe emphasized that these compounds in coffee are, most likely, not the only component responsible for the beverage’s health benefits, and more research is needed. The professor explained that, “there are many receptors and many mechanisms involved. What we’re showing is that this could be one of the important pathways.”

This research does open up new opportunities for exploration. The relationship that the NR4A1 receptor has with multiple biological processes means that better understanding it could “inform future efforts to develop new therapies,” Texas A&M reports. To start, the scientists are already looking into synthetic compounds that target the receptor more effectively than the natural ones found in coffee. This work could eventually contribute to the development of targeted treatments for diseases like cancer. For now, at least we all have a scientific reason to savor that daily cup of joe.

Continue/Read Original Article: New Research Shows Why Coffee Is Linked to Longevity

2026 FIFA World Cup: How to watch and other questions answered – NPR

Crowd of diverse soccer fans and players celebrating FIFA World Cup 2026 with flags and fireworks at MetLife Stadium
Fans and players celebrate the FIFA World Cup 2026 at MetLife Stadium with fireworks and flags. AI image by WP AI.

Special Series. Soccer Edition

The World Cup is starting. Here’s what to know and how to watch

Headshot of Juliana Kim

June 10, 20265:00 AM ET

By Juliana Kim

Workers work from a crane at Los Angeles Stadium on June 7, ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The workers are standing in a metal basket at the end of the crane's long arm and are doing work to the top rim of the stadium.
Workers work from a crane at Los Angeles Stadium (temporarily renamed from SoFi Stadium) on June 7, ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images

We’ve talked about the astronomical ticket prices. The fragile geopolitics that almost made Iran withdraw. And the summer heat posing a risk across host cities.

Now, it’s finally time to talk about (and watch) the games.

This photo shows a broad view of soccer fans packing the inside of the Rose Bowl prior to the World Cup final on July 17, 1994. Trees, including palm trees, rise up behind the stadium.

Soccer Edition

Soccer was once considered niche in the U.S. Then came the 1994 World Cup

The first matches of the 2026 FIFA World Cup in North America kick off Thursday with Mexico vs. South Africa and South Korea vs. Czech Republic. The first game for the United States will be against Paraguay on Friday at 9 p.m. ET.

This summer, 48 men’s national teams will compete in the World Cup’s biggest tournament ever. You can find all of NPR’s World Cup coverage over the next six weeks in our series Soccer Edition. But here are a few of the basics to get you started.

Sponsor Message

The timeline

The first round, also known as the group stage, will run through June 27. There are 12 groups consisting of four teams each, and each team will play against the other three. The top 32 countries will advance.

How are the teams ranked? Well, winning a match = 3 points; a draw = 1 point; and a loss = nada. The top two teams of each group will make it to the next round, as well as eight of the best third-place teams.

Once that’s settled, it’s time for the knockout phase. This is when the tournament starts to become a real nail-biter. From here on, the result of a single match will determine each team’s fate. First, 32 teams will face off between June 28 and July 3. Then, the remaining 16 teams will compete from July 4 to 7.

The quarterfinals are July 9 to 11, and the semifinals are July 14 and 15. A match to see which team places third will be on July 18. And the final will be on July 19.

How do I watch?

As of Wednesday, a trove of seats is still available to watch the games in person. Ticket prices, however, remain high.

For those planning to watch at home, Fox has exclusive English-language rights to broadcast the World Cup in the United States.

Sponsor Message

That means, if you have cable, you should be able to access the games for free as long as Fox and Fox Sports’ cable channel FS1 are included in your TV package. (Some matches will air on Fox and others on FS1. Check here.)

A view of World Cup signage at New York New Jersey Stadium on May 19 in East Rutherford, N.J., one of 11 sites where matches will be played in the U.S.

Soccer Edition

39 World Cup teams will be based in the U.S. Here’s which squad will be closest to you

For those planning to stream, the games will be available live and on demand via the Fox One app with a paid subscription. Meanwhile, with a free sign-in on Tubi, a streaming service owned by Fox Corp., you can watch the opening ceremony and two early matches: Mexico vs. South Africa on June 11 and the U.S. vs. Paraguay on June 12.

For fans looking to watch the games in Spanish, Telemundo will air 104 matches, through either its main channel or a secondary network, Universo. All of Telemundo’s coverage will be carried live and on demand on Peacock with a paid subscription.

Which countries are in the World Cup?

Group A: Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Czech Republic

Group B: Canada, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Qatar, Switzerland

Group C: Brazil, Morocco, Haiti, Scotland

Group D: United States, Paraguay, Australia, Turkey

Group E: Germany, Curaçao, Ivory Coast, Ecuador

Group F: Netherlands, Japan, Sweden, Tunisia

Group G: Belgium. Egypt, Iran, New Zealand

Group H: Spain, Cape Verde, Saudi Arabia, Uruguay

Group I: France, Senegal, Iraq, Norway

Group J: Argentina, Algeria, Austria, Jordan

Group K: Portugal, Democratic Republic of Congo, Uzbekistan, Colombia

Group L: England, Croatia, Ghana, Panama

What’s new? 

Even before the opening ceremony, this World Cup will be one for the history books. That’s because of its sheer scale. For the first time, the tournament will be played across three host countries. A record 48 countries will compete — up from 32 — in 104 matches. That includes four debutants: Cape Verde, Curaçao, Jordan and Uzbekistan.

Praia, Cape Verde (April 9, 2026) — Pedro Bettencourt, president of the country’s prestigious youth football training school known by its Portuguese acronym EPIF, says he has seen a shift in young players since the national team’s recent success. Here, players prepare for a training session.

Soccer Edition

Cape Verde: Tiny nation, massive World Cup dream

Also for the first time, the final, which will be held at MetLife Stadium field in New Jersey (known as New York New Jersey Stadium during the tournament), will feature a Super Bowl-like halftime show with headliners Shakira, Madonna and BTS.

And a new rule means that any player who covers his mouth duringa confrontation with an opponent may be penalized with a red card, which results in immediate dismissal from the field and suspension from the subsequent match. The rule is meant to prevent athletes from using discriminatory language during games. It also says a red card may be given to any player who leaves the field in protest of a referee’s decision.

Sponsor Message

Who are the favorites?

In World Cup history, only eight teams have ever won: Brazil, Germany, Italy, Argentina, France, Uruguay, England and Spain. All of these countries (with the exception of Italy, which didn’t qualify this year) are considered major contenders this summer.

Players of the United States pose for a team photograph prior to their World Cup tune-up match against Germany at Chicago's Soldier Field on Saturday.

Soccer Edition

4 takeaways from the U.S. men’s final tune-up games before the World Cup

Many fans are especially feeling good about Spain and, specifically, its 18-year-old player, Lamine Yamal, who is quickly moving up in the soccer world as one of the greats. Others are eyeing France for its strong cast of players, like Kylian Mbappé and last year’s Ballon d’Or winner, Ousmane Dembélé. Then there’s Argentina, the reigning champion. Argentine superstar Lionel Messi, who is now captain of the MLS team Inter Miami, returns for his sixth World Cup. If the country goes all the way, it will be the first back-to-back World Cup victory since 1962.

Source: 2026 FIFA World Cup: How to watch and other questions answered : NPR

Where to Watch, Read, and Follow World Cup 2026: The Complete Media Guide

Media guide cover for 2026 FIFA World Cup featuring players, host cities, and event details
Hands hold the ultimate media guide for the 2026 FIFA World Cup across the USA, Mexico, and Canada. AI image by WP AI.

With 104 games across three countries and 48 teams, the biggest World Cup in history deserves the biggest media toolkit. Here’s every site worth bookmarking.

By DrWeb  |  drwebdomain.blog  |  June 2026 | Editor’s Note: The layout and content were developed with the able aid of the Claude AI. –DrWeb

It starts June 11. It ends July 19. In between, 48 nations and 104 matches will unspool across 16 stadiums in the United States, Mexico, and Canada — the first World Cup ever co-hosted by three countries, and by a wide margin the largest tournament the sport has ever staged.

If you’re planning to follow along — whether you’re a lifelong soccer obsessive, a casual fan riding the wave of host-country euphoria, or a journalist covering the cultural moment — you’re going to need a media stack. Not just one broadcaster. Not just one app. A real, deliberate toolkit of sites that cover different angles of the same enormous story.

I put this list together because I was tired of searching. There’s a lot of noise out there — aggregators repackaging aggregators, SEO-bait “best sites” lists that haven’t been updated since Qatar 2022, and AI-generated roundups that confidently cite URLs that don’t exist. What follows is verified, current, and organized by tier — from the official broadcast rights holders down to the data platforms and specialty trackers that serious fans actually use.

“104 matches. 48 nations. Three host countries. One media guide to follow it all.”

Bookmark what you need. Skip what you don’t. But at least now you’ll know what’s out there.

Editor’s Note: As a small blog, I cannot offer regular game scores, news, or schedule updates. Please bookmark and use the listed sites for your updates; many will offer notifications ;)… –DrWeb


🏆 Tier 1 — Official & Primary Broadcast Rights Holders

These are your ground-truth sources — the tournament’s official home and the U.S. broadcasters who own the rights to every single match.

FIFA Official Website — World Cup 2026

https://www.fifa.com/worldcup

The authoritative source for official match schedules, live results, team rosters, standings, and tournament news directly from the sport’s governing body.

FOX Sports — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.foxsports.com/soccer/fifa-world-cup

The exclusive U.S. English-language broadcast rightsholder, airing all 104 games live on FOX and FS1, with full streaming on Fox One and the Fox Sports app.

ESPN — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.espn.com/soccer/worldcup

Extensive English- and Spanish-language news, analysis, and information coverage across all ESPN platforms, with studio hubs in New York, Bristol, Los Angeles, Mexico City, and multiple U.S. host cities.

Telemundo Deportes — Copa Mundial 2026

https://www.telemundo.com/deportes/copa-mundial-fifa

The official U.S. Spanish-language broadcast partner, delivering full tournament coverage on Telemundo and Universo with streaming available on Peacock.

📺 Tier 2 — Major Sports Networks & Streaming Hubs

The big sports media brands — supplementing their broadcast coverage with deep editorial, scores, and analysis.

ESPN FC — Soccer Hub

https://www.espn.com/soccer

ESPN’s dedicated soccer portal with live scores, highlights, expert predictions, and deep-dive features covering all 48 World Cup teams and their kits, rosters, and group-stage paths.

CBS Sports — Soccer

https://www.cbssports.com/soccer

Major U.S. sports network providing World Cup 2026 news, match coverage, analysis, and scores with streaming access through Paramount+.

NBC Sports / Peacock — Soccer

https://www.nbcsports.com/soccer

U.S. broadcaster offering World Cup 2026 tournament news, analysis, and live match streaming through the Peacock platform.

BBC Sport — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/world-cup

One of the UK’s two official free-to-air broadcast partners, delivering comprehensive global tournament coverage including England’s knockout fixtures via BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

ITV Sport — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.itv.com/sport/football/fifa-world-cup

UK free-to-air broadcaster covering the opening match and England’s group-stage opener, broadcasting live from a New York studio with top-tier punditry throughout the tournament.

📰 Tier 3 — Major General News Outlets with World Cup Hubs

The newspapers and wire services — essential for context, long-form journalism, and breaking news beyond the pitch.

CNN Sport — FIFA World Cup

https://www.cnn.com/sport/fifa-world-cup

CNN’s dedicated World Cup hub delivering breaking tournament news, match results, and ongoing coverage from the network’s global journalism team.

The New York Times / The Athletic — World Cup

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/soccer/world-cup

Premium long-form World Cup journalism from The Athletic, the NYT’s sports division, known for exclusive reporting, tactical analysis, and in-depth player and team features. Note: Some portions may be behind a paywall.

The Guardian — World Cup 2026

https://www.theguardian.com/football/world-cup-2026

The UK’s most respected free-access football journalism, with outstanding match reports, opinion, and long-form World Cup features available without a paywall.

Associated Press — Soccer

https://apnews.com/hub/soccer

The global wire service supplying real-time World Cup match reports and breaking tournament news to hundreds of media outlets worldwide — authoritative and fast.

Reuters — Soccer

https://www.reuters.com/sports/soccer

International wire service providing fast-breaking World Cup match reports, press conference coverage, and tournament news distributed to global media partners.

The Washington Post — Soccer

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/soccer

Major U.S. newspaper offering World Cup 2026 news and features with strong coverage of the U.S. Men’s National Team and the North American host-city experience.

⚽ Tier 4 — Dedicated Soccer & Football Sites

The specialists. If soccer is all you care about, these are your people.

Goal.com

https://www.goal.com/en-us

One of the world’s largest dedicated soccer websites, covering all 48 World Cup teams with match previews, player profiles, USMNT viewing guides, and daily tournament news and analysis.

Sports Illustrated — World Cup 2026

https://www.si.com/soccer/world-cup

SI’s dedicated World Cup hub delivering up-to-the-minute news, match previews, starting lineups, and player ratings throughout all stages of the tournament.

Bleacher Report — World Football

https://bleacherreport.com/world-football

Fast-paced soccer coverage featuring World Cup 2026 news, iconic tournament moments, team updates, and viral content for the global football fan community.

90min — World Cup 2026

https://www.90min.com/world-cup-2026

Youth-oriented global football site delivering World Cup news, team previews, and fast-turnaround match analysis for a digitally native soccer audience.

The Ringer — Soccer

https://www.theringer.com/soccer

Smart, entertaining World Cup analysis, podcasts, and feature writing that bridges the gap between hardcore tactics and broader sports culture.

The Athletic — Soccer / World Cup

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/soccer

Premium subscription sports journalism known for exclusive behind-the-scenes reporting and expert tactical breakdowns of every World Cup 2026 match and storyline.

📊 Tier 5 — Live Scores, Stats & Data Platforms

When you need the score right now — or the xG, pass completion rate, and heat map two minutes after the final whistle.

SofaScore

https://www.sofascore.com

Real-time World Cup 2026 live scores, individual player ratings, heat maps, and detailed in-match statistics across all 104 tournament games.

FotMob — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.fotmob.com

Highly-rated mobile-first soccer app and site offering live World Cup scores, standings, knockout bracket tracking, stats, and aggregated news from multiple sources.

FlashScore — World Cup

https://www.flashscore.com

Live audio commentary, live text match coverage, on-the-ground reporting from across the Americas, and complete live scores for every World Cup 2026 match.

365Scores — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.365scores.com/en-us/football/league/fifa-world-cup-5930

Comprehensive World Cup hub with live scores, full match schedules, standings, player rankings, and in-depth statistics covering all 48 qualified nations.

WhoScored

https://www.whoscored.com

Advanced statistical platform providing detailed World Cup 2026 player ratings, team form analysis, and data-driven match previews and post-match reviews.

Transfermarkt — World Cup 2026

https://www.transfermarkt.us/weltmeisterschaft-2026

The definitive source for player market values, squad depth charts, and transfer history for every nation competing in World Cup 2026.

🌐 Tier 6 — Aggregators, Specialty & Fan Sites

Niche but useful — each one fills a specific gap the major outlets leave open.

NewsNow — FIFA World Cup 2026

https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Football/International/2026+FIFA+World+Cup

Real-time news aggregator pulling World Cup 2026 articles from hundreds of global sources, updated continuously — a single feed for everything published anywhere.

FWC Times — World Cup 2026

Specialty site focused on World Cup 2026 broadcasting rights by territory, streaming options, and viewing guides — essential if you’re trying to watch from outside the U.S.

Major League Soccer — World Cup

https://www.mlssoccer.com

The official MLS site covering the World Cup through the lens of MLS players and clubs, tracking every league player competing in the 2026 tournament.

