No, our museums cannot just ‘move on’ from slavery — Christmas shows us why

Without endorsing racial bondage, his call encourages MAGA’s white supremacist elements and discourages efforts to address racial disparities relating to slavery’s long-term constraints on Black progress.
As someone who has long studied, taught and written about the American South and slavery, I am appalled. Trump’s position trivializes the injustices and horrors of enslavement, implying they barely merit mention within America’s historical narrative.
I propose, counterintuitively, to rebut Trump’s messaging by looking microscopically at the moment in the plantation calendar when slaves supposedly were treated best. By illuminating how horrific racial bondage was even when legend says enslavers were at their most humane, we can grasp the ahistorical absurdity of Trump’s position that museums move on.
That time was Christmas. There is a near-consensus that slaves were happiest, if you can say such a thing, over the holiday. Supposedly, starting Christmas Eve, slaves not only were excused from working for up to a week, but masters put whips aside, gave them amazingly generous presents, threw them sumptuous feasts and dances, and allowed them to marry and travel anywhere nearby they wanted.
The trouble is this stereotype derives largely from memoirs of post-Civil War “Lost Cause” southern writers who reimagined slave holidays to justify southern secession and the Confederacy. Such writings overlooked the vast profits accruing to slaveholders from coerced labor and sometimes claimed that slaves had it better than masters and lacked interest in freedom.
Read More…
Continue/Read Original Article Here: The reality of slavery: Rebutting Trump’s claims
Discover more from DrWeb's Domain
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
