Home Blog Page 5

Stars forge and deliver the elements that make up your body — and scientists may finally know how

0

Read More

Scientists are closer than ever before to understanding how stars forge the elements that comprise our planet, bodies and pretty much everything else around us — and they’re gaining a clearer picture of where star explosions fit into the story.

New research reported in two different papers looks at how stars forge elements as they explode and how these supernova explosions spread those elements — and other elements stars have forged during their lifetimes — throughout the cosmos.

Astronomers have been studying the bright supernova deaths of massive stars for centuries, but they still don’t quite understand how these explosions proceed.

The first paper looked at one way to investigate supernovas. It uses a radioactive element produced by these explosions called titanium-44, which lingers long after supernovas fade. Researchers have now collected experimental evidence that determines how much titanium-44 is created in a supernova, finding that these cosmic explosions produce 35% more of this element than expected.

With this knowledge in hand, scientists can now develop robust computer models of supernovas and compare these models with astronomical observations. This could bring them much closer to understanding how these explosions progress.

“It’s exciting to see just how far the field has come,” Christopher Cousins, a postdoctoral researcher in the University of Surrey’s Nuclear Physics Group, said in a statement. “A measurement like this would have been considered out of reach only a couple of decades ago, but it now gives us new insight into one of the biggest unanswered questions in astrophysics.”

An illustration shows a

An illustration shows a “vampire” neutron star feeding on a close companion star. (Image credit: Robert Lea (created with Canva))

The second paper honed in on a particular brand of stellar explosion called a Type I supernova. These occur when a dense stellar remnant called a neutron star drags material from a companion stellar body. The intense gravitational influence of the neutron star — a stellar corpse that has one to two times the mass of the sun crammed into a body about 12 miles (20 kilometers) wide — means that, when this stolen stellar matter hits their surfaces, a thermonuclear explosion is triggered.

These blasts forge heavy elements and release incredible amounts of energy, some in the form of X-ray bursts.

The authors of this paper, hailing from the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) in Michigan, studied the nuclear reaction that triggers X-ray bursts in greater detail than has been possible before.

This revealed the long-debated role of the so-called nickel-copper cycle, the temporary trapping of nuclear material during supernovas. Scientists previously didn’t know if material was trapped in the nickel-copper cycle during X-ray bursts.

This research reveals that this does happen, but only in small proportions. It gives scientists a clearer picture of how Type I supernovas proceed.

An illustration shows a supernova explosion bombarding Earth with neutrinos

An illustration shows a supernova explosion bombarding Earth. (Image credit: Super-Kamiokande Collaboration)

“Despite decades of research, we still don’t fully understand the nuclear reactions that power some of the universe’s most spectacular stellar explosions,” said Gavin Lotay of the University of Surrey.

“These two studies give us a much clearer picture of how these explosions happen, allowing us to compare our models more closely with astronomical observations and bringing us closer to understanding how the chemical elements are created and spread throughout the universe,” he added.

The two papers were published in the July edition of the journal Physical Review Letters.

 

Hubble Telescope sees spectacular ‘superbubble’ | Space photo of the day for Sept. 4, 2026

0

Read More

Lots of sparkles and glowing dots among smoky tendrils of gas.

This nebula is named LHA 120-N44, or N44 for short, and it’s located in the constellation Dorado. (Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, D. Gouliermis)

About 160,000 light-years away lies one of our Milky Way’s little galactic neighbors: The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). And thanks to a new observing program, the Hubble Space Telescope has provided us with an intricate image of a nebula in the LMC. The surprising part? There’s a giant void at the center. Scientists call it a “superbubble.”

What is it?

What you’re seeing in this image is a nebula within the LMC known as LHA 120-N44, or simply N44. It’s located in the constellation of Dorado and, like a classic nebula, is the site of stars being born at a noticeably rapid rate.

But of course, what really can’t be missed is the huge hole at the center of N44’s dusty tendrils — this is the “superbubble,” and its dimensions are staggering. NASA says it’s about 210 by 140 light-years across — a truly unimaginable size, considering the distance between our sun and Pluto isn’t even a single light-year.

One light-year, the distance light travels in a year, is about 6 trillion miles (9.7 trillion kilometers).

Why is it noteworthy?

The superbubble is a bit of a mystery, but one theory of why it exists is that stars at the center of the bubble could have undergone supernova explosions or have released stellar winds that swept away gas in the nebula. This could have resulted in a “void,” as NASA calls it, surrounded by a gaseous shell. That would explain away the image we see pretty well, but there will likely be studies dedicated to refining that story.

Of note, in that shell around the superbubble, stars continue to form and show themselves as beautiful little specks across the watercolor-like landscape.

Something else interesting about this image is that N44 is what’s known as an “emission nebula,” meaning the gas you see has been energized by stars in the area. This enhances the luminescent quality of the portrait.

This is because the energization process, or ionization to be specific, generates ionized gas that ultimately must cool down. During that cooling, it goes from a higher energy state to a lower energy state and thus releases some energy. This energy loss causes N44 to glow brightly, creating the beautiful scene we see.

The reason scientists have used the Hubble Space Telescope to study N44 is this particular nebula offers good conditions to study star formation and evolution. As a matter of fact, Hubble managed to survey nearly half a million stars in and around the cluster, 30,000 of which are in the very early stages of their lives.

N44 has been a major topic of interest for quite some time. For instance, it made headlines in 2021 as well as in 2012 — both times due to Hubble’s eye yet again — and observations with the Chandra X-ray Observatory led to a 2011 paper that discusses supernova shock waves and other phenomena shaping the nebula and its cavity.