U.S. Soccer Federation

https://www.ussoccer.com

Official home of the U.S. Men’s and Women’s National Teams, featuring USMNT World Cup 2026 rosters, match schedules, and exclusive player content.


This list will be updated as I can as the tournament progresses, and any new coverage hubs that emerge. If a site you rely on isn’t here, drop it in the comments. The beautiful game deserves beautiful coverage — and now you know where to find it.

— DrWeb | drwebdomain.blog | June 2026

Understanding the Environmental Impacts of Artificial Intelligence – Ithaka S+R

June 9, 2026

Introducing a New LibGuide

By Claire Baytas

As colleges and universities increase their adoption of artificial intelligence, and particularly generative AI, there is a parallel, rising need for AI literacy instruction. Since librarians are experts in information literacy and technology, they are often on the frontlines of providing training in AI literacy. Indeed, this is reflected in Ithaka S+R’s recently published 2025 US Library Survey, where academic library leaders were asked what they anticipate the most significant impacts of AI will be on their libraries. The most common answer, selected by 83 percent of respondents, was increased demand for AI literacy instruction.

Dominant frameworks for AI literacy usually focus on the foundational knowledge learners need to employ AI and understand how it works. The ethical and social implications of AI —including AI’s environmental impacts— are also often included among learner competencies. Librarians, faculty, students, and others across higher education are increasingly and understandably concerned about how widespread adoption of generative AI tools is affecting the climate and the planet broadly speaking. In order for the higher education community to make informed choices about AI tools, AI literacy curricula must address these pressing environmental dimensions of the technology.


Today, we are publishing a LibGuide focused on the Environmental Impacts of AI, as a part of our Incorporating Environmental Perspectives into AI Literacy project, funded by the Mellon Foundation. The LibGuide’s objective is to help users attain a baseline understanding of the varied environmental consequences behind AI technology. The LibGuide’s articles, reports, podcasts, videos, data trackers, and other types of resources address environmental impacts throughout the AI lifecycle. These include energy and water use, emissions, mining, hardware construction, and e-waste, as well as resources about data centers and their effects. The guide also links to research on how AI could be developed more sustainably, tools that track AI’s environmental footprint, policy recommendations, and more.

The LibGuide intends to offer librarians, instructors, and others within the higher education community a gateway for learning more about how AI development and use are impacting the environment. By providing a set of resources that can be inserted within broader AI literacy training, the LibGuide makes it easier for those teaching or learning about AI to include content about AI and the environment. The LibGuide can serve as a launch pad for further research into specific aspects of AI’s environmental impacts, building from the baseline of resources it provides.

The materials in the LibGuide reveal that researchers still do not have a full grasp of AI’s environmental impacts, and opinions vary on how to think about and act on information available to date. Research in this area is evolving rapidly, and estimates from different sources—whether for measurements of emissions, water or energy use, or other impacts—do not always align with each other.

Major technology companies are also not always transparent about resource use and other environmental impacts. Despite these challenges, the resources included in the LibGuide document what we do know about the impacts of widespread AI adoption on the planet.

We are deeply thankful to the four members of our project’s advisory committee who are offering us guidance and feedback on our work. Below, each of these advisors recommends a resource or two from the LibGuide and explains why the resource is important.

Beth Filar Williams, user experience research librarian, Oregon State University Library

If you’re looking for a resource to learn the basics of AI and its environmental impacts, this primer is a great place to start. It covers, in simple language, the energy and water usage, mineral extraction, and GHG emissions related to AI and data centers. It also shares basic information on the lack of transparency disclosures from large AI companies, regulation and policy of various countries, and has a useful glossary of terms along with many cited resources.

Dr. Luccioni, one of the main authors of this primer, is a leading researcher on this topic, making this resource well vetted. If you prefer to listen than read, also consider her 10 minute TED talk that covers the basics but also how we could do it right by considering smaller focused language models than these few huge LLMs which use an incredible amount of resources and are operated by just a handful of companies.

Chris Rabe, program lead, Universal Climate, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Open Learning; Education Program Director, MIT Climate Project

Most new resources on AI rightly focus on the extreme energy and water demands of the data centers that run it. What often gets lost is the labyrinth of material infrastructure at global scales that powers all of computing. In the MIT Case Study The Cloud Is Material: On the Environmental Impacts of Computation and Data Storage, Steven Gonzalez Monserrate uses ethnographic research, personal photography, and a figurative style to “materialize the immaterial” and show that the “cloud” is nothing like a cloud. It is a global infrastructure dependent on rare mineral extraction, undersea fiber optic cables, millions of data servers, vast cooling systems, and endless piles of e-waste.

Reading it is essential for understanding the material consequences of AI, and a powerful reminder that every prompt and query has a physical footprint shaping ecosystems, communities, and economies worldwide.

Eira Tansey, founder and manager of Memory Rising

When engaging with resources to understand the environmental impacts of artificial intelligence, grasping the math and scale around the resource demands can be difficult. This MIT Technology Review, We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard, is one of my favorites I’ve encountered so far for understanding the interactions between data centers and the electrical grid. For visual learners, this essay is both informative and an accessible resource to add to instruction materials.

It’s important to understand the underlying grid concerns that AI is exacerbating. This is where the International Energy Agency (IEA)’s 2025 report Energy and AI is particularly helpful. Different countries around the world have varying forms of clean energy adoption. Unfortunately the United States (where many of the major data centers are currently located with more being built) is behind much of the rest of the world when it comes to renewable energy transition. According to the IEA, “In the United States, data centres account for nearly half of electricity demand growth between now and 2030” (p. 14). This report, and others from the IEA, are important to contextualize the development and adoption of AI within the global energy landscape.

Sarah Tribelhorn, sciences and sustainability librarian, San Diego State University

One standout tool featured in the guide’s “Trackers & Tools” section is EcoLogits. This open-source tool, developed by CodeCarbon, is specifically designed to estimate the energy consumption and environmental footprint of generative AI models. Unlike general trackers, it provides precise estimates for the resource-intensive process of using large-scale models, including electricity, carbon footprint, water, metals and minerals, and fossil fuels. By utilizing EcoLogits, developers and researchers can gain a data-driven understanding of their digital footprint across the AI life cycle. As we move forward, adopting tools like these is a vital step for any organization aiming to balance technological innovation with long-term planetary sustainability.

For more information about our Incorporating Environmental Perspectives into AI Literacy project, please reach out to Claire Baytas (claire.baytas@ithaka.org).

Topics:

Generative AI, Libraries

Tags:

Academic libraries, AI literacy, Generative AI

Continue/Read Original Article: Understanding the Environmental Impacts of Artificial Intelligence – Ithaka S+R

Hemingway, Neighbor and Friend, Part I – The Hemingway Review (THR) Blog

By Alfredo A. Ballester

Part of my childhood education took place at Santana School, located in the town of San Francisco de Paula, Havana, Cuba.

Like many boys from the neighborhood, I used to wander into the nearby estates looking for fruit.

Alfredo A. Ballester as a child in Cuba
Alfredo A. Ballester as a child in Cuba (photograph courtesy of Alfredo A. Ballester

One day, several friends invited me to go eat mangoes at “the American’s” estate, without imagining what would happen. We sneaked past the workers and climbed some of the mango trees.

Suddenly, we saw an old man approaching us. He had white hair and a white beard and carried a long stick in one hand, waving it while shouting things we could not understand. His voice grew louder and more aggressive, and it seemed like he wanted to hit us. I became so frightened that I felt something warm running down my leg all the way to my shoe.

I was not bleeding.

I had wet myself from fear.

This happened at Finca Vigía, and years later we learned that the old man was Hemingway.

Eventually we climbed down from the trees. By then he had calmed down, and we began to understand what he was saying. His conclusion was simple:  “Anyone who wants to eat mangoes from my estate must come through the front gate. No throwing stones. No climbing the trees.”

Some time later, after several other encounters, a friendship had developed between us and “the American.” One day he was even angrier than when he first caught us in the trees. A neighbor had ordered his dogs to attack one of Hemingway’s cats after it supposedly crossed onto his property. The cat was killed.

So “the American” came up with the idea of forming a guerrilla group — and we became part of it — to attack the neighbor’s house with stones.

And that is exactly what we did.

The neighborhood boys were thrilled. We launched the attack almost immediately. The neighbor quickly called the police, and we hid behind tall cane plants while “the American” argued with the officers and protected us by driving them off the property.

As the friendship grew, Hemingway even allowed us inside the house to show us fishing photographs and stuffed animals he kept as trophies.

He never spoke to us about literature.

I remember once asking permission to use the bathroom, and he asked whether I needed to pee or take a shit — using vulgar Cuban slang perfectly. Then he joked that I was always peeing myself.

We were allowed to enter the estate whenever we wanted, though not the house itself. We were privileged. While Hollywood stars like Gary Cooper or Errol Flynn had to schedule appointments to see “the American,” we simply opened the gate and walked in.

                                                                           To be continued . . . 

Alfredo A. Ballester is the author of Ernest Hemingway and the Neighborhood Boys, a book in which he recounts  his personal experiences with “the American”—the celebrated American writer Ernest Hemingway—at Finca Vigía in Havana, Cuba. Born in Cuba, Ballester now lives in Miami, Florida.  He presented an earlier version of this blog post in Spanish, with an accompanying English translation, at the Florida Hemingway Society Virtual Conference on May 30, 2026.

Alfredo A. Ballester 06/09/2026

Works Cited Entry

Ballester, Alfredo A. “Hemingway, Neighbor and Friend, Part I.” THR Blog, The Hemingway Society, 9 June 2026, http://www.hemingwaysociety.org/hemingway-neighbor-and-friend-part-i.

Manhattan Project physicist Richard Feynman’s forgotten notes on ‘the restaurant problem’ deciphered after 50 years – Live Science

  1. Physics & Mathematics

Physicist Richard Feynman’s forgotten notes on ‘the restaurant problem’ finally deciphered after 50 years

Researchers cracked a 50-year-old math problem scribbled by Richard Feynman over lunch. The equations show that humans are better decision-makers than scientists once thought.

Larissa G. Capella's avatar

By Larissa G. Capella, published yesterday, in News

A portrait of Richard Feynman inset in a colorful illustration of a plate and fork
Manhattan Project physicist Richard Feynman (photographed in 1954, inset) couldn’t get through lunch with his friend without trying to optimize their orders with math. Now, researchers have finally deciphered his long-illegible “restaurant problem”. (Image credit: Getty)

It started with a plate of ginger chicken. In the late 1970s, physicist Richard Feynman — best known for his earlier work on the Manhattan Project — sat down for lunch with his friend Ralph Leighton at a restaurant in Glendale, California. Leighton was agonizing over ordering his usual favorite, or risking something new.

Feynman turned the choice into a math problem, and solved it on a piece of notebook paper. His equation showed exactly when Leighton — or any indecisive diner, for that matter — should stop taking risks and stick with what one knows is good.

For decades, Feynman’s notes on the “restaurant problem” were unreadable. But now, researchers reconstructed a decision-making problem from Richard Feynman’s previously undeciphered notes and proved him to be right. The findings were published on June 1 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The problem with picking lunch

Imagine you’re visiting a new city for a week. Each night, you can either try an unknown restaurant or return to the best one you’ve already found. You want to maximize your total dining experience over the whole trip.

That kind of problem has a name in mathematics: an “optimal stopping problem.” The same logic shows up in apartment hunting and job searching. But Feynman argued you can always go back to a previous restaurant. The goal is to maximize your cumulative enjoyment, not just find the single best spot. You may like

    A page of Feynman’s handwritten notes on the Restaurant Problem.
    A page of Feynman’s handwritten notes on the Restaurant Problem.

    Feynman’s notes showed that the optimal strategy involves a quality threshold — a minimum score you require before committing — that starts high and drops as your trip runs out.

    Brian Christian, a computer scientist and cognitive scientist at University of Oxford, began working on the problem about 13 years ago alongside his collaborator Tom Griffiths. They tracked down Feynman’s original notes through the Feynman Lectures website.

    Continue/Read Original Article: Manhattan Project physicist Richard Feynman’s forgotten notes on ‘the restaurant problem’ deciphered after 50 years | Live Science

    ‘Disclosure Day’ is Spielberg’s best film in over 20 years – SF Gate

    Filmmaker shaking hands with a glowing blue alien surrounded by two smaller aliens and a large glowing spaceship in the sky
    A filmmaker meets glowing alien figures amid a scenic twilight setting with a spaceship overhead. AI image by WP AI. (Just for fun!)

    Culture

    ‘Disclosure Day’ is Spielberg’s best film in over 20 years

    Tommy Martinez, Emily Blunt and Josh O’Connor in “Disclosure Day.”
    Tommy Martinez, Emily Blunt and Josh O’Connor in “Disclosure Day.”Universal Pictures and Amblin Entertainment

    By Drew Magary, Columnist, June 9, 2026

    I put a question to my SFGATE colleagues just the other day that had them mulling for a bit: What’s the last great movie that Steven Spielberg directed? I’m not talking about a merely good film. The old man can put together a competent picture anytime he likes. I’m talking about an all-timer of a Spielberg movie, something that belongs up there with his best work, which includes “Jaws,” “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” “E.T.,” “Schindler’s List” and … you get the idea.

    When you’re a director who’s made not just one of the greatest movies of all time but several of them, audience members like me hope for (and oftentimes expect) greatness from you with every subsequent project. Such is the standard that Spielberg, father of the modern blockbuster, set for himself. It’s also a standard that, in my opinion, he has not reached since the release of “Catch Me If You Can,” his note-perfect caper film, back in 2002. The bulk of my colleagues agreed, which led to a much more pointed question: Is Steven Spielberg washed?

    With the release this week of his latest movie, “Disclosure Day,” I can now tell you, the reader, that the answer is no. Steven Spielberg, much to my relief, is still very much Steven Spielberg. This is the best film he’s made in nearly a quarter century. I have no idea if it’ll ascend to the status of an enduring classic — only time gets to decide that—but goddamn, what a movie.



    If you’re unfamiliar with the premise of “Disclosure Day,” perhaps because it has a clunky title that reminds viewers like me of that one time Demi Moore sexually harassed Michael Douglas, I can get you situated real quick (and relatively spoiler-free). Steven Spielberg has made another movie about extraterrestrials. That’s really all you need to know, isn’t it?

    You know that Spielberg is in his element when he’s spinning a yarn about little green men from outer space. It’s a subject that aligns perfectly with his directorial sensibilities: the wonder of the unknown, the idea that we are not alone, kids who have serious daddy issues, things of that nature. So long as you’re not watching “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,” you know that your alien story is in good hands with this man.

    This time around, our story is about Daniel Kellner (rising star Josh O’Connor), a pencil-pusher at a shadowy defense corporation who opens the film having stolen a precious MacGuffin, among other things, from his boss Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth). You know what big meanies the men in suits are in a Spielberg flick. Firth, operating at peak Colin Firth, plays his character no different. Scanlon wants his MacGuffin back and sends out a legion of underlings in black cars to capture Kellner and blow stuff up real good.

    Read more: ‘Disclosure Day’ is Spielberg’s best film in over 20 years – SF Gate

    Continue/Read Original Article: ‘Disclosure Day’ is Spielberg’s best film in over 20 years

    What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years – IFLScience

    space-iconSpace and Physicsspace-iconAstronomy

    Satellite antenna at a ground station.
    Satellite antenna at a ground station.Image credit: woodvillage / shutterstock.com

    clock-iconPUBLISHED Yesterday

    Global “Post-Detection Protocols” For Disclosing Alien Life Just Got Their First Major Update In 16 Years – “No Reply Should Be Sent”

    James Felton headshot

    By James Felton, Senior Staff Writer

    James is a published author with multiple pop-history and science books to his name. He specializes in history, space, strange science, and anything out of the ordinary. View full profile

    Katy Evans headshot

    Edited by Katy Evans



    The “post-detection protocols” for announcing the discovery and existence of alien life have just had their first major update in 16 years, though the all-important “no reply” rule remains in place.

