Home Blog Page 3

Warner Music Group Acquires Sureel AI to Protect Artists’ Image, Work – Variety

Terms of the deal were not disclosed. Sureel, founded in 2022, works to track how artists’ content are used by generative AI models, using patented …

The Iran War’s Devastating Butterfly Effect

0

The war in Iran has had some visible consequences, like skyrocketing energy costs and higher gas prices, but the effects of this war are often far less obvious and much more serious for the world’s most vulnerable people.
Today, Peter S. Goodman tells us what he learned on a recent trip to Somalia, and why the system of global aid is no longer in a position to help.
Guest: Peter S. Goodman covers the global economy for The New York Times.
Background reading: Catastrophe is emerging in the world’s most vulnerable places as the war in Iran causes soaring costs for food, fuel and fertilizer.
Photo: Finbarr O’Reilly for The New York Times
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.  Read original article: Read More

4 At-Home Summer Literacy Strategies

As summer approaches, families may be searching for ways to support literacy development at home. Last month, I wrote about how to speak with caregivers about literacy. In that post, I mentioned the importance of empowering families by offering a few practical suggestions that are easy to infuse into daily routines. Below are 4 simple strategies you can share that align with key literacy concepts. These strategies all follow Science of Reading principles. In addition to sharing with families, you can also use these strategies into your own programming to build literacy skills with patrons!  Go on a Sound Scavenger Hunt While on a walk outside or on line at the store, ask your child to look for objects that start with certain sounds. For example, how many things can we find that start with the /b/ sound? This is practicing phonemic awareness, which is the ability to identify, hear,…
The post 4 At-Home Summer Literacy Strategies appeared first on ALSC Blog.  Read original article: Read More

Teen Pride Graphic Novels

0

Here are some fantastic new stories to enjoy during Pride, all lushly illustrated.  MS = middle school  In Balazs Lorinczi’s book A Bite of Pepper, a skateboarding vampire falls for a human artist whose attraction to her might be enough to make her commit to turning this human into a vampire and becoming immortal herself.    Dan in Green Gables, by Ray Terciero, follows a queer teen in Read original article: Read More

What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years – IFLScience

space-iconSpace and Physicsspace-iconAstronomy

Satellite antenna at a ground station.
Satellite antenna at a ground station.Image credit: woodvillage / shutterstock.com

clock-iconPUBLISHED Yesterday

Global “Post-Detection Protocols” For Disclosing Alien Life Just Got Their First Major Update In 16 Years – “No Reply Should Be Sent”

James Felton headshot

By James Felton, Senior Staff Writer

James is a published author with multiple pop-history and science books to his name. He specializes in history, space, strange science, and anything out of the ordinary. View full profile

Katy Evans headshot

Edited by Katy Evans



The “post-detection protocols” for announcing the discovery and existence of alien life have just had their first major update in 16 years, though the all-important “no reply” rule remains in place.

The universe is a pretty big place, and humans have only recently begun scouring it for signs of other intelligent lifeforms. While so far all we have heard is a great and eerie silence, there remains the chance that as our telescopes and understanding of the universe improve, we may one day find what we are looking for; signs of an alien intelligence, out there in the cosmos.

What should we do about it if we were to detect such a sign, be it a directed signal from a technological species, or telltale bio signatures on a distant exoplanet? What steps should scientists take next? 

“We do not shout ‘alien’ the moment we see a strange blip”

These are questions that the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the broader search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) institute have put their minds to, first creating the “Declaration of Principles Concerning the Conduct of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence” in 1989. These guidelines lay out what scientists should do at each stage of a detection, including how these findings should be communicated to the public. That latter task has gotten more difficult in recent years, and it was this area that had the greatest overhaul in the new 2026 update.

“The information environment we operate in today is vastly more complex than it was in 2010,” Professor Michael Garrett, Chair of the IAA SETI Committee and professor of astrophysics at the University of Manchester, explained in a statement

“In an era of deepfakes, automated misinformation, and instant global connectivity, unverified claims could trigger confusion or panic. These new protocols guide SETI scientists in maintaining the highest standards of evidence before making announcements to the world.” 

The guidance states that safeguards should be established for scientists involved in potential detections, who may face harassment or doxxing due to their involvement. Meanwhile, they establish the need to manage “viral” rumors about detections and potential detections, and the complex task of distinguishing the truth from potential hoaxes.

Overall the guidelines remain roughly the same, adhering to Carl Sagan’s principle that “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” The first step, as with previous guidance, is to verify any candidate detection of alien life and to seek independent examination of evidence by other organizations, preferably using other methods and instruments.

“We do not shout ‘alien’ the moment we see a strange blip,” Garrett added. “The scientific method demands we check, check again, and then ask others to check. Only when we have reached a consensus that a signal is credible do we bring it to the world.” 

Nevertheless, these updated guidelines are not as prohibitory as the previous iteration, released before the rise of social media, in 2010. In the update, it is explained that scientists have no obligation to disclose verification efforts until a discovery is made, including through the media, and on social media. However, scientists should make use of these channels and respond to reasonable requests, the guidance states, though they should clearly identify speculative or unconfirmed conclusions as such.