 

On this day in space! Sept. 4, 1962: NASA’s Mariner 2 spacecrafts performs the 1st-ever maneuver in deep space so it could reach Venus

0

Read More

On Sept. 4, 1962, NASA’s Mariner 2 spacecraft performed the first-ever rocket maneuver in deep space as it did a quick mid-course correction on its way to Venus. It had launched just eight days earlier and needed to burn its engines to ensure that its trajectory would take it to Venus.

The midcourse maneuver was necessary because the Atlas-Agena rocket that launched Mariner 2 didn’t launch with enough accuracy to get the trajectory right in one shot. When it was about 1.5 million miles (2.4 million km) from Earth, it fired its engines to help steer it in the right direction.

The entire maneuver required five separate commands sent from mission control, telling the spacecraft to roll, pitch, turn and burn its motor. One hundred days later, Mariner 2 flew by Venus and became the first spacecraft to successfully fly by another planet.

Why it mattered

NASA's Mariner 2 spacecraft on a starry background in an illustration

An artist’s illustration of NASA’s Mariner 2 spacecraft in deep space. (Image credit: NASA)

Tweaking a spacecraft’s course in deep space seems a bit routine these days (NASA’s newly launched Roman Space Telescope just performed such a feat this week), but in 1962 — when reaching another planet with a probe was still the stuff of fiction — it was far from a safe bet.

Mariner 2 launched in Aug. 27, 1962 on what would eventually be the first successful misson to another world. But as stated above, the launch wasn’t accurate enough to place Mariner 2 on a direct course for Venus.

That’s where the mid-course correction came in. The mission team designed a short engine burn that directed Mariner 2 to roll itself about 9.33 degrees, pitch its nose around 139.83 degrees so that it could turn its rocket engine to face forward, firing the engine, as Time Magazine recounted. The entire process took up to 36 minutes.

Without the mid-course correction, Mariner 2 would have missed Venus entirely. After launch, Mariner 2 was on a heading that would carry it only within 238,600 miles (384,000 kilometers) of the planet’s center, then speed on by, according to NASA’s official Mariner 2 report. After the course correction, Mariner 2 was on a path to fly by at a much closer distance of 21,607 miles (34,773 km).

Today, such mid-course corrections are a regular part of space mission planning, though they are still critical moments since a mission’s success can hinge on their results. In the decades since Mariner 2, space mission designers have achieved amazing feats in mid-course changes, including the now familar gravity assist flybys that allowed NASA to send Voyager 2 on its Grand Tour of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Many other missions have achieved such feats.

Even this week, on Sept. 3, 2026, the BepiColombo mission to Mercury performed its own mid-course event, with the mission’s Mercury Transfer Module releasing its two spacecraft (one each for Europe and Japan) to begin their arrival at Mercury. The event came eight years after launch and followed a series of maneuvers, including nine planetary flybys to reach the planet.

Want more space history? Check out our full On This Day In Space Story archive and watch our On This Day In Space videos on YouTube.

 

Lit Hub Daily: September 4, 2026

0

Read Moref scott fitzgerald TODAY: In 1919, F. Scott Fitzgerald gives the manuscript of This Side of Paradise to his friend Shane Leslie to deliver to Maxwell Perkins, editor at Charles Scribner’s Sons in New York.

 

The Intertwined Legacies of Gloria Steinem and Dolly Parton

0

Read More 

Gloria Steinem, the feminist icon and co-founder of Ms. magazine, died on Wednesday at her home in Manhattan. Her death came as many were still grieving the loss of another iconic woman: Dolly Parton.

On paper, the connections between the two women seem superficial, but for the Times Magazine writer Susan Dominus, the relationship between their lives and impact is inescapable.

Guest: 

  • Susan Dominus, a staff writer at The New York Times Magazine.
  • Letty Cottin Pogrebin, a writer and pioneer of the feminist movement who was part of the team that founded Ms. magazine with Gloria Steinem.

Background reading: 

Photo: Robin Platzer/Getty Images

For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

 

Is Time Even Real? Does It Even Flow?

0

Read More

You might consider time to be such a fundamental feature of our existence that there really is nothing profound or meaningful that we can say about it. Maybe time, like space, simply is. Many have even argued time out of existence altogether. For example, if we were to split it up into three components: the past, the present and the future, then we can examine each in turn.

Those who deny the reality of time will say something like this: The past has happened and is gone; all we have left of it is the record of past events (in our memories, or in books, photographs, or on film), all of which can only ever form a part of the present moment (when we access those records). But the events themselves no longer exist. In contrast, all there is of the future is our predictions, hopes, and beliefs about what might happen, which are again states of our minds in the present. Regardless of whether the future is predetermined or not, it has yet to exist.

That leaves the present moment itself; surely “now” is real. But although we “feel” that our now is a solid, changing moment steadily sweeping through time, converting the future into the past, it is nonetheless just an instant and as such does not have any duration. The physical definition of “now” is not a minute long or a second long, the time deniers will argue; it is the edge of the shadow between light and dark, between what is to happen and what has happened. It has no thickness. The constantly changing present moment is no more than a dividing line between past and future and so does not have a tangible existence of its own.

Einstein famously stated that “the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

Thus, if none of the three components of time exist, then there is nothing left, leaving the whole of time as illusory! Many thinkers going back two and half thousand years have argued thus.