    The universe is a pretty big place, and humans have only recently begun scouring it for signs of other intelligent lifeforms. While so far all we have heard is a great and eerie silence, there remains the chance that as our telescopes and understanding of the universe improve, we may one day find what we are looking for; signs of an alien intelligence, out there in the cosmos.

    What should we do about it if we were to detect such a sign, be it a directed signal from a technological species, or telltale bio signatures on a distant exoplanet? What steps should scientists take next? 

    “We do not shout ‘alien’ the moment we see a strange blip”

    These are questions that the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the broader search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) institute have put their minds to, first creating the “Declaration of Principles Concerning the Conduct of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence” in 1989. These guidelines lay out what scientists should do at each stage of a detection, including how these findings should be communicated to the public. That latter task has gotten more difficult in recent years, and it was this area that had the greatest overhaul in the new 2026 update.

    “The information environment we operate in today is vastly more complex than it was in 2010,” Professor Michael Garrett, Chair of the IAA SETI Committee and professor of astrophysics at the University of Manchester, explained in a statement

    “In an era of deepfakes, automated misinformation, and instant global connectivity, unverified claims could trigger confusion or panic. These new protocols guide SETI scientists in maintaining the highest standards of evidence before making announcements to the world.” 

    The guidance states that safeguards should be established for scientists involved in potential detections, who may face harassment or doxxing due to their involvement. Meanwhile, they establish the need to manage “viral” rumors about detections and potential detections, and the complex task of distinguishing the truth from potential hoaxes.

    Overall the guidelines remain roughly the same, adhering to Carl Sagan’s principle that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” The first step, as with previous guidance, is to verify any candidate detection of alien life and to seek independent examination of evidence by other organizations, preferably using other methods and instruments.

    “We do not shout ‘alien’ the moment we see a strange blip,” Garrett added. “The scientific method demands we check, check again, and then ask others to check. Only when we have reached a consensus that a signal is credible do we bring it to the world.” 

    Nevertheless, these updated guidelines are not as prohibitory as the previous iteration, released before the rise of social media, in 2010. In the update, it is explained that scientists have no obligation to disclose verification efforts until a discovery is made, including through the media, and on social media. However, scientists should make use of these channels and respond to reasonable requests, the guidance states, though they should clearly identify speculative or unconfirmed conclusions as such.

    “If a candidate technosignature is discovered, communication about ongoing observations and analyses may be necessary to dispel rumors and provide accurate and reliable information,” the declaration states. “Similarly, if analysis determines that a previously reported candidate technosignature is not extraterrestrial in origin, this should be promptly disclosed and clearly communicated.”

    When a verification is made, the scientists involved are then obliged to report their discovery promptly “in a full, complete and open manner to the public, the scientific community, and the Secretary General of the United Nations.”

    Scientists should also take steps to protect the evidence of a detection, according to the updated guidelines. This could be in the form of protecting certain frequencies, for example, if the evidence came in the form of an electromagnetic signal. 

    Read more: What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years – IFLScience

    Continue/Read Original Article: What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years | IFLScience

    House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

    Congress

    Bill would also split off hiring of copyright office head, giving the president control

    Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., leaves a meeting of the House Republican Conference at the Capitol Hill Club in March. The House on Monday passed his bill that would change how the librarian of Congress is appointed.
    Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., leaves a meeting of the House Republican Conference at the Capitol Hill Club in March. The House on Monday passed his bill that would change how the librarian of Congress is appointed. (Tom Williams / CQ Roll Call)

    By Nina Heller, Posted June 8, 2026 at 4:32pm

    House lawmakers passed a bill Monday aimed at preventing future executive branch interference in some legislative branch agencies, a year after President Donald Trump fired the librarian of Congress.

    It would allow House and Senate leaders to appoint the heads of both the Library of Congress and the Government Publishing Office, removing that power from the president. 

    But the president would get new appointment authority over another role, the register of copyrights. Historically part of the Library of Congress, the Copyright Office has long drawn debate over its proper place.

    The bill was passed by a voice vote. Now it heads to the Senate, where it would need enough bipartisan support to overcome a filibuster. 

    “At its core, this bill is about ensuring that agencies of the legislative branch are governed in a manner consistent with our constitutional system, improving continuity in leadership and strengthening congressional oversight,” Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., the lead sponsor, said on the floor Monday.

    While the firing of Librarian Carla Hayden put the issue in the spotlight last year, Griffith said he was taking a longer view.

    “I feel like doing that disclaimer at the end of a movie: This has nothing to do with any current or former librarians of Congress, or any current or former members of the White House,” he said at a House Administration Committee markup last month. 

    It’s not the first time lawmakers have sought to change how heads of legislative branch agencies are hired and fired. In 2023, lawmakers approved a change that revoked the president’s power to appoint the architect of the Capitol, transferring that authority to Congress instead. 

    And in 2017, Virginia Republican Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who was then chair of the House Judiciary Committee, proposed allowing the president to appoint the register of copyrights with input from a congressional panel and with the advice and consent of the Senate. In the past, the librarian of Congress has picked the head of the Copyright Office. That bill passed the House but stalled in the other chamber.

    Proponents of splitting off the copyright office from the Library of Congress say it’s the right approach because much of its work is executive in nature. The office both advises Congress on intellectual property issues and administers copyright laws.

    Goodlatte has remained engaged with the issue since leaving Congress and has lobbied on behalf of the Walt Disney Company around Griffith’s bill, according to disclosures

    But not everyone is happy with the proposal, with some arguing it could potentially politicize copyright and artificial intelligence governance issues. After Trump ousted Hayden last May, he also moved to fire Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter, shortly after her office published a draft report warning about AI models being trained on copyrighted materials and the effects on fair use law. Perlmutter has challenged her firing in court. 

    A number of technology, library and public interest groups have come out against the bill and its plan for the copyright office, saying it “threatens to upend a system that has protected and supported American creativity and ingenuity for centuries.” 

    “Maintaining institutional unity through challenges such as emerging AI policy and DMCA rulemakings is vital to ensuring copyright evolution remains balanced, accessible, and ready to support the next generation of creators and tech innovators,” Brandon Butler, executive director of the Re:Create Coalition, said in a statement Monday. 

    The coalition, which includes groups like the American Library Association and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, had previously written a letter to House Administration Committee members criticizing a lack of hearings on the topic.

    Read more: House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

    Continue/Read Original Article: House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

    “Burning Down The House” – David Byrne feat. Stephen Colbert (LIVE on The Late Show) – YouTube

    Editor’s Note: I watched the final The Late Show episode from my TiVDo, and the final music act was great.. CBS, in the censorship game, removes him from the show, cancelled it. –DrWeb

    Original Source: “Burning Down The House” – David Byrne feat. Stephen Colbert (LIVE on The Late Show) – YouTube

    Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

    Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS

    By Brian Tyler Cohen, June 4, 2026

    NEW YORK, NY – NOVEMBER 07: Journalist Scott Pelley speaks onstage at the annual Freedom Award Benefit hosted by the International Rescue Committee at The Waldorf-Astoria on November 7, 2012 in New York City. (Photo by Michael Loccisano / Getty Images for IRC)

    This administration’s assault on the media has been relentless. I’d like to say it’s also shocking in the sheer scale of it, but honestly, I’m not surprised. Since Day One of Trump’s second term, he’s been demanding that media companies pay him tens of millions of dollars (Paramount, ABC, Disney), and demanding the firing of late-night hosts who hurt his feelings. These were all red flags. But Scott Pelley’s firing from “60 Minutes” this week is the one that stopped me cold.

    Pelley was terminated Tuesday after confronting new executive producer Nick Bilton — a man with, in Pelley’s words, “slender” qualifications for the job — about the recent firings of longtime “60 Minutes” producers. When Pelley met with Bari Weiss and Bilton and asked for answers, they stonewalled him for ten minutes. He was fired the next day. Bilton’s termination letter claimed Pelley had “hijacked” a staff meeting. Pelley called Weiss’ public account of their falling out “disingenuous.”

    This is what the end of an institution looks like. Weiss was installed at CBS News as a compliant mouthpiece for the Trump-allied Ellisons, who bought Paramount and now need government approval for a merger that would also hand them control of CNN. Government collaborators are on the verge of controlling a massive share of American news, and they’re pushing out the journalists who won’t play along. First, Anderson Cooper walked away, then came the firings of Tanya Simon, Cecilia Vega, Sharyn Alfonsi and now Pelley. The institutional knowledge lost in the brain drain will irreparably damage an American institution. 

    I wrote about this in my book, “The Day After,” putting it in the full historical context it deserves. This is an exclusive excerpt. 


    Under Trump’s second coming, the Foxification of the media has accelerated. Media companies are not just acquiescing to Trump’s coercion; they are actively turning themselves into a pale imitation of a Roger Ailes creation.

    The leader of the pack is Skydance Media, which in August 2025 bought Paramount in an $8 billion deal that includes the movie studios, the CBS broadcast network, and Paramount’s cable channels such as Comedy Central and Nickelodeon. The deal sailed through the FCC approval process because Brendan Carr had already shaken down his targets.

    In particular, he was ready to take his metaphorical baseball bat to CBS News because of a discrepancy between two edits of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in the final weeks of the 2024 presidential campaign. The difference between the two interviews was microscopic. But it was all Trump needed to claim that he’d been the victim of a great media conspiracy. Even less than the ABC News error, the CBS News edit was barely worthy of a clarification, never mind a correction. The slim pickings didn’t deter Trump from filing a $20 billion lawsuit — that’s billion with a b — against CBS and Paramount in October 2024.

    Read more: Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

    Continue/Read Original Article: Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

    Why the years seem to speed up as we age, and how focusing on one thing might make time feel slower again – Space Daily

    Mind & Meaning

    Illustration of Chronos holding an hourglass and key and Kairos holding scales and a dagger highlighting time concepts
    An artistic contrast between Chronos representing linear time and Kairos symbolizing the right moment. Image by WP AI.

    Why the years seem to speed up as we age, and how focusing on one thing might make time feel slower again

    In the 19th century, a French philosopher called Paul Janet proposed that time appears to accelerate by the proportion of life already lived.

    By Mal James · Editorial process

    Published June 6, 2026

    Why the years seem to speed up as we age, and how focusing on one thing might make time feel slower again

    In the 19th century, a French philosopher called Paul Janet proposed that time appears to accelerate by the proportion of life already lived. A year for a ten-year-old is one-tenth of everything they know. The same year for a forty-year-old is one-fortieth. The math is simple. Each year is a smaller fraction of the whole than the one before it.

    The proportional theory has held up for over a century because it captures something true in the abstract. It just doesn’t quite capture what we actually feel, which is less a calculation than a texture. Some years feel enormous. Others feel like they came and went without leaving much of a mark. The arithmetic alone doesn’t explain the difference.

    The neuroscientist David Eagleman has offered a second account that sits next to Janet’s, and I find it the more relevant of the two. As we age, he writes, “you develop more compressed representations of events, and the memories to be read out are correspondingly impoverished. When you are a child, and everything is novel, the richness of the memory gives the impression of increased time passage.” Novelty makes memories dense. Routine makes them thin. Time is less a clock than a record, and the record thins when the days repeat.

    I think about this when I look back at my own life. The year of adult life that feels longest to me in retrospect is my first year in Vietnam. Everything was new — the city, the noise, the food, the language, the person I was becoming. I can still reach inside that year and pull out scenes I haven’t thought about in a decade. The years since have not been less full. They have been less novel, and they have stacked into one another the way similar weeks do. Some of that is the math. Much of it, I suspect, is the memory.

    If that’s right, then the speeding-up isn’t really about age. It’s about familiarity. And familiarity has a couple of levers.

    The obvious one is novelty: change the city, change the route, change the work. Eagleman’s prescription is roughly that simple — keep introducing things the brain hasn’t seen before. That works, and I’ve felt it work. But it isn’t always available. Much of life is lived in roughly the same rooms.

    The less obvious lever, and the one that interests me more, is probably attention. For me focusing properly on a single thing seems to do something similar to novelty. When I sit with one piece of writing for a long stretch and let it actually have me, the afternoon comes back to me later with edges. The hours have shape. The same hours spent skating between tabs and notifications and half-finished thoughts don’t come back at all. They’re gone before they ended.

    This is not news to anyone who has lost an evening to a phone. What’s interesting is the inverse — that depth of attention, not just freshness of input, can also produce the dense memories Eagleman is describing. Novelty pulls the brain into a new mode because it can’t predict what’s coming next. Sustained attention does something like the same thing from the other direction: it forces a closer look at material the brain would otherwise smooth over and forget. Either way you get the texture back.

    I’m not entirely sure what to do with this beyond the obvious. The years that have felt longest to me, on either reading, have been the ones where I either showed up somewhere completely new or stayed with one thing long enough to notice it. The years that have blurred have been the ones where I did neither — where I was busy without being attentive, and where each week looked enough like the last that the brain didn’t bother filing them separately.

    Read more: Why the years seem to speed up as we age, and how focusing on one thing might make time feel slower again – Space Daily

    Continue/Read Original Article: Why the years seem to speed up as we age, and how focusing on one thing might make time feel slower again

    Don’t Let Your Wound Become Your Story – Psychology Today

    Post-Traumatic Growth

    Don’t Let Your Wound Become Your Story

    Why some remain stuck in their suffering and others find a way forward.

    Posted June 2, 2026 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

    THE BASICS

    Key points

    • Defining ourselves by a painful event can provide a simple explanation for a complicated situation.
    • The challenge comes when the wound becomes our identity, and we don’t work to heal.
    • Finding meaning can turn your worst chapter into a first chapter.

    Life wounds each of us. No one is exempt. While we don’t choose our hardships, we do get to choose whether they become our identity.

    A decade ago, I was mired in pain after an avalanche of traumatizing revelations upended my three-decade marriage. As I walked away from it, I had a choice to make. I could surrender to the narrative that my life had been shattered by forces beyond my control and wallow in the muck of how badly I had been wronged—true by any measure. Or I could choose to feel the burn, rail, cry, grieve what was lost, dust myself off, and then mine the wreckage for life lessons, dark humor, and the possibility of new chapters.

    We each have that choice when confronted with cataclysmic events. I chose not to see myself as powerless and allow someone else’s actions to define my life story. Instead, I focused on what remained within my control and began crafting a new story to make sense of the chaos.

    We all know someone whose identity is rooted in a past wound. Their identity becomes tangled in painful experiences inflicted by others or shaped by bad luck. They view life as something that happened to them rather than something shaped through their choices.

    Some remain trapped in that narrative for years, allowing past events to diminish their joy and shape their present. Others who have faced similar circumstances work to find their way out of the maze. What accounts for this difference?

    Researchers have several theories. First, for some, defining ourselves by a painful event can provide a simple explanation for a complicated situation. It spares us from probing difficult questions about what we can learn or change. Second, it offers certainty. The story is clear: Someone did us wrong, and we suffer the consequences. Third, suffering often draws support and sympathy: Friends check in, validate our pain, and bring soup, all of which is deeply healing.

    The challenge comes when the wound becomes our identity, and we don’t work to heal. In this instance, adversity ceases to be something that happened to us and becomes how we see ourselves. Rather than emerging from the crisis with new wisdom, perspective, and resilience, we can remain tethered to the injury, allowing it to define our lives long after the event itself has passed.

    What Is Your Tendency?