“If a candidate technosignature is discovered, communication about ongoing observations and analyses may be necessary to dispel rumors and provide accurate and reliable information,” the declaration states. “Similarly, if analysis determines that a previously reported candidate technosignature is not extraterrestrial in origin, this should be promptly disclosed and clearly communicated.”

When a verification is made, the scientists involved are then obliged to report their discovery promptly “in a full, complete and open manner to the public, the scientific community, and the Secretary General of the United Nations.”

Scientists should also take steps to protect the evidence of a detection, according to the updated guidelines. This could be in the form of protecting certain frequencies, for example, if the evidence came in the form of an electromagnetic signal. 

Read more: What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years – IFLScience

Continue/Read Original Article: What Happens If We Detect Aliens? The Official Playbook Just Changed In First Major Update In 16 Years | IFLScience

House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

Congress

Bill would also split off hiring of copyright office head, giving the president control

Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., leaves a meeting of the House Republican Conference at the Capitol Hill Club in March. The House on Monday passed his bill that would change how the librarian of Congress is appointed.
Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., leaves a meeting of the House Republican Conference at the Capitol Hill Club in March. The House on Monday passed his bill that would change how the librarian of Congress is appointed. (Tom Williams / CQ Roll Call)

By Nina Heller, Posted June 8, 2026 at 4:32pm

House lawmakers passed a bill Monday aimed at preventing future executive branch interference in some legislative branch agencies, a year after President Donald Trump fired the librarian of Congress.

It would allow House and Senate leaders to appoint the heads of both the Library of Congress and the Government Publishing Office, removing that power from the president. 

But the president would get new appointment authority over another role, the register of copyrights. Historically part of the Library of Congress, the Copyright Office has long drawn debate over its proper place.

The bill was passed by a voice vote. Now it heads to the Senate, where it would need enough bipartisan support to overcome a filibuster. 

“At its core, this bill is about ensuring that agencies of the legislative branch are governed in a manner consistent with our constitutional system, improving continuity in leadership and strengthening congressional oversight,” Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., the lead sponsor, said on the floor Monday.

While the firing of Librarian Carla Hayden put the issue in the spotlight last year, Griffith said he was taking a longer view.

“I feel like doing that disclaimer at the end of a movie: This has nothing to do with any current or former librarians of Congress, or any current or former members of the White House,” he said at a House Administration Committee markup last month. 

It’s not the first time lawmakers have sought to change how heads of legislative branch agencies are hired and fired. In 2023, lawmakers approved a change that revoked the president’s power to appoint the architect of the Capitol, transferring that authority to Congress instead. 

And in 2017, Virginia Republican Rep. Bob Goodlatte, who was then chair of the House Judiciary Committee, proposed allowing the president to appoint the register of copyrights with input from a congressional panel and with the advice and consent of the Senate. In the past, the librarian of Congress has picked the head of the Copyright Office. That bill passed the House but stalled in the other chamber.

Proponents of splitting off the copyright office from the Library of Congress say it’s the right approach because much of its work is executive in nature. The office both advises Congress on intellectual property issues and administers copyright laws.

Goodlatte has remained engaged with the issue since leaving Congress and has lobbied on behalf of the Walt Disney Company around Griffith’s bill, according to disclosures

But not everyone is happy with the proposal, with some arguing it could potentially politicize copyright and artificial intelligence governance issues. After Trump ousted Hayden last May, he also moved to fire Register of Copyrights Shira Perlmutter, shortly after her office published a draft report warning about AI models being trained on copyrighted materials and the effects on fair use law. Perlmutter has challenged her firing in court. 

A number of technology, library and public interest groups have come out against the bill and its plan for the copyright office, saying it “threatens to upend a system that has protected and supported American creativity and ingenuity for centuries.” 

“Maintaining institutional unity through challenges such as emerging AI policy and DMCA rulemakings is vital to ensuring copyright evolution remains balanced, accessible, and ready to support the next generation of creators and tech innovators,” Brandon Butler, executive director of the Re:Create Coalition, said in a statement Monday. 

The coalition, which includes groups like the American Library Association and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, had previously written a letter to House Administration Committee members criticizing a lack of hearings on the topic.

Read more: House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

Continue/Read Original Article: House votes to take over librarian of Congress appointment power  – Roll Call

“Burning Down The House” – David Byrne feat. Stephen Colbert (LIVE on The Late Show) – YouTube

Editor’s Note: I watched the final The Late Show episode from my TiVDo, and the final music act was great.. CBS, in the censorship game, removes him from the show, cancelled it. –DrWeb

Original Source: “Burning Down The House” – David Byrne feat. Stephen Colbert (LIVE on The Late Show) – YouTube

Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS

By Brian Tyler Cohen, June 4, 2026

NEW YORK, NY – NOVEMBER 07: Journalist Scott Pelley speaks onstage at the annual Freedom Award Benefit hosted by the International Rescue Committee at The Waldorf-Astoria on November 7, 2012 in New York City. (Photo by Michael Loccisano / Getty Images for IRC)

This administration’s assault on the media has been relentless. I’d like to say it’s also shocking in the sheer scale of it, but honestly, I’m not surprised. Since Day One of Trump’s second term, he’s been demanding that media companies pay him tens of millions of dollars (Paramount, ABC, Disney), and demanding the firing of late-night hosts who hurt his feelings. These were all red flags. But Scott Pelley’s firing from “60 Minutes” this week is the one that stopped me cold.