If this all sounds like a clever sleight-of-hand, don’t worry: A number of philosophers of time, and physicists for that matter, subscribe to a diametrically opposite view, known as “eternalism.” This holds that all three components—past, present and future—are equally real! This idea, which we will examine more closely later on, emerges from an idea called the block universe, which gained prominence after Einstein put forward his first theory of relativity, in which time is regarded as the fourth dimension of spacetime. In this picture all moments in time coexist in the same way that all points in space exist. Einstein famously stated that “the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

If you don’t fancy either of these radical views: that time doesn’t exist at all or that all times exist, then there is a halfway house known as philosophical “presentism,” which holds that while the past and future do not exist (one has happened and gone, and the other is yet to happen) the present moment is nevertheless real. A related idea is the “growing block universe” view, in which the past and the present exist while the future does not, but instead gradually comes into being.

So, you see all options are available on the menu. But which of them is the correct one?

In fact, just to make sure you are fully aware of the scale of the problem and level of disagreement among people who have thought long and hard about the nature of time, it might even be the case that time is what is called an “emergent property” of reality, a bit like the concept of temperature, that only makes sense in our everyday world of experience, but becomes meaningless when we zoom in on the fundamental concepts that underpin reality.

The earliest arguments for the non-existence of time go back to the pre-Socratic Greek philosopher, Parmenides of Elea, in southwest Italy, who flourished in the fifth century BCE. Only fragments of his work survive, including his greatest work: a poem called On Nature, in which he describes two views of reality. The view of interest here is the first one, called The Way of Truth, in which he denies the reality of change, arguing that change is impossible and that its very notion is incoherent; rather that everything which exists is permanent and unchanging. Parmenides was no fool and presumably could clearly see change all around him, but like many of the ancient Greek thinkers he had talked himself down the rabbit hole of deductive logic from which it was hard to escape. He was certainly persuasive enough that his more famous student, Zeno, whom we will meet shortly, also held that continuous change, or a “flow” of time, is just an illusion.

Two thousand years later, Isaac Newton argued that time provides the backdrop for all change.

Another Greek philosopher worth mentioning is Heraclitus, who was born around 500 BCE in the city of Ephesus, now in modern Turkey. Little is known about his life, but what we do know paints him as a complex character and, as far as we can tell, a rather miserable one to boot. His philosophical ideas were, like him, paradoxical and cryptic to the extent that he earned the epithets “The Philosopher of Riddles” and “Heraclitus the Obscure.” Of interest here, however, is that his view of time stands in stark contrast to that of Parmenides. For Heraclitus was obsessed with change and viewed the world as being constantly in flux, always “becoming” but never “being.” The popular notion of a river of time, flowing past us, can be traced back to him.

That is not the only way philosophers throughout history have thought about flowing time. For instance, rather than thinking of time flowing past us as we stand on the riverbank, we can imagine that we are in a boat carried along by this river watching the world unfold. In fact, in this poetic example we would need to be facing away from the direction of travel, with our backs to the future, watching the past recede away from us, but never seeing what is coming up.

Two thousand years later, Isaac Newton argued that time provides the backdrop for all change. And because he believed that time is absolute and external, he argued that it continues to exist and flow even when there is no change. But it seems we still need time if we are to measure change.

However, while time may not require change in order to exist, what about the other way round: Does change require time? Well, one can easily think of examples involving things that change, but which are not necessarily changing over time. Atmospheric pressure changes when you climb to higher altitudes, the speed of a car changes when you press your foot on the accelerator pedal, the clarity of an image under a microscope changes when you use different lenses or alter their focus, and my mood changes when my football team wins or loses a match. However, in physics when we talk about changes over time we are generally referring to those quantities that vary dynamically, such that they are different at different moments of time.

The physicist Paul Davies dismisses the notion of a flowing time thus: “Attempts to ‘graft on’ a mysterious extra quality to bestow a flowing motion upon time which is simply ‘there’ is reminiscent of attempts to explain the vital quality of living organisms by adding a ‘life force’ or ‘elan vital’ to otherwise lifeless matter.” While we have the strong sense that we are moving through time—or conversely that time flows past us—this sensation of flowing time seems to be an entirely subjective experience.

After all, what could actually be flowing? If time flows then that would suggest it should be flowing at some rate, but what would we measure that rate against? Does time go by at a rate of one second per second? What does that even mean? And if it is our consciousness moving along some sort of static time axis, then how fast is it moving, and what (external) measure of time do we need to define this rate? The very notion of a rate of change is itself embedded within time.

But these states of the particle at different times are themselves just snapshots at certain instances. There is still no flowing time.

What does modern science have to say about all this? It is one thing to argue that there is continuous change along the time axis, or that moments are organised in a certain temporal order, but quite another to pin down exactly where in our objective description of reality it is that time flows in the way we experience it. The answer is that modern science has nothing whatsoever to say about the flow of time! The flow we experience in manifest time is completely absent in physical time. The closest physics gets to the notion of flowing time is in the theory of relativity where two observers, either moving relative to each other or experiencing different strength gravitational fields, disagree on how ‘fast’ the other person’s clock is ticking relative to their own.

In general, while time is an integral part of our mathematical description of nature, nowhere in our laws or equations of physics is there any hint that it actually “flows.” In our everyday language we say that “time passes,” “the time will arrive,” “the moment has gone” and so on. But we only sense that time flows. All that actually exists according to physical time is an ordered sequence of events: states of reality defined at different points (moments) on the time axis.

Consider what we do when we wish to describe the speed of a certain process. We either count the number of events in a given interval of time, such as the number of heartbeats per minute, or the amount of change in an interval of time, such as how much weight a baby has put on in one month. Time is the measuring stick against which we quantify change.