    Psychologists have long been interested in why some people remain stuck in painful experiences while others find a way forward. One tool they use is the Tendency for Interpersonal Victimhood Scale, which measures four traits commonly associated with a tendency to remain focused on perceived injuries:

    1. A need for recognition, including seeking validation and sympathy from others for one’s suffering
    2. Moral elitism, the tendency to view oneself as morally superior to others
    3. Rumination, repetitive thinking that focuses on pain and injustice rather than solutions or growth
    4. Reduced empathy, difficulty recognizing or appreciating the suffering and perspectives of others
    Read more: Don’t Let Your Wound Become Your Story – Psychology Today

    Continue/Read Original Article: Don’t Let Your Wound Become Your Story | Psychology Today

    Tired of AI making stuff up? This assistant only answers from peer‑reviewed research – Android Authority

    General technology, AI

    Tired of AI making stuff up? This assistant only answers from peer‑reviewed research

    Planning trips or degoogling your notes? These fresh AI apps are also worth a look.

    By June 5, 2026

    consensus ai hub 1

    Generative AI is everywhere, whether it’s used as a cornerstone of a service, used to build apps, or employed to boost functionality within them. But with so many new products appearing all the time, which ones are worth checking out?

    We’re here to help with a new regular series covering the best and freshest AI apps and services that you should know about.

    Catch our previous edition of new AI apps and services here

    If you’d like your app or service to be considered for future editions of this series or have found an app worthy of inclusion, reach out to us via email or drop a comment down below. Alternatively, to ensure your app gets showcased for all our wonderful readers to see, get in touch with our partnerships team!

    If you value peer-reviewed data, you’ll love this smart AI assistant

    consensus screenshot 1

    One of the biggest problems AI assistants face is the broad set of “knowledge” they’re trained on. It’s why you’ll find one referencing that glue is particularly tasty on pizza, or nonexistent legal cases. While these hallucinations have become less ridiculous over time, they’re now far sneakier and tougher to identify with a weary eye. It’s why I’ve started including Consensus in my workflow whenever possible.

    Consensus answers the question, “What if Google Scholar were an AI assistant?” by combing through millions of peer-reviewed research papers to provide a broad overview of various topics. This makes scholarly content far more accessible to the common user who might not have the time or mental acuity to read papers from cover to cover.

    What if Google Scholar were an AI assistant?

    It doesn’t just lay out the facts, either, but highlights references in a separate pane neatly numbered to correspond with the details in the response. After reading its key takeaway, I can click a reference to get an overview of the paper, view the metadata, or download the full document if it’s available.

    Notably, Consensus can be used without an account, which is a huge positive given that many other AI products impose this requirement, though logging in does open up certain benefits. For one, the AI offers a far deeper literature review for members, and various other methods for weighing up data scattered across multiple papers via a Consensus Meter. If you’re looking to win a particularly heated science-based argument, this is how you do it.

    Of course, given Consensus’s focus on peer-reviewed research, it’s not exactly a direct foil to Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini. That’s not really its intent, though. I certainly wish Consensus was available when I was at university, back when Zotero was the most powerful tool on my Celeron laptop.

    Try Consensus: https://consensus.app/

    Continue/Read Original Article: Tired of AI making stuff up? This assistant only answers from peer‑reviewed research – Android Authority

    Morley Safer of 60 Minutes was my father. He would be disgusted by what Bari Weiss is doing to CBS – Sarah Safer – The Guardian

    Broadcast journalist Morley Safer in his office at CBS TV in 1978.Photograph: Carl Mydans /Getty Images

    Opinion, CBS

    Morley Safer of 60 Minutes was my father. He would be disgusted by what Bari Weiss is doing to CBS

    By Sarah Safer, Fri 5 Jun 2026 07.00 EDT

    My father joined the program when I was eight months old and retired 46 years later. He would be encouraging journalists at CBS to speak out

    The end of the 60 Minutes broadcast as we know it has sickened millions of longtime viewers, colleagues, and all of us who are offended and threatened by our current administration and its cronies’ assaults on the first amendment. The news of Scott Pelley’s firing hits particularly hard. He spoke of “risking my life and the happiness of my family because of my devotion to the broadcast”.

    Having literally grown up with that broadcast – my father, Morley Safer, joined the program when I was eight months old and retired 46 years later – I am acutely aware of the costs of that devotion. 60 Minutes, particularly in its early days, demanded commitments of time and travel that were keenly felt at home.

    I have early memories of trying to speak to my dad through the TV on Sunday nights while he was away for weeks at a time. Most of the other 60 Minutes children weren’t treated to a weekly sighting: its producers, crew and fixers in faraway places all made the same sacrifices.

    I imagine their families feel similar grief in the wake of the news from CBS, and Washington’s broader attacks on the first amendment. The most trusted and esteemed program in American journalism, the legacy of our loved ones’ hard work and its accompanying sacrifices on the home front, has, in Pelley’s words, been murdered.

    Over the years, I’d ask my dad if his occasional sharp criticism of the CBS brass or its sponsors was wise. His usual response was: “What are they going to do? Fire me?” This week we learned that under CBS’s current regime, the answer would be yes. While organizing his papers after his death in 2016, I found copies of letters that if written today would likely threaten his job. “You have ruined this company,” he wrote to Larry Tisch in 1990, a couple of years after Tisch famously slashed the news division’s budget and fired hundreds of staffers in the name of cost-cutting.

    “Our News Divisions Presidents were once statesmen in broadcasting. Today they are sloppy, muddled little errand boys,” he wrote. Fifteen years later, he warned the CEO of CBS that the changes being brought to the newsroom “suggest[s] some form of designer-news, or happy-talk that would by its very nature drive out the kind of information the country needs to have at one of the most dangerous periods in its history.”

    Like Pelley, he would have called out the bullies who are decimating the broadcast today. I can imagine him, a cigarette hanging from his mouth, likening the current head of CBS News to a Soviet apparatchik doing the bidding of the central committee.

    My father built his reputation as a war correspondent for CBS News. In 1965, he reported on the Marine Corps’ burning of Cam Ne, a Vietnamese village. The scene of a Zippo lighter igniting a thatched roof while defenseless elderly men and women begged for mercy became an iconic image of the US military’s excesses in Vietnam, and is credited with changing the course of the war. When the piece aired, then president Lyndon Johnson accused CBS of “shitting on the American flag”, suggesting that my father, a Canadian, was a traitor and a communist.

    Johnson falsely claimed to have evidence of my father’s communist ties and called on Frank Stanton, the head of CBS News, to fire him. Stanton called his bluff, but under our current leadership, both in Washington and at CBS, it’s not hard to imagine that if this happened today, my father’s green card would be revoked and his career at CBS would be finished. That is, if the story even made it on air.

    My dad wasn’t sure about an afterlife and neither am I, but after the decimation of 60 Minutes, I like to imagine that he is still hanging around. To his colleagues’ dismay, he was famous for flouting the rules around smoking. If anyone at CBS News smells smoke in an edit room, or another place they shouldn’t, my dad is surely haunting it, encouraging those who carry on his legacy and, let’s hope, making trouble for the brass.

    • Sarah Safer is the daughter of Morley Safer, who was a 60 Minutes correspondent for 46 years

    Continue/Read Original Article: Morley Safer of 60 Minutes was my father. He would be disgusted by what Bari Weiss is doing to CBS | Sarah Safer | The Guardian

    America’s first public university is also its flagship – The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – University News

    University News

    America’s first public university is also its flagship

    Carolina’s history parallels that of the United States, and the University is a leading example of the good public institutions can produce.

    Story by Brennan Doherty and video by John Roberts, University Communications and Marketing, Friday, June 5th, 2026

    The 250-year history of the United States runs parallel to the history of UNC-Chapel Hill.

    In the same year the nation declared its independence, North Carolina’s first constitution called for state-supported schools, including universities.

    Carolina’s charter dates to 1789, the year the U.S. Constitution was signed and George Washington took the first presidential oath of office.

    “You could study the history of UNC, and it’s like studying American history in a microcosm,” said Nicholas Graham, University archivist.

    The birthplace of public higher education, Carolina opened its doors to students in 1795 and was the sole public university to award degrees in the 18th century.

    But beyond being a historic first, Carolina has for centuries served as a leading model for all other universities across the nation in public service, research, innovation and affordability, illustrating how a public institution should support its home state and its people.

    From preparing the nation’s top healthcare professionals and conducting groundbreaking research to producing business leaders, cultural and sporting icons and even a president, Carolina is at the heart of America.

    The public good pursued by Tar Heels fuels North Carolina as well as the nation at large.

    “That means being first in ways that matter beyond our own campus — opening doors for students, advancing discoveries that improve lives and serving the state whose name we bear,” said Chancellor Lee H. Roberts. “Carolina’s history is extraordinary, but its true measure is what that history makes possible for North Carolina and for the nation.”

    Students participating in physical training at Bowman-Grey pool during the 1940s.

    Cadets in the U.S. Navy’s pre flight training program training at Bowman Gray Memorial Pool. (UNC-Chapel Hill)

    Preparing American heroes

    When Graham thinks about Carolina’s biggest contributions to the U.S., his mind immediately goes to how the University helped the nation’s soldiers prepare for two world wars. During World War I, the University hosted the Student Army Training Corps, and during World War II, Carolina was one of just four universities nationwide to host the U.S. Navy’s intensive six-week pre flight training program.

    “Over the course of three years, more than 20,000 people came through Chapel Hill,” including future President George H.W. Bush and National Baseball Hall of Fame member Ted Williams, Graham said.

    “That was a huge impact on campus, both the physical campus and all the services. It was a tremendous logistical effort for the University to be able to host that number of people and to be able to accommodate all the things they needed to do.”

    Astronauts Ed White and Jim McDivitt training at Morehead Planetarium and Science Center.

    Carolina also played a major role in helping the nation become a world leader in space exploration.

    Before the historic Apollo 11 mission to the moon, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins spent 125-plus hours learning celestial navigation at Morehead Planetarium and Science Center, the South’s oldest planetarium.

    “The planetarium’s director, Tony Jenzano, proposed this to NASA, and then UNC astronomers designed the curriculum,” Graham said. “It was an idea that came out of Chapel Hill: that astronauts going into space really needed to learn how to navigate by the stars in case of equipment failure.”

    In the 21st century, Carolina is still preparing astronauts like Zena Cardman ’10, ’14 (MA), commander of SpaceX Crew-11, who completed their mission in January 2026.

    Cardman shows that Tar Heels continue a legacy of shaping the future.

    Carolina’s research timeline spans a century of innovations, from the life-changing commercialization of calcium carbide in 1893 to lifesaving HIV discoveries.

    In the sporting world, everybody knows Michael Jordan and Mia Hamm, but today’s greats like Erin Matson, Drake Maye and Chloe Humphrey continued to develop in Chapel Hill at the University of National Champions.

    Anson Dorrance in a white U.S. Soccer collared shirt holding a gold World Cup trophy and Mia Hamm in her Carolina soccer uniform holding two trophies for soccer awards she won.

    Mia Hamm, considered the greatest women’s soccer player of all time, played for Anson Dorrance on the U.S. National Team and at Carolina. Hamm won four NCAA titles, two World Cups and was twice on Olympic Gold Medal-winning teams. (Carolina Athletics)

    Perhaps the most important constant at Carolina, the No. 1 best value public for 21 straight years, has been a commitment to being accessible to all. This affordability aligns with the North Carolina Constitution’s requirement that “the University of North Carolina and other public institutions of higher education, as far as practicable, be extended to the people of the State free of expense.”

    For Tar Heels, excellence and affordability aren’t mutually exclusive — an ideal all Americans can get behind.

    First. And For All.


    Learn how Tar Heels are taking the first steps to momentous change across the state, nation and world.

    Categories History and Traditions, Military and Veterans, Serving N.C., University News, University Within Reach

    Continue/Read Original Article: America’s first public university is also its flagship – The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Cognitive Surrender With AI Was Just the Beginning – Psychology Today

    Silhouette of a human figure surrounded by glowing neural network circuits and algorithmic data graphics
    An abstract digital representation of a human figure integrated with neural network circuitry and data flow visuals. Generated by WP AI.
    Artificial Intelligence

    Cognitive Surrender With AI Was Just the Beginning

    Posted June 4, 2026 | Reviewed by Michelle Quirk

    Key points

    • Cognitive surrender with AI may be just the beginning.
    • Frictionless emotional support can reshape what real relationships feel like.
    • The problem won’t be the technology; it will be us.
    Gary Ross / Pixabay
    Source: Gary Ross / Pixabay

    My recent post on cognitive surrender generated more response than almost anything I’ve written recently. I think it’s because people recognized something uncomfortably familiar in themselves. The shift of difficult thinking to artificial intelligence (AI)—the preference for frictionless answers over human cognitive efforts—had struck a nerve, or perhaps a neuron.

    This recognition made me wonder whether the same erosion was occurring somewhere else—in how we relate, not just how we think.

    When Human Connection Starts to Feel Like the Problem

    I think it’s fair to say that human relationships are complicated because we humans are complicated. People misunderstand us as they bring their assumptions and distractions into every interaction. Yet much of what makes relationships meaningful emerges from precisely these imperfections. A close friendship is rarely built on perfect understanding but the process of understanding itself. This effort isn’t incidental to the relationship. In many ways, it is the relationship.

    It’s my contention that AI offers a very different experience. When people turn to AI for emotional support, it responds patiently and without any clear judgement. There’s a seamless engagement with no interruption or competing priorities. For many people, this can be genuinely useful. AI can help organize thoughts and even manage anxiety.

    The concern here isn’t those benefits. It’s that repeated exposure to frictionless emotional support may gradually alter our expectations of what emotional support should feel like.

    Human expectations are adaptive. We acclimate to new conditions and begin treating them as normal. Think about what that means here. After enough interactions with a large language model that never judges you or has a bad day, the engagement doesn’t feel optimal but deficient.

    The Relationship That Requires Nothing

    Every meaningful human relationship requires something from us. And even the healthiest relationships create obligations. We accept them because they are built into our human nature of belonging. Caring for another person has always involved some degree of compromise and some degree of emotional reciprocity.

    AI operates differently, in a way that’s almost antithetical to human emotion. AI doesn’t become frustrated and doesn’t need comfort. This exchange is fundamentally asymmetrical. We receive attention and validation, but nothing is required in return.

    Spend enough time in a relationship that asks nothing of you, and you can get a clear sense of this asymmetry. The issue isn’t that people consciously choose AI over other human beings but that repeated interaction with something that requires nothing may gradually recalibrate our tolerance for relationships that do. And carried to an extreme, what once felt like the ordinary work of caring for another person starts to feel like an inefficiency. This dynamic aligns with the cognitive surrender we are seeing now—cognitive work feels too inefficient or difficult.

    The Trap of Emotional Surrender

    What makes this difficult to recognize is that it doesn’t show up as loss. It shows up as improvement. AI leaves us calmer and perhaps more settled. By most measures, the experience is positive.

    Read more: Cognitive Surrender With AI Was Just the Beginning – Psychology Today

    Continue/Read Original Article: Cognitive Surrender With AI Was Just the Beginning | Psychology Today

    Researchers say a new Trump rule could destroy American science as we know it – CNN

    Climate, 5 min read

    Researchers say this new Trump rule could destroy American science as we know it. They’re fighting back

    By Ella Nilsen and Andrew Freedman, Jun 4, 2026

    Researchers measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at the UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California on April 11, 2025. A new rule proposed by the Trump administration would put federal funding for scientific research in the hands of political appointees, likely cutting off money for studies of climate change and other topics the administration ideologically opposes.
    Researchers measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at the UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California on April 11, 2025. A new rule proposed by the Trump administration would put federal funding for scientific research in the hands of political appointees, likely cutting off money for studies of climate change and other topics the administration ideologically opposes. Patrick T. Fallon /AFP / Getty Images.