Pelley was terminated Tuesday after confronting new executive producer Nick Bilton — a man with, in Pelley’s words, “slender” qualifications for the job — about the recent firings of longtime “60 Minutes” producers. When Pelley met with Bari Weiss and Bilton and asked for answers, they stonewalled him for ten minutes. He was fired the next day. Bilton’s termination letter claimed Pelley had “hijacked” a staff meeting. Pelley called Weiss’ public account of their falling out “disingenuous.”

This is what the end of an institution looks like. Weiss was installed at CBS News as a compliant mouthpiece for the Trump-allied Ellisons, who bought Paramount and now need government approval for a merger that would also hand them control of CNN. Government collaborators are on the verge of controlling a massive share of American news, and they’re pushing out the journalists who won’t play along. First, Anderson Cooper walked away, then came the firings of Tanya Simon, Cecilia Vega, Sharyn Alfonsi and now Pelley. The institutional knowledge lost in the brain drain will irreparably damage an American institution. 

I wrote about this in my book, “The Day After,” putting it in the full historical context it deserves. This is an exclusive excerpt. 


Under Trump’s second coming, the Foxification of the media has accelerated. Media companies are not just acquiescing to Trump’s coercion; they are actively turning themselves into a pale imitation of a Roger Ailes creation.

The leader of the pack is Skydance Media, which in August 2025 bought Paramount in an $8 billion deal that includes the movie studios, the CBS broadcast network, and Paramount’s cable channels such as Comedy Central and Nickelodeon. The deal sailed through the FCC approval process because Brendan Carr had already shaken down his targets.

In particular, he was ready to take his metaphorical baseball bat to CBS News because of a discrepancy between two edits of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in the final weeks of the 2024 presidential campaign. The difference between the two interviews was microscopic. But it was all Trump needed to claim that he’d been the victim of a great media conspiracy. Even less than the ABC News error, the CBS News edit was barely worthy of a clarification, never mind a correction. The slim pickings didn’t deter Trump from filing a $20 billion lawsuit — that’s billion with a b — against CBS and Paramount in October 2024.

Read more: Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

Continue/Read Original Article: Bari Weiss & co put the BS in CBS – Democracy Docket

Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History (w/ Matt Dinan)

Pull up a chair and pour yourself a drink! For the third installment in our occasional series on important conservative books, or important books written by or embraced by conservatives, we take up Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History, based on his 1949 Walgreen Lectures at the University of Chicago (where he taught for two decades) and published in 1953. To help us, we called on our friend Matt Dinan, a political theorist who’s associate professor in the Great Books Program at St. Thomas University in New Brunswick, Canada. If you’ve listened to previous episodes and wanted us to go deeper on Leo Strauss, the German-Jewish political philosopher who came to the United States after fleeing Nazism, “Straussianism,” and what they might have to do with American conservatism and our present political moment, here you go.
After offering some background on Strauss and the context of Natural Right and History’s publication, we discuss Strauss’s patriotic appeal to Americans in the book’s introduction, walk listeners through the chapters that follow (explaining what “natural right” is and why it’s paired with “history” in the title along the way), and close out by exploring Strauss’s ambiguous relationship to American conservatism—and more!
Sources:
Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History (1953)
— On Tyranny (1963)
— Spinoza’s Critique of Religion (1965)
Harry V. Jaffa, Thomism and Aristotelianism: A Study of the Commentary by Thomas Aquinas on the Nicomachean Ethics (1952)
James W. Ceaser, “The American Context of Leo Strauss’s Natural Right and History,” Perspectives on Political Science, Spring 2008
Richard Velkley, Heidegger, Strauss, and the Premises of Philosophy: On Original Forgetting (2011)
— “On the Roots of Rationalism: Strauss’s ‘Natural Right and History’ as Response to Heidegger,” The Review of Politics, Spring 2008
…and don’t forget to subscribe to Know Your Enemy on Patreon for access to all of our bonus episodes! Read original article: Read More

Maine Votes as Graham Platner’s Past Poses New Conundrums

0

On Tuesday, Maine will vote in a high-stakes primary contest for a Senate seat that Democrats think they can win back from Republicans for the first time in decades. Democrats are pinning their hopes on Graham Platner, a progressive who has faced a string of scandals.
Today, Lisa Lerer and Katie Glueck discuss what this race means for Maine and for the prospects of the Democratic Party.
Guest: 

Lisa Lerer, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
Katie Glueck, a political reporter at The New York Times.

Background reading: 

Several women who dated Mr. Platner recall “unsettling” behavior.
Politicians, officials and strategists have wrestled with how to respond to new reporting on Mr. Platner’s past behavior.

Photo: Amanda Sabga/Reuters
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.  Read original article: Read More