But if we look deeper at the equations of physics that allow us to calculate this change, we see that time comes in merely as a parameter: the symbol, t, that can take on any value. For example, a particle has a certain position, or is moving at a certain velocity, at a given value of t. These dynamical equations of motion then allow us to compute what the particle is doing at any other time, whether in its past or its future. In this way, we can see how the particle’s state changes, in the sense that it is different at different times. But these states of the particle at different times are themselves just snapshots at certain instances. There is still no flowing time.

It certainly seems that the strong sense we have of time continuously flowing from past to future is indeed just an illusion, however real it might seem to us. But while science is unable to provide a satisfactory explanation for this strong sense we have of passing time, and of a changing present moment, some physicists and philosophers think this is because there is something missing in the laws of physics.

They may just turn out to be right.

__________________________________

From On Time. Used with the permission of the publisher, Princeton University Press. Copyright © 2026 by Jim Al-Khalili

 

How to Get Over the Hump of Writing Sex

0

Read More

This first appeared in Lit Hub’s Craft of Writing newsletter—sign up here.

Only trouble is interesting, and what causes more trouble for us humans than our love lives? With love, we’re leaping into the unknown, and it’s thrilling, surprising, scary, overwhelming (and sometimes underwhelming and disappointing) all at once. Love is often unrequited, dangerous, or forbidden, and even when it’s straightforward, there’s still a story in it because we are mortal beings, hurtling toward an impending end, so at some point, we (or our beloved) will be left heartbroken; love’s trouble always makes for a good story. There’s a very successful publishing industry—the romance novel—dedicated to it.

The trouble with writing about love, and its bedfellow, sex, is it’s so elusive and mysterious that we often try to wrestle it into submission by assigning tired, old descriptions to it, or else we try to obfuscate what’s really happening and we slap a euphemism onto it. This is why there are so many clichés for love: Love is blind. Love at first sight. Love conquers all. Love makes the world go round. The problem is that these overused phrases say exactly nothing of this complex, mysterious emotion, which is why we must come up with new and strange ways of talking about love and lust. We may never be able to completely capture the complexities, but we must try.

Pep Talk: Getting Over the Hump of Writing Sex
When I was about six or seven, I heard the word fuck at school. I went home and asked my father what it meant. He said, “It means making love.” Then he told me not to ask any more questions. Within a few days, a picture book was left out for me. Where Did I Come From? by Peter Mayle features two pudgy characters who have sex under a colorful quilt. The man looks like a pink Pillsbury dough boy. I remember thinking that everything about the book was utterly bizarre, but the unsaid rule was that I would read it, and I wouldn’t ask questions. I learned that sex should be kept secret, but the truth is that our very existence depends on people having sex. It’s a natural function of our human bodies, and desire is a very normal emotion, even if we’re told that some forms of desire are unacceptable, even forbidden.

But isn’t desire the place where so many stories begin? Someone wants something. And then something gets in the way of that wanting, and all of a sudden, we have the conflict and we have a story.

Tips for Writing Great Sex

Exploit the Messiness
Having an orgasm is wonderful, but this is rarely the sole reason we want sex, so simplifying it in this way is a sure misfire. Maybe your narrator or character wants to feel loved or make someone fall in love with her. Maybe she wants to manipulate her partner or have an adventure or defy her parents or make sure her spouse finally leaves her for good. The key in any of these cases is to be emotionally honest when presenting the conflicting emotions of desire, whether you’re writing about revenge sex, break-up sex, make-up sex, dutiful sex, make-a-baby sex, forbidden sex, or even a frustrating failed sexual attempt.

Talk the Right Kind of Dirty
How would the characters in your piece (including your narrator) have described what was going on as it was happening? If the narrator was saying (or even thinking), “Fuck me harder,” and you write it as “Make sweet love to me,” you have totally missed the mark. I’ve heard people say there are no good ways to describe sex and genitalia, but actually, there are lots of ways—everything from edgy, colloquial slang to scientific jargon to poetic image and metaphor, but the language must reflect the tone. And if you’re writing bad sex, then maybe those clinical terms or even the disembodiment of your own body parts is needed by using “the” instead of “my,” as in the breasts, the thighs, the cunt. Did that last word make you uncomfortable?

If you’re going to write sex, you’ll have to get over that and allow yourself the full repertoire of sex diction. There are no synonyms; each situation calls for the correct word, and that word could very well be cunt. As writers, we must be able to own every word or at least take them out on loan. Use the words that suit the tone of the piece, and that might mean quieting your inner voice, or the voice of your mother.

Sometimes “bad” words make good writing. Be brave and unapologetic.

Break Stereotypes
One of the reasons stereotypes and clichés ruin our writing is because they are mostly untrue. I have never seen it rain cats and dogs, just as I haven’t been in the presence of an actual steaming-hot, throbbing member. (Maybe I’m missing something, but the word member reminds me of a club.) Even if you’re writing about stereotypically bad sex, your language should be fresh and surprising. Oscar Wilde says, “Everything in the world is about sex except for sex. Sex is about power.” While this may be true, don’t just reinforce traditional power dynamics. We see stereotypical representations of sex everywhere in popular culture, including my childhood picture book.

Here’s the text that accompanies the picture of the couple beneath the colorful quilt: “The man wants to get as close to the woman as he can, because he’s feeling very loving to her. And to get really close, the best thing he can do is lie on top of her and put his penis inside her, into her vagina.” The woman is the recipient of male desire: She is the object to his subject, the vessel that he must fill with his own need. How does the woman feel? We cannot know because we only get the man’s perspective. And why does this primer only show sex between a man and a woman? Why not show that men have sex with men and women have sex with women? And that people have sex with themselves. Despite what the book-ban people believe, sex is interesting and varied, and we must write it in all its complexities.