    Researchers measure carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at the UC San Diego Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, California on April 11, 2025. A new rule proposed by the Trump administration would put federal funding for scientific research in the hands of political appointees, likely cutting off money for studies of climate change and other topics the administration ideologically opposes. Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

    Scientists across multiple disciplines are sounding the alarm after the White House proposed taking greater control over how scientific research gets funded and allowing political appointees to decide whether to approve scientific grants.

    Critics of the proposed rule say it would codify the administration’s attempts to destroy the scientific research enterprise in the US that has led to remarkable discoveries on treating cancer, HIV and rare diseases — as well as understanding weather and climate science and developing artificial intelligence. It could have far-reaching implications on what kinds of research topics get studied in the first place.

    One of the main casualties in OMB’s proposal would be the country’s longstanding scientific peer review process for grantmaking. Peer review has been widely used since the post-World War II research boom, and relies on panels of experts in their fields judging federal funding decisions on the scientific merit of the grant proposals, rather than any politically-motivated criteria.

    • The forecast is just the beginning. We’ll send you expert coverage and the stories behind the weather — so you always know more than just the number. Sign up for the newsletter

    The proposed rule would also ban research on diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as gender, and stop federally funded international scientific collaborations. And OMB’s changes could target more than scientific research — applying to other federal grant awards from agencies to state and local governments.

    “This proposal does not just apply to scientific research funding, it applies to other federal awards in all kinds of contexts,” said Stanford Law School professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette.

    Kate Marvel, a climate scientist who recently left NASA due to political interference in climate-science research there, said peer review has long been an enabler of America’s scientific leadership.

    “One of the reasons the USA has historically been such a research superpower is that we’ve had a merit-based science funding system, where research is funded by the federal government based on the assessments of other scientists,” she said.

    “The system wasn’t perfect, but it wasn’t stupid,” Marvel added. “Putting uninformed political hacks in charge of it is deeply stupid.”

    Continue/Read Original Article: Researchers say a new Trump rule could destroy American science as we know it | CNN

    These Are the 10 Happiest States for Retirees in the U.S. – Travel & Leisure

    These Are the 10 Happiest States for Retirees in the U.S.

    New Jersey, Connecticut, and South Dakota lead the rankings for senior well-being.

    By Kristine Hansen, Published on June 4, 2026

    1 Comment

    A retired couple smiling and walking arminarm along a beach
    A happy couple enjoying a walk on the beach. Credit: kate_sept2004/Getty Images

    Sun-drenched destinations like Florida and Arizona have always been popular places to retire, but a new study found the East Coast state of New Jersey was actually where retirees are happiest.

    Named the Garden State for its agricultural and farming history, New Jersey also provides easy access to beaches, parks, and culture, according to the study that was shared with Travel + Leisure from the Legacy Healing Center, a collection of luxury rehab centers across the United States. The state boasts the lowest senior suicide rate in the country along with the lowest prevalence of senior depression at just 10 percent. The state also ranks third for life expectancy and third for overall happiness.

    “Retirement isn’t just about warmer weather, lower taxes or moving closer to family,” Legacy Healing Center wrote in a statement shared with T+L. “New research suggests the happiest retirement years may depend more on mental health, life expectancy, social connection and whether older adults have access to support in their communities.”

    Landing in second place was another East Coast juggernaut in Connecticut, which the report found had the highest life expectancy of all states it looked at, ranked fourth for overall happiness, and ranked fifth for the number of senior centers available per 100,000 seniors.

    States considered popular with retirees like Florida came in lower on the list. The Sunshine State, for example, didn’t even crack the top 10, coming in at No. 19 overall.

    At the other end of the spectrum was West Virginia, which came in with the lowest overall happiness score in the country and the highest senior depression prevalence of 21.5 percent. The state of Louisiana, which ranked 47th overall, had the second-lowest happiness score in the U.S. and a senior depression prevalence of 18.8 percent.

    To come up with its study, Legacy Healing Center analyzed data provided by America’s Health Rankings, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Census Bureau, America’s Health Rankings, World Population Review, and SeniorCenters.com, and examined factors specific to the quality of life and well-being for seniors like senior suicide rates, how many elders live alone, life expectancy at 65, senior volunteer rates, overall state happiness, and more.

    The states of Hawaii and Alaska were excluded from the study.

    This is the full list of the top 10 U.S. states that are the happiest places for retirees, according to the Legacy Healing Center.

    1. New Jersey
    2. Connecticut
    3. South Dakota
    4. Maryland
    5. Nebraska
    6. Massachusetts
    7. Delaware
    8. New York
    9. California
    10. Utah

    Continue/Read Original Article: These Are the 10 Happiest States for Retirees in the U.S.

    UNC-Chapel Hill Launches Statewide Study on Libraries and Generative AI in Local Communities – UNC.edu

    UNC-Chapel Hill launches statewide study on libraries and generative AI in local communities

    By University Communications, Thursday, June 4th, 2026

    Warm February afternoon scene on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. February 16, 2022 (Jon Gardiner/UNC-Chapel Hill)

    The announcement was made Thursday at the New Bern-Craven County Public Library as part of Chancellor Lee H. Roberts’ tour of eastern North Carolina.   

    The project, “Local Libraries and Generative AI,” emphasizes listening, assessment and co-design as the foundation for equitable engagement with emerging technologies. The study is led by Diane Kelly, professor and interim dean in the School of Data and Information Sciences, in collaboration with María R. Estorino, vice provost for University Library and university librarian, and in partnership with Michelle Underhill, state librarian with the Library of North Carolina. 

    As generative AI tools continue to shape education, work and everyday information practices, many communities across North Carolina face challenges related to infrastructure, training and access. Public libraries and community college libraries often serve as trusted community anchors in these areas, yet there is limited research available to guide responsible, sustainable approaches to AI literacy in community settings. 

    “Generative AI is reshaping how people access and use information, and Carolina has both the opportunity and the responsibility to ensure that transformation reaches every corner of our state,” said UNC-Chapel Hill Chancellor Lee H. Roberts. “This partnership brings together Carolina’s research strength and the deep community knowledge of local librarians to develop practical, sustainable approaches to AI Literacy that serve the needs of North Carolinians.” 

    The project runs from summer 2026 through 2028 and is organized into five phases with two sequential cohorts of public libraries participating over the course of the study. Researchers will work closely with participating libraries to better understand local needs, institutional capacity and community perspectives surrounding AI technologies. The project prioritizes collaboration with libraries to ensure future AI literacy efforts are grounded in the realities and strengths of local institutions. 

    “People have always turned to libraries to make sense of new technologies, and today that technology is AI,” said María R. Estorino, vice provost for University Library and university librarian. “Participation in an AI-shaped world starts at the local level. By partnering with our public library colleagues, we can build a foundation for AI proficiency in our communities driven by trust and local realities. We’re eager to learn together with them and identify models that empower all North Carolinians to access and engage with AI in informed and responsible ways.” 

    According to project leaders, the study is designed not only to explore how libraries can respond to generative AI, but also to help ensure that local communities are included in conversations shaping the future of information access and digital literacy. 

    “Generative AI is changing how people seek, evaluate and use information, and communities are experiencing these technologies in very different ways,” said Diane Kelly, professor and interim dean in the School of Data and Information Sciences. “This project is about understanding those differences and working collaboratively with libraries to identify approaches that are realistic, sustainable and matched to local needs.” 

    The initiative contributes to broader efforts to advance equitable participation in an AI-shaped information environment by grounding future AI literacy work in evidence, trust and community partnership. Through iterative learning and collaboration across participating cohorts, the study aims to generate actionable insights while respecting the unique challenges and strengths of local North Carolina communities. 

    “The Library of North Carolina connects our state’s 437 library branches in all 100 counties to trustworthy and accessible information,” said N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Secretary Pamela B. Cashwell. “As we all navigate this complex and formidable technology, this project ensures that local libraries are not only part of the AI conversation, but a gateway to understanding it for the people of our state.”  Categories Latest News, News

    Editor’s Note: See Also, https://www.infodocket.com/2026/06/04/unc-chapel-hill-launches-statewide-study-on-libraries-and-generative-ai-in-local-communities/

    Continue/Read Original Article: https://uncnews.unc.edu/2026/06/04/unc-chapel-hill-launches-libraries-and-ai-support-in-local-communities/

    CBS News fires ‘60 Minutes’ correspondent Scott Pelley after clash with new producer – NBC News

    Media

    CBS News fires ‘60 Minutes’ correspondent Scott Pelley after clash with new producer

    “Incompetence and unprofessionalism in the new management have wreaked havoc,” Pelley said in a statement, referring in part to CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss.

    00:0005:23, ’60 Minutes’ correspondent Scott Pelley fired from CBS

    By Daniel Arkin

    June 2, 2026, 6:47 PM PDT / Updated June 3, 2026, 5:02 AM PDT

    CBS News fired veteran “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley on Tuesday, a day after he confronted the show’s new executive producer at a heated staff meeting.

    “Your antipathy to the future of the show has come through loud and clear. And I have heard you,” “60 Minutes” executive producer Nick Bilton said in a letter addressed to Pelley, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News.

    “I therefore write on behalf of CBS News, Inc. to inform you that your employment with CBS is terminated for cause effective immediately,” Bilton added.

    In a written statement, Pelley expressed “gratitude for the men and women of CBS News who encouraged and enriched my work, very often at the risk of their own lives. I pray for a day when those people and their ideals are honored again —a day when sanity, competence, and courage return.”

    Pelley’s exit deepens the turmoil at “60 Minutes,” the leading news magazine on American television. In recent months, “60 Minutes” employees have clashed with CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss over the show’s editorial direction under its new corporate owner, Paramount Skydance, the media company run by technology scion David Ellison.

    The tension reached a fever pitch Monday during a “60 Minutes” staff meeting designed to introduce employees to Bilton, a technology journalist tapped by Weiss to be executive producer of the program. Pelley laced into Bilton, according to an audio recording obtained by NBC News and a source who was in the room.

    Bilton, a documentary filmmaker and a former tech columnist at The New York Times, told the gathered staffers that Weiss “loves this institution,” according to the recording. Pelley interrupted Bilton and pushed back, accusing Weiss of “murdering” the venerable news magazine, which debuted in September 1968.

    “She does not love this place,” Pelley told Bilton, according to the recording. “She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that.”

    Bari Weiss in New York in 2024.
    Bari Weiss in New York in 2024.Noam Galai / Getty Images for The Free Press file

    Pelley also pressed Bilton about the firings of former executive producer Tanya Simon and fellow correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega; Bilton said those decisions predated him. Alfonsi collided with Weiss last year over the decision to postpone a “60 Minutes” segment about the Trump administration’s deportation of Venezuelan men to a prison in El Salvador.

    Alfonsi alleged the story was abruptly pulled for “political reasons.” Weiss said it was “not ready” for air. The segment, titled “Inside CECOT,” ultimately aired in January and featured statements from the White House and the Department of Homeland Security that were not in the original version.

    In one especially tense exchange at Monday’s meeting, Pelley asked Bilton why he had accepted a position at a show “knowing that you would never be welcomed here,” according to the recording.

    “I don’t believe that will be the case,” Bilton replied, according to the recording.

    “I have been a journalist for 25 years, Scott. I have sat and talked with incredibly powerful people like you have,” he added. “None of it intimidates me, OK?”

    In the termination letter obtained by NBC News, Bilton accused Pelley of “remarkable incivility and contempt.”

    “Yesterday’s performative display of hostility — enacted in front of the staff instead of in a civil, private conversation — demonstrated that you have no interest in contributing to the future success of the show, or approaching my new tenure with a mind open to collaboration and progress,” Bilton wrote.

    Pelley did not mention Weiss or Bilton by name in his lengthy written statement about his firing. But he said “new management” had instructed him to “inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story” and told him to report unverified assertions.

    “Incompetence and unprofessionalism in the new management have wreaked havoc. In a case involving one of my stories, the entire program came within 19 minutes of not getting on the air at all,” Pelley said in part. He did not provide specifics.

    CBS News spokespeople did not immediately respond late Tuesday to a request for comment on Pelley’s statement.

    Nick Bilton seated on stage
    Nick Bilton in 2018.Matt Winkelmeyer / Getty Images file

    Pelley’s firing marks the end of his nearly 40-year run at CBS News. He joined the news division in 1989 before he ascended to the anchor desk at the “CBS Evening News,” which he helmed from 2011 to 2017. He was a “60 Minutes” correspondent for more than 20 years.

    In an email to NBC News, former “60 Minutes” executive producer Jeff Fager said, “I wouldn’t want to be running the program without Scott. He is the best of the best.”

    Continue/Read Original Article: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/cbs-news-fires-60-minutes-correspondent-scott-pelley-rcna348176

    Firings at CBS’ ‘60 Minutes’ reflect fight for media control in Trump era – NPR

    Analysis

    Firings at CBS’ ’60 Minutes’ reflect the fight for media control in the age of Trump

    June 3, 20261:58 PM ET

    David Folkenflik 2018 square

    By David Folkenflik, 3-Minute Listen

    Correspondents of CBS' 60 Minutes pose for a portrait in 2023. From left to right, they are Sharyn Alfonsi, L. Jon Wertheim, Bill Whitaker, Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Cecilia Vega, and Anderson Cooper. Former Executive Producer Bill Owens sits on the far right. Only Wertheim, Whitaker and Stahl remain at the program.

    Correspondents of CBS’ 60 Minutes pose for a portrait in 2023. From left to right, they are Sharyn Alfonsi, L. Jon Wertheim, Bill Whitaker, Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Cecilia Vega, and Anderson Cooper. Former Executive Producer Bill Owens sits on the far right. Only Wertheim, Whitaker and Stahl remain at the program.

    CBS Photo Archive / CBS via Getty Images / CBS


    When CBS fired Scott Pelley on Tuesday night, the new 60 Minutes executive producer, Nick Bilton, told Pelley it was for insubordination at a staff meeting the day before.

    The veteran correspondent argues he was defending the DNA of 60 Minutes and the integrity of its journalism.

    The battle royale over the network’s most prestigious and profitable news program is part of a broader fight over the direction of CBS News.

    And given CBS’s acquisition by a billionaire family whose business interests have become intertwined with the political interests of President Trump, it reflects a larger war over control of the media in the current moment.

    It’s Been a Minute

    Meet the billionaires who control your media

    That father and son, Larry and David Ellison, bought CBS’ parent company, Paramount, last summer. In January, they became co-owners of TikTok’s U.S. operations. Now they’re seeking approval from Trump’s regulators to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN.

    A glamorous show shorn, for now, of most its stars

    CBS fired Cecilia Vega, a correspondent, and Tanya Simon, the executive producer, from 60 Minutes last week. They are shown in this photo at the 2026 White House Correspondents' Association Dinner on April 25, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

    CBS fired Cecilia Vega, a correspondent, and Tanya Simon, the executive producer, from 60 Minutes last week. They are shown in this photo at the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on April 25, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

    Kristina Bumphrey / Variety via Getty Images / Variety

    But the specifics of this individual episode matter — for 60 Minutes, CBS, its audience of millions, and even the news business itself.

    The program has been the most glamorous post in broadcast news. The correspondents are the stars of the show. And now, there are just three of them.

    Anderson Cooper left last month, concerned over the direction of the network’s coverage. Last week was a virtual bloodbath: correspondents Cecilia Vega and Sharyn Alfonsi were fired. So were a producer and two show executives — including Tanya Simon, a longtime staffer who had stepped up as executive producer when her predecessor resigned in protest before the Ellisons’ takeover.

    Business

    One by one, U.S. civil rights agency dismantles tools to fight discrimination

    With Pelley’s ouster, only correspondents Lesley Stahl, Bill Whitaker, and Jon Wertheim remain. Now they are considering whether to resign, according to two associates with knowledge.

