Law
The Supreme Court is in its final stretch this term. Here are the major cases left

Updated June 12, 20265:14 PM ET
The U.S. Supreme Court is heading into its crunch time, the part of the year when the justices are racing to finish decisions and dissents in the cases that remain undecided.
There are 23 cases left, out of the 58 that have been argued. Two major cases have already been decided: One essentially gutted what remained of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, prompting Republicans in a number of Southern states to redraw congressional maps to diminish or eliminate majority-Black districts that have elected Black members of Congress.
The second major case that has been decided struck down President Trump’s tariff program because the court said Congress had not authorized it, and Trump exceeded his authority in doing it on his own.
Many of the most difficult and controversial cases, however, remain to be decided in the coming weeks, with the justices aiming to conclude their work by the end of June or early July. The Supreme Court is next expected to release decisions on Thursday, June 18.
So what’s left?
Birthright citizenship
Trump v. Barbara
Trump has long maintained that the Constitution does not guarantee birthright citizenship for babies born on U.S. soil, and on the first day of his second term in office, he signed an executive order barring citizenship for children born in the U.S. if parents entered the country illegally or if the parents are living and working in the U.S. legally with temporary visas. The executive order never went into effect because every lower court judge to review it concluded, in the words of one, that the order was “blatantly unconstitutional.” Specifically, the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, enacted after the Civil War, says that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
While almost all scholars interpret that language broadly, and as applying to all babies born in the U.S., Trump himself maintains that it applies only to the children of former slaves, and definitely not to the children of those in the U.S. illegally or the children of noncitizens living here legally.
Read more about the case:
- A once-fringe theory on birthright citizenship comes to the Supreme Court
- Supreme Court majority seems inclined to rule against Trump on birthright citizenship
- As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here’s how Americans feel about it
- Trump attends Supreme Court arguments over his executive order, a presidential first
Trans bans in sports
Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.
At issue are laws recently enacted in about half the states that ban trans girls and women from participating in women’s sports at publicly funded schools. Before the court are two cases — one involving varsity competition at colleges and universities, and the other involving sports in high schools. Supporters of the bans say the laws are needed to prevent athletes whose assigned sex at birth was male from having an unfair advantage in women’s sports. Opponents of the bans say they discriminate based on sex, in violation of both federal law and the Constitution’s guarantee to equal protection of the law. And for athletes at every level, the issue is deeply personal, with tennis greats Billie Jean King and Martina Navratilova on opposing sides, along with hundreds of other athletes.
Read more: Supreme Court: Here are the cases that are still to be decided – NPRContinue/Read Original Article: Supreme Court: Here are the cases that are still to be decided : NPR
Discover more from DrWeb's Domain
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