Our essays, poems, and stories about sex should reflect just how interesting and varied sex can be.

Sometimes Less Is More
Write the sex scene in all its fleshy detail, but in revision, ask yourself this: Does it serve the piece? Do the sex scenes move the story forward in some important way? Or maybe, the sex is the story. However, what’s left out can be sexier and more interesting than what remains. Bette Davis said, “I often think that a slightly exposed shoulder emerging from a long satin nightgown packs more sex than two naked bodies in bed.” If your explicit sex scene needs to be trimmed to the exposed shoulder, the ghost of those naked people will remain on the page. A digression can also imply a sex scene—an internal monologue, flashback, flash-forward, or metaphor. Anton Chekhov does this in his famous short story “The Lady with the Pet Dog.” What happens while we’re following Gurov’s internal monologue becomes obvious a few sentences later through Anna’s action and dialogue. She cries and tells him he won’t respect her. Then Gurov takes that famous bite of watermelon, a metaphor for what has just happened and his nonchalant reaction to it.

Writing Prompt #21: The Language of Sex

Think of all the words you would normally associate with sex, set your timer for five minutes, and list them—the clinical, the raunchy, the romantic. When your timer goes off, set it for another fifteen minutes and write a sex scene (in poetry, memoir, or fiction—you decide) without using any of the words on your list. This will force you to write about sex in a new way, reaching for fresh words to describe the sexual act. When your time’s up, have a look at what you’ve written. Is it the seed for a poem, story, essay, or chapter? Is it a scene that was needed in something you have already written?

Bonus Prompt: Unsexy Words for Sex

Do this writing exercise again, but this time, write down words you would never associate with sex, the most unsexy words you can think of, and then use those words in a sex scene. Hopefully, you will come up with a few interesting sentences you otherwise wouldn’t have chosen for this scene or poem, getting you over the hump to writing great sex.

___________________________________________


Adapted from 52 Writing Prompts: Inspiration for the Creative Writer by Suzanne Roberts by permission of the University of Nebraska Press. © 2026 Suzanne Roberts Available wherever books are sold or from the Univ. of Nebraska Press 800.848.6224 and at nebraskapress.unl.edu.

 

10 Literary Science Fiction and Fantasy Novels That Offer Hope for the Future

0

Read More

During graduate school, I finished the novel that found me an agent—but when my agent submitted it to publishers, all twenty of them turned the manuscript down. Truthfully, it was closer to a collection of loosely-linked short stories, and the feedback from editors was consistent: Pretty sentences. But nothing really happens. 

This is not to impugn books in which little happens! I love those books, which is why I tried to write one. As a teenager, I revered realist literary fiction, stories whose epiphanies emerged from quiet, interpersonal moments—stories that needed no pyrotechnics to move me as a reader. I wanted to write like that, and to be taken seriously in the way of those writers. I feared allegations of sentimentality, avoided melodrama, and wrote characters so faint that even my agent once delicately suggested that a protagonist “get a hobby.”

Of course, I was devastated when my novel-in-stories died on submission. After I recovered, though, I saw the truth of the feedback. Many writers do a beautiful job with subtle fiction. I just wasn’t one of them. I thought, too, of the books that shaped my brain as a young reader, like A Wrinkle of Time and His Dark Materials: epic science fiction and fantasy that introduced me to other worlds while also paying close attention to prose and character. What if I tried to write a book like that?

My first two novels are ultimately realist, though each has a speculative element. The Anatomy of Dreams follows two dream researchers working beneath a charismatic but ethically-questionable professor. In The Immortalists, four siblings visit a fortuneteller who claims to be able to tell anyone their date of death. But Under Story, in which a divorced couple discover a time-bending parallel universe, is the first time I committed fully to genre fiction.

I felt intimidated. To write about our world well is challenging enough; to write well about an imaginary world is a different, riddle-strewn gauntlet. There were so many issues to brainstorm, so many problems to solve and reversals to think through. By the end of the day, I was often so mentally exhausted that I struggled to think of words. But the process was thrilling, too. I wrote the first draft over five years, immersing myself in its worldbuilding, crosshatching real science with invented elements. I wanted to be meticulous enough that readers could give themselves permission to believe—to do a magic trick so airtight that it would feel real even to me.

But I didn’t want the worldbuilding to overshadow the heart of the novel: the story of a single couple’s grief and healing, their under story. In many ways, it’s the story of my healing from years of chronic pain, though there isn’t a migraine in the book. Still, Under Story is about the devastation of a life that breaks down and the miracle of the life that blooms from those ashes. It is a tribute to the fact that existence is always both/and, not either/or: pain and pleasure, loss and love.

In early interviews, I’ve been asked whether I received any pushback from my publisher about the cross-genre nature of the novel. I’m glad to be able to say that I haven’t. In the past, genre titles and authors were often shunted into discrete lanes—but I have the sense that this changing. Perhaps it has to do with the success of films like Christopher Nolan’s Inception or TV like Zal Batmanglij and Brit Marling’s The OA, both of which are high-concept and beautifully-executed. Or maybe it relates to the fact that the real world feels increasingly surreal, even genre-bending itself. Our political system vacillates between absurdism and horror. Developments in AI drag us, willingly or unwillingly, into a technological landscape that often feels like science fiction. (I am among the unwilling; I refuse to believe that my life would be better if I’d just outsource my mind.) In this context, science fiction and fantasy offer a mirror as well as a line of hope. Perhaps it isn’t too late to change our trajectory—and perhaps alternate visions of the world, and of the future, can give us ideas.