    Their brand-new boss, Bilton, was previously a tech reporter for The New York Times and an investigative reporter for Vanity Fair. He executive-produced a documentary for Netflix about a couple accused of laundering Bitcoin and has been a producer on several other films.

    Neither does Bari Weiss, whom David Ellison installed as the network’s editor in chief last October. The Ellisons also bought her center-right views-and-news site, The Free Press.

    She has maintained that the network of Walter Cronkite needs a makeover for the digital moment. She has also contended for years that CBS, along with the rest of mainstream media, is too reflexively anti-Trump, anti-Israel, and too woke.

    A rejection of CBS News executives’ overtures

    The new executive producer of 60 Minutes, Nick Bilton, has been a tech journalist and documentary filmmaker, but lacks experience in broadcast news.

    Matt Winkelmeyer /Getty Images / Getty Images North America

    Bilton attempted to set a conciliatory tone at Monday’s meeting — his first with the show. Pelley, a formidable veteran correspondent and former CBS Evening News anchor, wasn’t having it.

    Pelley called Bilton unwelcome and unqualified. And Pelley said that Weiss was attempting to “murder” the program.

    In firing Pelley on Tuesday, Bilton said the journalist had hijacked the meeting and rejected overtures to work constructively through their differences. (NPR obtained a copy of the firing notice.) Bilton wrote that Pelley’s “antipathy to the future of the show came through loud and clear.”

    In his own statement late Tuesday evening, shared with NPR, Pelley accused CBS’s new news leadership of killing 60 Minutes‘ DNA and pushing him “to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story” and “to include assertions that are unverified.”

    The accusations, to which CBS has not yet responded, echo those made by Alfonsi and Vega, the two correspondents fired last week.

    Earlier this year, Alfonsi publicly complained after Weiss held one of her stories at the last minute, and kept it frozen for weeks, demanding an on-camera interview with a Trump White House official that never played out. It ran, unchanged from the intended version, with additional statements from the administration tacked on to the end.

    After being fired, Vega said in a statement obtained by NPR that her team had “experienced efforts to insert political bias into our stories.”

    “Let’s call this what it is: censorship, both censorship and self-driven” Vega continued. “It is dangerous for the show and dangerous for democracy.”

    Continue/Read Original Article: Firings at CBS’ ‘60 Minutes’ reflect fight for media control in Trump era : NPR

    2026 Library Systems Briefing – American Libraries Magazine

    2026 Library Systems Briefing

    Tech companies stay competitive with emerging platforms

    By Marshall Breeding | June 1, 2026

    Facebook Twitter Email Print

    Man peering through a spreadsheet window as if they were window blinds at the city outside
    Illustration: IKON Images/Adobe Stock

    The library technology industry is at a critical juncture, driven by uncertainties in funding and disruptions in technology, particularly around artificial intelligence (AI). Business transitions have included changes in executive leadership, acquisitions, and new ownership. Despite these shakeups, most vendors advanced along their development road maps, with some launching new or improved products.

    State of the industry

    Clarivate, which in recent years has subsumed the technology products of Ex Libris and Innovative, further strengthened its place as the industry leader. Clarivate has embraced AI across its businesses, including with the 2024 release of its Academic AI Platform, supporting a strategy to harness these technologies while delivering reliable content.

    The Ex Libris suite of products, including Primo and the library services platform (LSP) Alma, have become the primary platforms used by academic and national libraries over the last decade. New Alma selections include the National Library of Thailand, University of London, and Ghent University in Belgium. Many libraries opted to deepen their involvement with follow-on products, including 23 new contracts for Leganto for course list management and 116 new contracts for Rapido and RapidILL for resource sharing. This year, Ex Libris launched Alma Specto, an AI-powered platform for managing and promoting digital collections. It also created Library Open Workflows to allow non-programmers to enable integrations in the Ex Libris platform through a user-friendly interface.

    Innovative ’s products mostly serve public libraries. Innovative has focused considerable development energy on its patron-oriented product suite Vega, since it is interoperable with the company’s integrated library systems (ILSes) Sierra and Polaris. The company has made progress on each of the components, including Vega Discover, Vega Interact, Vega Promote, Vega Starter, and Vega WebBuilder. Polaris has expanded beyond its well-established North American presence into multiple international markets, including Australia and Singapore.

    When it comes to academic libraries, Ex Libris has significant competition from EBSCO Information Services. More than 300 libraries worldwide use EBSCO FOLIO, a comprehensive resource management and discovery package. Recent libraries selecting EBSCO FOLIO include University of Notre Dame in Indiana and University of Kansas, while the Library of Congress and Columbia University Libraries in New York City completed implementations of FOLIO to replace many legacy systems last year. EBSCO has amplified its suite of products in the last year, launching AI-enhanced search and natural language search for EBSCO Discovery Service and its full-text databases, as well as a new linked data framework for its products, the EBSCO Scholarly Graph.

    EBSCO saw a major leadership change with the departure of Annie Callanan in 2025; Allen Powell has been named interim CEO.

    Open source library management systems and discovery tools have expanded their presence. ByWater Solutions, the largest company supporting the Koha ILS and discovery interface Aspen Discovery, attracted 55 new support contracts for Koha and 30 for Aspen. Grove for Libraries, established in 2024, focuses on Aspen Discovery and the LiDA mobile app. Equinox Open Library Initiative supports Evergreen, Koha, Aspen Discovery, and other open source products. Index Data, the company that developed the internal infrastructure for FOLIO, provides support, development, and hosting services for FOLIO, the ReShare resource sharing environment, and other open source software and open data projects.

    OCLC saw 39 new contracts for WorldShare Management Services LSP and WorldCat Discovery Service. OCLC has also employed AI to enhance the quality of WorldCat records and to add new features to its tools for resource sharing services, analytics, and collection development.

    A default judgment brought an end to OCLC’s litigation against the shadow library search engine Anna’s Archive for unauthorized harvesting of WorldCat data. OCLC has also pursued litigation against Baker & Taylor for its BTCat cataloging utility; that lawsuit largely ended with Baker & Taylor’s bankruptcy, although the Bridgeall Libraries component of the suit remains active.

    Constellation Software (CSI) maintained its status as one of the largest library technology industry investors, with ownership of companies including Baratz, BiblioCommons, EnvisionWare, Softlink, and Sophia. CSI’s most recent acquisition, SirsiDynix, last year launched BLUEcloud Accelerate, an initiative to advance the completion of its BLUEcloud suite. Following the acquisition, longtime SirsiDynix CEO Bill Davison left that role and was replaced by former CFO Mike Nehren.

    BiblioCommons made significant enhancements to its BiblioCore discovery interface, including AI-powered search and review summaries.

    Soutron Global, backed by Bloom Equity Partners, acquired Vancouver-based MINISIS in late 2024 and picked up Auto-Graphics, which offers the VERSO ILS and SHAREit interlibrary loan platform, in March 2025. Brad Frasher was named CEO of Soutron in October 2025, replacing founder Tony Saadat.

    Civica, well established in Australia, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand, recently renewed efforts to market its Spydus library management system in North America.

    The Library Corporation continues to be owned and managed by its founder, Annette H. Murphy, after more than 50 years. Its Library.Solution ILS saw seven new selections in major school districts as well as in mid-sized public libraries.

    Of companies serving niche sectors, Biblionix targets small public libraries with its Apollo ILS while Keystone Systems specializes in libraries for the blind and print disabled. Book Systems had an exceptional year of sales of the Atriuum ILS to smaller public libraries and school districts.

    In other business sectors, the use of AI has driven workforce reduction; we can expect similar dynamics in the library industry.

    Systematic deployed a new version of Cicero in major European libraries, including the Helmet online library in Finland, Stockholm Public Library in Sweden, and Hamburg Public Library in Germany. Axiell won new contracts in Europe for its public library LSP, Quria, including Neuilly-sur-Seine Media Library in France.

    Funding reductions for libraries and other economic headwinds have led to industry belt-tightening, with EBSCO, OCLC, and SirsiDynix reducing their overall workforce. Ex Libris, Innovative, and most of the mid-sized companies held steady or expanded slightly.

    Library technology forecast

    Despite current economic challenges, vendors providing technology products and services can expect good opportunities ahead. Many libraries that have been deferring system replacements may move to replace their outdated products with modern services. Vendors with international reach will naturally benefit the most. Expect at least modest growth in product sales for the next year or two.

    In times of ever more constrained economic resources, companies will reap rewards from the development of broad product suites targeting current expectations. The trend of libraries acquiring bundled products addressing diverse service areas will strengthen as fewer libraries follow a mix-and-match strategy.

    For libraries, concerns regarding proprietary products remain, driving incremental growth in the adoption of open source solutions, though with high expectations for comprehensive commercial support services. Many libraries remain skeptical about AI, especially related to patron-facing services.

    Regardless, vendors will continue to explore new AI features, both in patron-facing interfaces and for staff workflows. They will increasingly employ AI to accelerate software development and deliver support services—even if they don’t disclose it publicly. In other business sectors, these uses of AI have driven workforce reduction; we can expect similar dynamics in the library industry. AI will continue to present both challenges and opportunities for years to come.

    About the report

    This briefing excerpts the 2026 Library Systems Report, which documents ongoing investments of libraries in strategic technology products in 2025. It covers for-profit and nonprofit organizations that offer resource management products—especially integrated library systems and library services platforms—and comprehensive discovery products.

    The vendors included have responded to a survey requesting details about their organization, sales performance, and narrative explanations of accomplishments. Additional sources consulted include press releases, news articles, and other publicly available information. Most organizations provided lists of libraries represented in the statistics reported, enabling more detailed analysis and validation.

    The full report, as well as additional personnel information, sales statistics, and vendor-provided narratives, is available at Library Technology Guides.

    This story was originally published on American Libraries Online on May 5, 2026.

    MARSHALL BREEDING is an independent consultant, speaker, and author. He writes and edits the website Library Technology Guides.

    Continue/Read Original Article: 2026 Library Systems Briefing | American Libraries Magazine

    60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley fired by CBS News after clash – CBS – The Guardian

    Support the Guardian

    CBS

    60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley fired by CBS News after clash

    Move comes after meeting in which Pelley said network chief Bari Weiss was ‘murdering’ news show

      By Jeremy Barr, Tue 2 Jun 2026 21.45 EDT

      Scott Pelley, one of the most well-known and respected journalists in broadcast journalism, has been fired by CBS News after clashing with network brass over last week’s severe round of cuts at 60 Minutes, the show he has worked on since 2004, the Guardian confirmed.

      While changes were long expected at 60 Minutes, CBS News management shocked staffers last week by firing the network’s executive producer, executive editor and two correspondents, Cecilia Vega and Sharyn Alfonsi, without giving a specific reason for their terminations.

      During an extremely heated meeting on Monday morning with the show’s newly appointed executive editor Nick Bilton, along with another CBS News executive, Pelley rebuked Bari Weiss, the longtime opinion commentator who joined the network in October as editor-in-chief.

      “She’s murdering 60 Minutes,” Pelley said, as first reported by the Guardian. “She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it and is doing exactly that.”

      A source close to the network said that executives had attempted to meet with Pelley after the terminations on Thursday, to no avail.

      Ultimately, Pelley met with Weiss and fellow executives on Tuesday, and she conveyed that his behavior was inappropriate. Pelley then told members of the show’s staff that he expected to be terminated, sources said.

      Screenshot of a letter
      The termination letter from Nick Bilton to Scott Pelley. Photograph: Provided to the Guardian

      Pelley received a message from Bilton on Tuesday evening informing him that he had been “terminated for cause effective immediately”. In the message, which was first reported by Puck’s Dylan Byers, Bilton called out Pelley’s conduct in the meeting. “Yesterday, you hijacked my first meeting with staff to disparage me, my qualifications, and my intentions with remarkable incivility and contempt,” he wrote.

      Bilton also sent an email to the staff of 60 Minutes informing them of Pelley’s termination. “You should hear this from me first. We have parted ways with Scott Pelley,” he wrote in the message, which was obtained by the Guardian. “I know how much Scott meant to many of you, and I don’t say this lightly. I made repeated attempts to have direct conversations with him over the weekend, and this afternoon I tried to find common ground. That was not the path Scott chose.”

      With journalist Anderson Cooper announcing earlier this year that he would be leaving the show, Pelley’s departure leaves 60 Minutes with only three full-time correspondents months ahead of the launch of its 59th season this fall: Lesley Stahl, Bill Whitaker and L Jon Wertheim. (The CBS News journalist and former evening news anchor Norah O’Donnell contributes to the show.)

      The show is expected to more readily utilize correspondents from across the network, though no new contributors were named as part of the announcement on Thursday.

      “What I regret most is that this situation interfered with the conversation I had hoped to have with you about Season 59 and the future of this show,” Bilton wrote in his message to the show’s staff. “I realize this is a great deal of change in a very short time, and I wouldn’t pretend otherwise … What I will commit to is this: My unyielding support for each of you, the journalism that you do and what we will do together going forward.”

      Last Wednesday, while presenting at the News & Documentary Emmy awards, Pelley publicly praised Alfonsi – hours after she announced that the network was not renewing her contract for reasons she said were punitive. “There have been many great 60 Minutes correspondents over the years. I see Sharyn Alfonsi in the audience,” he said.

      Pelley also had extremely kind words for Santiago Campos, an 18-year-old high school senior who said – after accepting a scholarship funded by CBS News – that the network’s current leadership “stains the legacy of Mike Wallace”, the former 60 Minutes correspondent.

      Continue/Read Original Article: 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley fired by CBS News after clash | CBS | The Guardian

      Midterm Elections 2026: Updates, News and Projections Monthly Series – February 18 through March 31, 2026

      Editor’s Note: Prepared for DrWeb’s Domain by Perplexity AI. This is the missing monthly report for February 18 – March 31, 2026. Time window: February 18, 2026 through March 31, 2026. –DrWeb

      Midterm Elections 2026: Updates, News and Projections Monthly Series – February 18 through March 31, 2026

      Politics

      President Donald Trump’s job approval is underwater in multiple recent measures, with Silver Bulletin showing net approval around -17.3 by late March 2026. Other polling put him in the high-30s on raw approval (36-39%), with disapproval in the high-50s (53-59%).

      The campaign news cycle increasingly tied that weakness to the Iran conflict and economic pain, especially higher gas prices and inflation. The November 2026 midterms were still months away, but the political environment looked more like a referendum on Trump than a normal governing period.

      On Congress, the House generic ballot favored Democrats (47.1% to 42.5%), and Senate battleground states showed Trump underwater in key races. That combination is historically dangerous for the president’s party in a midterm year.

      Economy

      Economic anxiety was the core issue for voters. Gas prices rose above $4 a gallon for the first time since 2022, and inflation accelerated sharply in March, with the 12-month CPI rate jumping to 3.3% from 2.4% in February.

      The war with Iran disrupted oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, pushing crude higher and feeding into higher prices for consumers. Forecasts were already warning of stagflation risk: slower growth plus elevated inflation.

      Mortgage rates climbed above 6%, regional stock markets fell, and economists saw a meaningful recession risk over the next 12 months. Affordability, not abstract growth, dominated the political conversation.

      Social issues

      Social issues remained tightly tied to turnout and identity. Immigration, civil rights, abortion, education, and culture-war disputes were all part of the broader conflict, even when they were not the lead headline.

      These issues mattered because they reinforced base motivation on both sides. In a low-trust, high-polarization environment, enthusiasm and anger can matter as much as persuasion in low-turnout midterms.

      Key events

      The defining event was Operation Epic Fury, the U.S.–Israel military campaign against Iran that began February 28, 2026, targeting Iranian leadership, military infrastructure, and nuclear sites. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in the opening strikes.