Below are some of the literary-leaning science fiction and fantasy titles that inspired me along the way.

*

Jorge Luis Borges, Ficciones

These fantastical stories have elements of many different genres, from the magical realism with which Borges is often associated to detective narratives. Borges is rigorously imaginative: I love the almost lawyerly intensity with which he argues his inventions, as though daring us not to believe him. In “Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius,” he lays out an “undocumented country” with a blend of intellectual intensity and sheer playfulness, from that country’s language (“There is no word corresponding to the noun moon, but there is a verb to moon or to moondle”) and views on literature (“The concept of plagiarism does not exist; it has been established that all books are the work of one single writer, who is timeless and anonymous”) to its phenomenon of hrönir (“secondary” versions of lost objects that spring into being “a little larger than the originals”) and theories about time: one school of thought “declares that the whole of time has already happened and that our life is a vague memory of dim reflection, doubtless false and fragmented, of an irrevocable process. Another school has it that the history of the universe, which contains the history of our lives and the most tenuous details of them, is the handwriting produced buy a minor god in order to communicate with a demon.” How can you not be alternately enlightened and delighted?

Ursula K. LeGuin, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”

I don’t know that a perfect novel exists (they are simply too big, too inherently textured), but I do believe that a perfect short story is possible, because “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” is one of them. At five pages, it is astoundingly economical and metaphorically genius: a fable about capitalism, to my mind, though you can read it in so many ways.

Ted Chiang, Stories of Your Life and Others

Ted Chiang’s short stories feel like thought experiments, each considered with exceptional meticulousness and integrity. They are scientifically engaged but not dry, morally curious but not pedantic. The titular novella at the heart of this collection (“Story of Your Life”) is one of my favorite pieces of writing… ever. As someone who is fascinated by aliens but continually frustrated by how often alien narratives end in war or violence, I was captivated by the way that Chiang braids time and language while imagining a new species. I still think of this piece as the gold standard when it comes to soulful science fiction.

Susanna Clarke, Piranesi and Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell

There is something I need to confess. The first time I started Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell, I stopped after seventy-five pages. Despite the fact that it had been emphatically recommend by friends who know my taste—and despite the fact that I loved the writing—I lost speed during a section on naval magic and feared that the rest of the book would have more military content than tends to hold my interest. Years later, though—after I fell in love with Piranesi, Clarke’s second novel—I knew that I had to give Strange & Norrell another chance. I can hardly stomach the thought of what I would have missed otherwise. This is a top-five-favorite novel for me; it is almost nine hundred pages, and I would have gladly read twice as many. Strange and Norrell is part political and academic satire, part sincere expression of belief in magic and mystery and art. It’s also technically dazzling, even risky (Jonathan Strange, not only a major but a titular character, is introduced after 200 pages—in a footnote), full of heart, and very funny.

Jeff VanderMeer, The Southern Reach Series

Vandermeer’s eerie series has been described as “eco-horror” and “cli-fi,” relatively new terms that reflect how current these books feel, despite their fantastical elements. They document investigations into the fictional Area X, a portion of American coastline where nature is behaving strangely. To say anything else would be to spoil the wild ride of this series, which is outrageously inventive, often trippy, and genuinely fresh. I’ve never read anything like it.

Mohsin Hamid, Exit West 

Exit West imagines the refugee crisis with a powerful magical realist twist. Saeed and Nadia live in an unnamed country tormented by civil war—and meanwhile, there are rumors of mysterious doors, portals that lead to other places. The fusing of realist horror with a fantastical device allows for a kind of prismatic re-seeing in the way of a parable. At the same time, Hamid employs a lightness of touch, and moments of humor, even when his characters are enduring the unendurable. Grief is always with these characters, but they have not allowed it to rob them of the capacity for other emotional experiences. When I finished Exit West, I thought of a famous line by Samuel Beckett—“I can’t go on, I’ll go on”—and how true it feels to human being.

Marina and Sergey Dyachenko, translated by Julia Meitov Hersey, Vita Nostra

My friend Brittany Cavallaro gives me some of the best book recommendations, because she knows that what I crave most is immersion. Reading Vita Nostra—written by a Ukrainian couple and set in Russia—means being immersed in a metaphysical magic school: rain and streetlights and clanking radiators, enigmatic professors and strange gold coins, overnight trains, the smell of damp leaves, mortal danger, and the kind of mind-bending that reminds you how little we know of reality after all. The novel follows teenager Sasha Samokhina’s matriculation at the Institute of Special Technologies. The Institute’s professors teach something utterly mystifying: for years, neither Sasha nor her classmates can figure out exactly what it is. While reading Vita Nostra, I felt like a fellow student at the Institute, studying their materials, experiencing my own metamorphosis. The full reveal is as satisfying as any fantasy concept I’ve encountered.

Kazuo Ishiguro, Never Let Me Go

My first novel, The Anatomy of Dreams, was inspired by this one. I was so arrested by Kathy’s voice—that sense of trouble under calm water, nostalgia pressured by melancholy—that some light turned on in my brain. I’ll be the first to say that Ishiguro did it better: Never Let Me Go explores issues of science, ethics, and creativity to heartbreaking effect. Ishiguro often blends literary and genre elements, from the off-kilter fantasy of THE BURIED GIANT to the noirish WHEN WE WERE ORPHANS. Indeed, the way he plays with memory makes it seem like a not-quite-realist genre of its own, wavy at the edges and unnervingly malleable.