      By March 31, Trump said the U.S. military campaign in Iran would wind down in two to three weeks and pledged a national address on Iran. He claimed the main objective—preventing a nuclear-armed Iran—had been achieved and predicted gas prices would fall once U.S. involvement ended. None of that has occurred.

      Chart 1 — Trump Net approval (latest)

      Trump Net Approval Rating, February 18 – March 31, 2026

      Chart 2 — Generic congressional ballot

      Generic Congressional Ballot, February 18 – March 31, 2026. Democrats lead 47.1% to 42.5%

      Scott Pelley Accuses CBS News Boss of ‘Murdering’ ‘60 Minutes’ – The New York Times

      In an explosive staff meeting, Mr. Pelley, a correspondent for the long-running Sunday news show, blasted Bari Weiss, the CBS editor in chief, and Nick Bilton, the show’s new executive producer.

      Listen · 5:42 min

      Bari Weiss, the editor in chief of CBS News, and the show’s longtime correspondent Scott Pelley.
      Michael M. Grynbaum
      Benjamin Mullin

      By Michael M. Grynbaum and Benjamin Mullin

      June 1, 2026, Updated 2:42 p.m. ET

      In an extraordinary exchange, Mr. Pelley, his newscaster’s baritone sometimes shaking in anger, told Nick Bilton, the new executive producer, that he had “slender” qualifications for his new job and questioned the network’s commitment to the future of the program, according to a recording of the meeting obtained by The New York Times.

      The 10 a.m. gathering, held at the program’s Midtown Manhattan headquarters, was intended as a formal introduction to Mr. Bilton, a tech journalist and filmmaker who was appointed last week as part of a major shake-up at “60 Minutes.” CBS fired Tanya Simon, the previous executive producer, and her deputy, along with Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega, two of the show’s correspondents — an event that Mr. Pelley referred to as “Black Thursday.”

      The meeting quickly turned tense — not a surprise after months of strain between veteran journalists at “60 Minutes” and Ms. Weiss, an opinion journalist who was a longtime critic of legacy media institutions before she became the head of one last year. She was appointed by David Ellison, a tech scion who took control of CBS’s parent company, Paramount, in a multibillion-dollar merger.

      Mr. Bilton, who had never worked in traditional broadcast news, opened Monday’s meeting by trying to assuage the anxieties of staff members who believed he might fundamentally change the decades-old DNA of the country’s top-rated news program.

      “For me, the journalism is the journalism,” Mr. Bilton said, according to the recording. “That is why I am here. That is why we are all here.” He added: “The rumors people are spreading, that I’m going to turn the show into 60 one-minute episodes, that it’s going to be like TikTok, that is not changing. The show is going to stay exactly like it is for now.”

      Nick Bilton, a tech journalist and filmmaker, was appointed executive producer of “60 Minutes” last week.Credit…Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images

      He also warned that the broadcast television industry that incubated “60 Minutes” would soon be obsolete. “Broadcast is an ice cube that is melting, OK?” Mr. Bilton said, saying the show had to adapt. “Bari loves this institution,” he added. “She loves ‘60 Minutes.’”

      At that, Mr. Pelley interrupted.

      Mr. Pelley added: “She has no qualifications for her job; you have slender qualifications for this job. The changes that she’s made at the ‘Evening News’ have been catastrophic, so why should we expect that any of this is going to be any better?”

      Mr. Bilton responded: “Well, I will show you. That’s what I have to say. That is my plan over the next two weeks. I’ll be meeting with everyone. I’m very excited to meet with everyone, yourself included.”

      A representative for CBS News did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday.

      Ms. Weiss did not attend the gathering. A CBS executive at the meeting said that Ms. Weiss had been “prepared to come, and we asked her not to,” citing the staff’s ill feelings surrounding the firings.

      Mr. Pelley pressed Mr. Bilton repeatedly on why CBS had fired Ms. Alfonsi and Ms. Vega. Mr. Bilton said those decisions predated his hiring. Mr. Pelley asked Mr. Bilton why he had accepted a position at a program “knowing that you will never be welcome here.”

      “I have no problem taking a job in a place that I am not welcome in,” Mr. Bilton said. “I don’t think that will be the case.” He added: “You are not going to intimidate me in front of this group of people. I want that to be clear.”

      Read more: Scott Pelley Accuses CBS News Boss of ‘Murdering’ ‘60 Minutes’ – The New York Times

      Continue/Read Original Article: Scott Pelley Accuses CBS News Boss of ‘Murdering’ ‘60 Minutes’ – The New York Times

      US, UK and Australia agree pact to protect undersea cables, ‘the arteries of modern civilisation’ – CNN

      World, 4 min read

      By Tim Lister, May 31, 2026

      Offshore electric cabling for the Walney Offshore windfarm project being loaded onto a cable laying vessel in the docks in Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.

      Offshore electric cabling for the Walney Offshore windfarm project being loaded onto a cable laying vessel in the docks in Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.Global Warming Images/Shutterstock

      The United States, Australia and the United Kingdom have taken a big step towards tackling growing threats to undersea pipelines and cables, which carry huge amounts of energy and data around the world.

      The three governments are planning to develop new unmanned undersea vehicles ⁠as part of their trilateral AUKUS defense ⁠pact.

      The agreement was announced at a meeting of the three countries’ defense ministers in Singapore, with deliveries due next year.

      Western governments see a growing risk of Russian and Chinese sabotage of undersea cables and are also concerned that Iran may seek to exploit the many data networks running through the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf.

      The “seabed is a battlefield” said Australia’s Defence Minister, Richard Marles, in Singapore, calling for tougher action against so-called shadow-fleet vessels.

      US President Donald Trump has been severely critical of European allies for spending too little on defense and not helping restore freedom of navigation in the Gulf. But the US has continued to work with governments in Europe and Asia on new defense technologies, especially drones.

      The programme will improve the three nations’ reconnaissance and strike capabilities, “and bolster ⁠superiority in anti-submarine and anti-surface warfare,” as well as mine countermeasures, AUKUS said.

      US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the vehicles would be highly adaptable and “support undersea operations and maintain our collective advantage in the maritime domain.”

      The new AUKUS project will sharpen all three countries’ ability to respond to threats, including those targeting underwater cables and pipelines, through a range of “cutting edge sensors and weapons systems for undersea drones,” UK Defence Secretary John Healey said.

      Marles said undersea internet cables – “the arteries of modern civilization” – were being cut at an unprecedented rate, with island nations like Australia acutely vulnerable.

      “Over the past 18 months, we have witnessed a series of attacks against subsea critical infrastructure at a scale and frequency that is historically unprecedented,” he said.

      Australia's Defense Minister Richard Marles speaks to the press in Singapore.

      Australia’s Defense Minister Richard Marles speaks to the press in Singapore.Jam Sta Rosa/AFP/Getty Images

      The UK government has also highlighted the vulnerability of the world’s digital highways.

      “Every international payment, every cross-border trade executed in milliseconds, every flow of data between businesses here in the UK and markets overseas – all travel along the seabed,” Telecoms Minister Liz Lloyd said Friday.

      A vulnerable network

      Around 570 cables (plus a further 80 planned) carry between 95% and 99% of the world’s intercontinental telecommunications data. Fiber cables can carry terabits per second; satellites handle far less.

      Continue/Read Original Article: US, UK and Australia agree pact to protect undersea cables, ‘the arteries of modern civilisation’ | CNN

      Ranked: U.S. Population Growth by State (1970–2025) – Visual Capitalist

      Maps

      Published 2 days ago, on May 30, 2026, By Bruno Venditti

      Design, by Amy Kuo

      See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

      Explore U.S. population growth by state from 1970–2025, highlighting the rise of the Sun Belt and migration trends.

      Use This Visualization

      Ranked: U.S. Population Growth by State (1970–2025)

      See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

      Key Takeaways

      • Nevada’s population surged 572% since 1970, making it America’s fastest-growing state by a wide margin.
      • Population growth was concentrated across the Sun Belt and Mountain West, led by Arizona, Florida, Texas, and Utah.
      • Most Northeastern and Midwestern states grew far more slowly, while Washington, D.C. was the only region to lose population overall.

      America’s population shifted dramatically toward the South and West between 1970 and 2025, reshaping the country’s economic and political landscape.

      States across the Sun Belt and Mountain West saw explosive growth as Americans moved toward lower-cost housing, warmer climates, and expanding job markets. Meanwhile, many Northeastern and Midwestern states posted comparatively modest gains.

      The data for this visualization comes from the U.S. Census Bureau.

      Nevada’s Las Vegas Boom

      Nevada recorded the fastest population growth in the country, expanding by 572% since 1970. The state’s transformation was largely fueled by Las Vegas evolving from a tourism-centered economy into a broader metropolitan hub with expanding healthcare, logistics, construction, and business sectors.

      Arizona ranked second, growing by 329%, while Florida nearly tripled its population over the same period.Search:

      RankStateGrowth1970 population2025 population
      1Nevada572%488,7383,282,188
      2Arizona329%1,775,3997,623,818
      3Florida246%6,791,41823,462,518
      4Utah234%1,059,2733,538,904
      5Idaho185%713,0152,029,733
      6Texas183%11,198,65531,709,821
      7Colorado172%2,209,5966,012,561
      8Georgia146%4,587,93011,302,748
      9Alaska144%302,583737,270
      10Washington134%3,413,2448,001,020
      11North Carolina120%5,084,41111,197,968
      12South Carolina115%2,590,7135,570,274
      13New Mexico109%1,017,0552,125,498
      14Oregon104%2,091,5334,273,586
      15California97%19,971,06939,355,309

      Much of this growth came from Americans relocating away from higher-cost states in search of cheaper housing, lower taxes, warmer weather, and expanding job markets across the South and West.

      The Rise of the Sun Belt

      The biggest winners over the last 55 years were concentrated across the Sun Belt and Mountain West. Texas, Utah, Colorado, Georgia, and the Carolinas all more than doubled their populations as jobs and affordable housing drew in new residents.

      Texas added more than 20 million residents between 1970 and 2025, more than the current population of New York state.

      The state’s diversified economy, including energy, technology, manufacturing, and finance, helped fuel sustained growth across major cities like Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio.

      Florida’s growth story was similarly dramatic. Beyond retirees, the state attracted workers and businesses seeking lower taxes and lower living costs compared to coastal Northeastern states.

      Slow Growth in the Northeast and Midwest

      Many Northeastern and Midwestern states experienced far slower growth. New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and Michigan all grew by less than 15% over the entire period.

      Many of these states struggled to keep residents as manufacturing jobs declined and population growth increasingly shifted toward faster-growing Southern metros. While major cities like New York and Chicago remained economic centers, surrounding regions often struggled to retain population growth.

      The District of Columbia was the only area to post an overall population decline, shrinking by 8% since 1970. Much of this reflected suburbanization, as households moved into nearby Maryland and Virginia suburbs supported by highway expansion and new residential communities.

      Read more: Ranked: U.S. Population Growth by State (1970–2025) – Visual Capitalist

      Continue/Read Original Article: Ranked: U.S. Population Growth by State (1970–2025)

      Firings at ’60 Minutes,’ layoffs at NPR, the end of CBS Radio and Colbert: Thoughts at end of tough week for media – Substack

      0

      As Bari Weiss dismantles TV’s most successful news magazine, it’s worth asking what any of these moves achieve beyond furthering President Trump’s goal of silencing media outlets which he dislikes.

      Switching Codes w/Eric Deggans, May 31, 2026

      Imagine you have an amazing, classic car, which runs well and seems to improve its performance, year after year. It is the most-admired car among your friends and acquaintances. And everytime you hop inside, it delivers better than the performance you expect, winning awards and new fans every year you own it.

      This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

      Now imagine hiring someone with zero experience as a mechanic to completely overhaul the car because you’re worried, at some unknowable point in the future, the car may not perform as well as it is doing now.

      That’s the closest comparison I can think of to what just happened at CBS News and 60 Minutes, where editor-in-chief Bari Weiss just fired as the show’s Executive Producer, Tanya Simon – a woman who worked on the program for more than 25 years, was its first female executive producer and is a daughter of former correspondent Bob Simon. This firing came, despite the fact that the show has top ratings, a digital audience which is robust and growing and is winning major awards.

      As Simon’s replacement, Weiss hired Nick Bilton, an author, editor and writer who has never worked in broadcast TV news. To helm TV journalism’s most storied, admired and widely watched news magazine.

      Feels a lot like electing someone president who has never been an elected official before. What could go wrong?

      This news topped a tough week for journalism. NPR saw nearly 30 people leave, with 10 laid off, including close friends of mine. Ace journalists with loads of institutional knowledge like Neda Ulaby, Don Gonyea, Nell Greenfieldboyce and many others went out the door, despite record fundraising and donations.

      It was something I feared would happen, once President Trump made plain his plans to defund public media. But it also part of a larger dynamic – a drive by this current administration to restrict, punish or eliminate independent journalism which dares to report stories the President does not like.

      Defunding of public media, including PBS and NPR. The crippling of Voice of America. Layoffs of nearly half the newsroom at the Washington Post. The death of CBS Radio and Stephen Colbert’s The Late Show. These instances all seem connected to efforts by Trump and his allies to curb journalism and voices in media who dare to cross the current administration.

      Continue/Read Original Article: Firings at ’60 Minutes,’ layoffs at NPR, the end of CBS Radio and Colbert: Thoughts at end of tough week for media

      Soldiers carried these pocket-sized books into World War II – NPR

      FA

      Review

      Book Reviews

      In the ‘biggest book giveaway in history’ WWII soldiers received pocket-sized reads

      May 25, 20265:00 AM ET, Heard on Fresh Air

      Headshot of Maureen Corrigan

      By Maureen Corrigan, 7-Minute Listen, Transcript

       A Librarian's War: The Man Who Fought World War II with Books and Brought the Joy of Reading to Millions by Molly Guptill Manning

      Oxford University Press

      My best friend’s dad, who’d been in the Air Force in China, taught us to how say “hot water” in Mandarin. Another dad, an Army vet, let slip that he’d burned his uniform upon returning home, which puzzled us. And my own dad, a Navy vet, once said something about the “funny paperbacks” around during the war.

      It wasn’t until I began researching my book on The Great Gatsby that I realized my father had been one of the millions of servicemen on the receiving end of what’s been called the “biggest book giveaway in history.”

      When the U.S. entered World War II, there was an effort to get books into the hands of servicemen to combat boredom. The books, though, had to be light and small enough to fit in servicemen’s pockets. That was only one of the challenges faced by a group of publishers, librarians and booksellers who composed the Council on Books in Wartime.

      Author Interviews

      WWII By The Books: The Pocket-Size Editions That Kept Soldiers Reading

      The distribution program the Council eventually adopted stood in contrast to the Nazi book burnings that began in 1933. The motto of the Council on Books in Wartime was: “Books Are Weapons in the War of Ideas.” America would initiate a program for servicemen that would implicitly affirm the freedom to read widely.

      Col. Ray Trautman is the hero of this story. In a terrific forthcoming book called A Librarian’s War, coming out in September, Molly Guptill Manning details how Trautman came up with the idea of not just distributing books for the troops, but producing them. The Armed Services Editions, or ASEs as they were called, were those “funny paperbacks” that my father had mentioned to me.

      Printed on pulp paper, the Armed Services Editions began rolling off presses in 1943; by the time the program came to an end in 1947, nearly 123 million books were distributed to U.S. troops. The greatest distribution was on the eve of D-Day. Soldiers going over in landing crafts carried ASEs in their pockets. The most popular of the D-Day titles was Betty Smith’s A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.