Vandana Singh, Ambiguity Machines and Other Stories

Singh, also a physicist (!), was born in New Delhi, and in many of her stories, Indian myths and landscapes fuse with otherworldly ones. There is also a distinctly environmental lens that reminds me of Robin Wall Kimmerer: in one story, a newly-invented energy grid is based on fungal networks. Another story imagines a planet whose beings relate through the concept of kinship. Each story contains a novel’s worth of plot and character, and the prose is gorgeous—lush but precise, musical and surprising. For some reason, despite how deeply reading makes me feel, I rarely cry while doing it; but one of these short stories made me weep on the beach at a family vacation. Yet I find hope in them, too. “Requiem,” the final story in Ambiguity Machines, follows an anti-corporate uprising in which animals partner with humans. Singh’s collection reminds me that there is hope to be found in collectivity, and that imagination is as powerful a tool as any.

__________________________________

Under Story by Chloe Benjamin is available from Putnam.

 

Top of the World: The Legacy of Windows on the World by Katie Lee Kitchen

Windows on the World: Chef Michael Lomonaco on the Restaurant That Defined New York, Surviving 9/11, and Remembrance


This Week on All on the Table
Watch on 🍎Apple Podcast, 🎧Spotify, 📦Amazon, & ▶️YouTube

Top of the World: The Legacy of Windows on the World by Katie Lee Kitchen

Remembering the restaurant that was at the top of the World Trade Center

Read on Substack

Don’t forget to Subscribe for Updates.

Continue/Read See Original Article: https://katieleekitchen.substack.com/p/top-of-the-world-the-legacy-of-windows

A Century of Discoveries: Genealogy at The Seattle Public Library

0

Read More

Every day, visitors ride the elevators to Level 9 of Seattle’s Central Library looking for family stories. Some are tracing immigrant ancestors. Others are searching for military records, newspaper clippings, or clues to a long-standing family mystery.

In 2026, The Seattle Public Library’s genealogy collection marks 100 years of helping people uncover their family stories. Its history began with a small deposit of donated books and grew through the work of generations of librarians, support staff, volunteers, and family historians.

Photo of women with long wavy blond hair, wire-rimmed glasses and a green sweater
“Finding Your Roots” DNA detective CeCe Moore will lead a day-long session at the Central Library on Oct. 3 in honor of the genealogy collection’s 100th anniversary.

We’re celebrating this milestone with two day-long programs. On Saturday, Sept. 19, four nationally recognized genealogy experts will share insights into the evolving practice of genealogy. On Saturday, Oct. 3, “DNA Detective” CeCe Moore, the famed genetic genealogist on PBS’s “Finding Your Roots,” will share stories from her pioneering career, including cold cases in the Pacific Northwest.

We’re also celebrating by sharing the unique history of this collection and the people who have guided it.

Genealogy collection beginnings

In 1926, the newly formed Seattle Genealogical Society partnered with the Library to make the Society’s collection available to everyone. Its first 129 volumes found a home in the old Carnegie Central Library. Other lineage societies and individuals soon contributed books and financial support, helping the collection grow through donations, shared resources, and community partnerships.

When librarian Carol Lind joined the staff in September 1949, she recognized that researchers needed specialized assistance and took a leading role in developing the collection. She was deeply involved with the Seattle Genealogical Society, serving on its board during her years at the Library. Under her leadership, the Library expanded its holdings and accepted a major transfer of genealogy materials from the Washington State Library in 1952, establishing Seattle as a statewide center for genealogical reference service.

“Silent Butlers”: The index cards that keep on giving

Long before online catalogs and searchable databases, Lind and her associates created thousands of detailed index cards pointing researchers to names buried deep within county histories, family genealogies, local histories, and other reference works. Lind affectionately called these cards her “silent butlers” because they quietly guided visitors to information they might never have discovered on their own.

Photo of a row of index card drawers, with one drawer pulled it and yellowing index cards showing. Above it is a sign that says "Genealogy Card Index."
The Seattle Public Library’s first genealogy librarian, Carol Lind, created thousands of detailed index cards pointing researchers to names buried deep within county histories, family genealogies, local histories, and other reference works. The index is still on Level 9 and available for use.

Her practical, hands-on approach made family history approachable for anyone who walked into the library. As Lind explained:

“Each beginner is given a pedigree chart and asked to fill out what he knows or believes (in pencil) and we work from this information.”

Success in genealogy often comes from small discoveries: a name tucked into a county history, a brief newspaper notice, a church register, or an unexpected record that opens the door to an entirely new branch of a family tree. Lind’s painstaking indexes helped generations of researchers make those discoveries. Those index cards are still available to researchers today.

Four Decades of Growth

When Darlene Hamilton joined the Library in April 1971, she spent about a month working alongside Carol Lind before Lind retired in May. Hamilton then assumed leadership of the genealogy collection, beginning a 40-year tenure as Lead Genealogy Librarian. She continued and expanded Lind’s card-indexing work into the 1990s and served on the Seattle Genealogical Society Board throughout her time at the Library. During her tenure, the collection continued to grow through donations, community partnerships, and new purchases, while genealogy research itself was transformed by the arrival of electronic catalogs, online databases, and digitized resources. As interest in genealogy surged around the U.S. Bicentennial and the television adaptation of “Roots,” Hamilton welcomed a new generation of family historians eager to explore their own stories.

Photo of two women, one wearing a coat, with white hair and glasses. One wearing a white turtleneck and a Seattle Public Library badge.
The Library’s first genealogy librarians Carol Lind (left) and Darlene Hamilton, taken at the 100th anniversary of The Seattle Public Library in 1991.