      Just as inspiring, to my mind, was the fact that the Council’s selection committee didn’t limit its choices to just those books they assumed the troops would like. Sure, there were plenty of cowboy stories, Tarzan tales and suspense fiction. Forever Amber, a steamy historical romance by Kathleen Winsor, was especially popular. But among the 1,322 titles produced during the lifetime of the ASEs were Moby Dick, biographies of Frederick Douglass and Queen Victoria, essays by Lincoln and Emerson, and poetry collections by Longfellow, Keats and Edna St. Vincent Millay.

      Continue/Read Original Article: Soldiers carried these pocket-sized books into World War II : NPR

      The Heritage of Havoc: Mapping the Post-Trump Reconstruction of 2029 – DrWeb’s Domain Editorial 2026

      The Heritage of Havoc: Mapping the Post-Trump Reconstruction of 2029

      By DrWeb | Published on DrWeb’s Domain | May 20, 2026


      Section 1: The Inherited Repair Job — Deconstructing the Illiberal Playbook

      “The next president won’t get a real first term. They’ll inherit a repair job.”

      — From article

      This assessment captures the structural reality facing the American republic. When an executive office operates on the explicit premise of dismantling institutional norms, the subsequent administration cannot simply pivot to a novel legislative agenda. Instead, the immediate future requires an unprecedented structural excavation—a systematic undoing of systemic damage designed to outlast its creators.

      To understand the depth of the 2029 Reconstruction Project, one must analyze the mechanisms used to bypass traditional political rules, laws, and friction since January 2025. This was not a standard conservative governance cycle defined by tax adjustments or judicial appointments; it was an intentional structural realignment. By weaponizing the concept of the “unitary executive,” the administration systematically targeted the non-partisan foundations of civil service, regulatory oversight, and constitutional checks and balances.

      The goal was simple: to ensure that the state apparatus served personal loyalty over statutory obligation.

      The tragedy of “anticipatory obedience” —a phenomenon where institutional leaders, corporate executives, and press outlets preemptively modify their behavior to appease authoritarian rhetoric— accelerated this shift. When the guardrails of democracy fail, they rarely do so with a sudden crash. They erode quietly through a succession of unresisted decrees, reassignment of career specialists, and the calculated ignoring of congressional intent. The next occupant of the Oval Office will not find a functional vehicle awaiting a change of driver; they will find a stripped chassis, stripped of its internal mechanics and packed with institutional sabotage designed to detonate upon departure.


      Section 2: Archive of the Abnormal — Chronology of Systematic Erosion (Post-January 2025)

      The Evil Done by Trump, Image by Perplexity. Public Domain.

      The following record logs the policy initiatives, institutional purges, and norm violations enacted or attempted since the second inauguration in January 2025. This archive documents the “Trump Wrong” matrix that the 48th President must systematically dismantle to restore constitutional equilibrium.

      1. The Purge of the Mandarins: Reinstatement and Execution of Schedule F

      Within the opening days of the term, the reclassification of tens of thousands of career civil servants under Schedule F stripped professional policy experts, scientists, and lawyers of civil service protections. This transformed a merit-based bureaucracy into an apparatus of political fealty, replacing institutional memory with ideologically vetted loyalists.

      2. Weaponization of the Justice Department and Preemptive Pardons

      The independence of the Department of Justice was explicitly discarded. Executive directives sought to convert federal law enforcement into an investigative arm targeted at political adversaries, media critics, and whistleblowers, while simultaneously issuing sweeping, preemptive pardons for close associates, neutralizing the rule of law.

      3. Institutional Subversion of Defense and Intelligence Communities

      The systematically orchestrated replacement of apolitical military leadership and intelligence directors with hyper-partisan actors challenged the long-held norm of civilian-military separation. Intelligence reporting was filtered to conform to executive preferences rather than objective geopolitical realities, compromising national security infrastructure. Rename back to Department of Defense first day.

      4. Dismantling of the Regulatory State and Environmental Rollbacks

      Following a Supreme Court template that weakened agency deference, the administration systematically dissolved decades of environmental protections, workplace safety standards, and consumer protections. Executive orders rendered bodies like the EPA and FTC toothless, leaving corporate extraction unchecked. Restore pre-existing EPA and FTC and other agencies impacted by the anti-democratic EOs.

      5. Foreign Policy by Fiat: Abandonment of Multilateral Alliances

      American foreign policy devolved into transactional isolationism. Threats to exit NATO, the unilateral imposition of volatile global tariffs, and the explicit cozying up to autocratic regimes shattered international trust. Allies were alienated, creating power vacuums filled by authoritarian adversaries. Rebuild trust around the world, resume NATO full partnership, renew United Nations status and relationships and payments.

      6. The War on Truth: State-Sponsored Disinformation and Press Intimidation

      The machinery of the White House press office was transformed into a pure disinformation engine. Formal press credentials were systematically stripped from adversarial news organizations, and public health, economic, and meteorological data were routinely manipulated or suppressed to match executive narratives. Review and remove with marker note that these documents are no longer available as they are false statements by government officials or press offices or Web sites.

      7. Immigration Enforcement as State Spectacle

      The execution of mass deportation strategies relied on the deployment of domestic military assets and the construction of vast detention camps. These actions bypassed municipal authorities, violated basic civil liberties, and created a humanitarian and logistical crisis on American soil. End ICE, reform immigration for modern society, remove all detention camps, restore citizens to prior status (falsely deported), punish ICE officers for murders of American Citizens in Minnesota.

      8. The Subversion of Fiscal Oversight and Impoundment of Funds

      The administration revived the unconstitutional practice of impoundment —refusing to spend funds explicitly appropriated by Congress for social programs, scientific research, and municipal aid— effectively attempting to seize the power of the purse from the legislative branch. Remove any and all actions for impoundment. Return to normal fiscal oversight and appropriated Congressional funds are fully released, as the law requires.


      Section 3: The Reconstruction Mandate — Rebuilding the Ruins

      Reconstruction of American Democracy, 2029 Project Image by Perplexity. Public Domain.

      When the current cycle ends, the 48th President will face an existential checklist. This is the “repair job” referenced in the visual thesis: a presidency that must prioritize structural remediation over conventional policy. This work cannot be performed with timid centrist incrementalism. It requires a methodical, aggressive deployment of executive authority to restore the default settings of constitutional governance.

      The first priority must be the immediate revocation of Schedule F and the rehabilitation of the federal civil service. The specialized knowledge base of the state—the epidemiologists, constitutional attorneys, economic analysts, and environmental engineers—must be shielded by ironclad protections. Rebuilding the East Wing means more than fresh paint; it means reinstating transparency protocols, opening the visitor logs to public scrutiny, and ending the nepotistic practice of elevating family members and financial donors to sensitive national security roles.

      Concurrently, American diplomacy must enter an intensive phase of triage. Reconnecting with traditional allies requires more than rhetorical reassurance; it demands the codification of treaty commitments, the reinvigoration of joint intelligence sharing, and a clear, unambiguous return to multilateralism. The international credibility of the United States cannot be restored overnight, but it can be initiated by demonstrating that American commitments are bound by the enduring interests of the state, rather than the volatile whims of a single individual.


      Section 4: Multimedia Evidence and Digital Ephemera

      To contextualize the scale of this institutional transformation, independent scholars and journalists must consult the archival record of this era’s policy shifts and public resistance. In addition, any planned or prepared Reconstruction Team (yes, this is the Reconstruction Era 2029 version), can consider these good starting points to move forward:

      For a reconstruction team looking to systematically reverse executive overreach and rebuild democratic guardrails, several major think tanks, legal coalitions, and policy institutes are publishing concrete blueprints, tracking litigation, and mapping out structural fixes.

      These four highly credible, real-world resources offer actionable frameworks for restoring independent institutions:

      1. Rebuilding Federal Personnel Policy & Civil Service Capacity

      • The Blueprint: Building a More Effective, Responsive Government (The Roosevelt Institute)
      • What it offers: Drafted by former senior officials, this comprehensive report draws on insights from dozens of public servants to outline exactly how to recruit, retain, and protect modern federal teams. It provides over 160 practical ideas for administrative reform, moving beyond a simple return to the status quo toward building unyielding, resilient agency infrastructure.

      2. Legal Protections Against Schedule F and Patronage Systems

      • The Blueprint: Legal Vulnerabilities of Schedule F (Governing for Impact)
      • What it offers: A strict, highly detailed legal issue brief analyzing the statutory and constitutional arguments against the civil service reclassification known as Schedule F. It details how the Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) and core due process principles can be leveraged by reformers to defeat patronage systems and protect career experts from arbitrary, politically motivated firings.

      3. The Unified Strategic Frontline Against Executive Overreach

      • The Blueprint: Democracy 2025 Legal Resource Center (Democracy Forward)
      • What it offers: This is the central strategic hub coordinating a massive coalition of over 280 organizations. It tracks hundreds of legal challenges to unlawful executive orders, provides real-time briefings, and forms the literal litigation playbook for defending public interest protections, labor rights, and independent institutional authority.

      4. Restoring the Rule of Law and the Power of the Purse

      • The Blueprint: Restoring the Rule of Law Collection (Brennan Center for Justice)
      • What it offers: While tracking the ongoing damage of executive overreach—such as arbitrary funding freezes and the politicization of independent agencies—the Brennan Center continuously produces core policy solutions. Their frameworks outline how Congress and future reformers can codify strict statutory guardrails to insulate federal law enforcement, protect inspectors general, and reassert legislative authority over federal spending.

        Section 5: Editorial Conclusion — Hardening the
        Democratic Shield

        From the Desk of DrWeb: We must strip away all remaining illusions. The crisis that has unfolded since January 2025 is not a mere aberration of history, nor is it a temporary deviation from an otherwise stable trajectory. It is the predictable outcome of an political architecture that relied far too heavily on the “gentlemen’s agreements” of a bygone era.

        We, as informed citizens, operated under the naive assumption that norm enforcement and a basic respect for the rule of law were hardcoded into the American psyche. We were wrong. The guardrails did not hold because they were made of paper, easily incinerated by a cynical demagogue, a con man, and a deeply destructive individual who viewed the highest office in the land as a shield against accountability and an engine for personal enrichment.

        First, we must confront the corrupted apex of our judicial system. The capture of the Supreme Court by a hyper-partisan, unaccountable cabal has provided the legal cover for this authoritarian experiment. We must expand the United States Supreme Court to 12 or 15 seats, neutralizing the engineered conservative supermajority. This expansion must be paired with enforceable, strict ethical codes, term limits for justices, and explicit statutory boundaries that strip the Court of its ability to grant presidents immunity for criminal acts committed in office. The Court must also fix the benefits and pay for the Court members, staff, or others. Without lifetime appointments, their pay should be as Congress members, or Circuit Court judges. No more high-paid Justices.

        Second, we must structurally eliminate the vulnerabilities that allowed this administration to hijack the federal apparatus. Congress must pass a comprehensive, non-negotiable Protecting Our Democracy Act that eliminates the loophole of Schedule F permanently, explicitly criminalizes the impoundment of appropriated funds, and restricts the abuse of the Insurrection Act. The pardon power must be constitutionally amended to prohibit self-pardons, preemptive pardons, and pardons for co-conspirators involved in insurrections or executive corruption. Finally, we must dismantle the financial incentives of demagoguery by codifying strict transparency requirements, forcing the absolute divestment of personal businesses by the executive, and mandating the public disclosure of all tax returns and foreign financial ties. The work ahead is monumental. It will require an unyielding commitment to institutional reconstruction. But it is the only path forward if we are to ensure that government of the people, by the people, for the people, does not perish from this earth.

        Bibliography Key Sources


        After Rhode Island Victory, Connecticut Libraries Call on More States to Address Predatory E-Book Pricing (Statement by the Connecticut Library Consortium)

        0

        Here’s the Full Text of a Statement by the Connecticut Library Consortium:

        The Connecticut Library Consortium (CLC) today congratulated Rhode Island lawmakers on passing legislation to address unfair e-book and audiobook licensing practices and called on additional states to pursue similar reforms.

        Rhode Island’s action comes as libraries across the country continue to struggle under a digital licensing system that forces taxpayers to pay repeatedly for access to books they never truly own. Under current publisher licensing models, libraries can pay up to ten times the consumer price for a single e-book license and may be required to repurchase that same title after just 26 checkouts or two years to retain access.  For many libraries, the result is a growing share of digital materials budgets being spent simply replacing expired licenses rather than expanding collections, reducing wait times, or purchasing books by new and emerging authors.

        “Rhode Island lawmakers looked at the facts and reached the same conclusion Connecticut lawmakers reached last year: the current system isn’t working for libraries, readers, or taxpayers,” said Ellen Paul, Executive Director of the Connecticut Library Consortium. “Libraries are paying more and more each year just to maintain access to the books people already want to read. That’s not sustainable for public institutions or the communities they serve.”

        Connecticut enacted its own e-book legislation in 2025 after lawmakers concluded that existing digital licensing practices placed an unreasonable burden on libraries and taxpayers. The legislation was approved overwhelmingly by the General Assembly, passing 35-1 in the Senate and 106-38 in the House.

        Rhode Island’s victory is particularly notable because it came after an unusually visible campaign by publishing interests, including public advertising, opinion pieces, and warnings that publishers could stop selling digital content to libraries in the state. Despite those efforts, Rhode Island lawmakers overwhelmingly determined that reform was necessary.

        “It’s exciting to see Rhode Island and other states taking action after Connecticut passed our landmark e-book bill,” said State Representative Eleni Kavros DeGraw, House Chair of Connecticut’s Planning and Development Committee. “This legislation shows how unfair e-book pricing is to our libraries and to our taxpayers and we must stand as a united front against a multi-billion dollar industry.”

        Library leaders emphasized that reforming digital licensing practices is not about harming authors. In fact, libraries argue that lower licensing costs would allow them to purchase more titles from more authors. Today, libraries often must devote significant portions of their digital budgets to repeatedly relicensing a small number of high-demand titles, leaving fewer resources available to discover and promote debut, local, and midlist authors.

        Connecticut’s law was intentionally designed to encourage broader national action. It cannot take effect until additional states representing a combined population of seven million people enact substantially similar legislation. Rhode Island’s passage represents meaningful progress toward that goal, but additional states are still needed.

        “Connecticut acted. Rhode Island acted. Other states are actively considering similar legislation,” Paul said. “The momentum is growing because the problem is real. Libraries should be able to invest in readers and collections, not spend taxpayer dollars repeatedly renting the same books from some of the largest publishing companies in the world.”

         

        The post After Rhode Island Victory, Connecticut Libraries Call on More States to Address Predatory E-Book Pricing (Statement by the Connecticut Library Consortium) appeared first on Library Journal infoDOCKET.

        Read original article: Read More

        1979: How the U.S. and Iran Went From Allies to Enemies

        0

        At the heart of the current U.S. war against Iran is an inconvenient truth: that the United States is, in many ways, responsible for creating the very regime it now seeks to topple.
        Today, Scott Anderson, a New York Times Magazine contributor, tells the story of America’s outsize role in the Islamic Revolution, and why all these years later we’re still no closer to understanding Iran.
        Guest: Scott Anderson, a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine.
        Background reading: It has been a trying time for the Islamic republic of Iran.
        Photo: George Tames/The New York Times
        For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 
        Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.  Read original article: Read More

        Last Call for #alaac26 Live Bloggers!

        The ALA Annual Conference is coming up in just two weeks! (June 25 – June 29, 2026). The ALSC Blog plans to offer updates about what is happening at the Conference with a team of volunteer guest bloggers. Are you attending? Would you be interested in writing brief updates about the programs you attend, the speakers you hear, or the information you are learning? It’s not too late to join our Conference Blogging Team. Let us know of your interest by filling out the Conference Blogging Interest Form. Looking forward to hearing from you!
        The post Last Call for #alaac26 Live Bloggers! appeared first on ALSC Blog.  Read original article: Read More