Hamilton secured federal grant funding that strengthened genealogy services across Washington state and launched public classes that introduced beginners to research techniques. She also expanded the collection to better document communities whose histories had often been overlooked, making genealogy resources more representative of the Pacific Northwest’s diverse past.

People and Place

For many years, dedicated library associates provided vital support alongside the lead genealogy librarian. In 1999, that support position was formally converted into a professional librarian role, filled by Heather McLeland-Wieser, creating a two-librarian genealogy team. When the iconic Central Library opened in 2004, the genealogy collection moved to its current home on Level 9. Today, genealogy librarians Mahina Oshie and John LaMont oversee the Library’s genealogy collection.

Photo of two people standing between two library bookshelves, pulling books off the shelves.
John Lamont and Mahina Oshie are the Library’s two genealogy librarians.

Level 9 is a working research space as much as it is a place to browse. The floor is shared with the History, Travel & Maps Department, whose collections also include biography. The reference desk sits with the Central Library’s atrium behind it, facing the gently sloping floor of the book spiral and the collections beyond. Long tables and computers provide space for research, while microfilm readers and vertical files offer resources that can’t simply be found online.

One-on-one research help has long been part of genealogy services at the Library. Lind and Hamilton both provided personal guidance to researchers at the reference desk, a tradition that continues today in person and through virtual appointments.

A Collection in Motion

Technology has transformed genealogy, and the collection has evolved with it. Becoming a FamilySearch Affiliate Library in 2014 gave Library users expanded access to FamilySearch’s digitized historical records and resources.

The Library continues to strengthen the collection through ongoing purchases supported by The Seattle Public Library Foundation, individual donations, and community partnerships. When the Seattle Genealogical Society relocated to Wallingford, the Library welcomed more than 1,700 unique books and an extensive collection of genealogy periodicals.

In its centennial year, the collection continues to evolve. Staff have been working on a major project to reorganize the genealogy collection so that materials from the same geographic areas — countries, states, and counties — are shelved together rather than separated across different Dewey classifications. The goal is simple: help researchers spend less time searching the stacks and more time making discoveries.

The tools have changed dramatically over the past century, but genealogy research can still be wonderfully physical: pulling one book from a shelf, then another; following a reference to a source you hadn’t considered; finding a name buried in an index; or asking a librarian a question that leads somewhere unexpected. Index cards have given way to digitized archives, online databases, and global research networks, but the patience, curiosity, and careful research that lead to a family discovery remain much the same.

Whether you’re beginning your first family tree, trying to break through a long-standing brick wall, or simply curious about the people who came before you, the Genealogy Collection on Level 9 offers a place to begin.

Sometimes the guide is an index card. Sometimes it’s an online database, a century-old newspaper, a book pulled from a shelf, or a librarian who knows just where to look next.

The silent butlers are still at work.

 

You Asked. We Listened. New Solo Study Spaces Available.

0

Read More

Two soundproof booths next to each other in a library
These soundproof booths on the first floor of Perkins Library have proven so popular with Duke students that we’ve added another one on the third floor, plus six additional reservable carrels on Perkins 4.

We heard you loud and clear in our 2026 Libraries Student Satisfaction Survey: Duke students want more quiet individual study spaces. So we’re making it happen.

Perkins Library now has 7 new solo study spaces available for students, bringing our total number of solo study spaces to 14. These spaces are 1-person rooms, ideal for virtual interviews, online classes, and getting focused work done without interruptions or distractions.

Where can I find the solo study spaces?

All of the solo study spaces are located in Perkins Library, floors 1-4:

Perkins Floor 1
  • Soundproof Booths 1-2 (located near Perkins Room 118)
  • Perkins Interview Room 130 (picture below, includes a telephone with dedicated landline)

Perkins Floor 2
  • Perkins Carrels 221-224
Perkins Floor 3
  • Soundproof Booth 3 (visible from Duke Life Room and drinking fountain)
Perkins Floor 4
  • Perkins Carrels 420A-420F (centermost carrel suite on the floor)

How can I reserve one?

All of these solo spaces are kept unlocked and can be booked for up to 90 minutes per day online from the Libraries Find Library Spaces webpage or can be used on a drop-in basis if unbooked.

The post You Asked. We Listened. New Solo Study Spaces Available. appeared first on Duke University Libraries Blogs.

 

Jonathan V. Last: How Much Stupid Can We Possibly Take?

0

Read More

Thom Tillis was the pivotal vote to confirm a buffoon to run the Department of Defense, and now he’s shocked about Hegseth’s incompetency. JD wants everyone to know he’s a Catholic now, but he doesn’t seem to have absorbed even the basic teachings of Catholicism. And Susan Collins claims she has influence with her Senate colleagues over Trump’s agenda—even though on almost every occasion she has made sure that her vote won’t matter. Meanwhile, Trump did a coup in Venezuela with an associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Plus: Tim reads from the mailbag, Trump is repulsed by Ken Paxton, the Antichrist might be walking amongst us, and what would happen if armed, leftwing activists created a sanctuary space in Ohio to protect Haitian immigrants?

JVL joins Tim Miller.

Leave a comment

show notes:

Bulwark LIVE: GOOD FIGHT TOUR with Tim, Sarah, Sam and JVL is coming to the Southeast in October. Tickets are on sale NOW. Head to TheBulwark.com/Events for details and to get your tickets.

As always: Watch, listen, hit the like button or leave a comment. We want to hear from you.

Ad-free editions of The Bulwark Daily are available exclusively for Bulwark+ members.

Join now

Tim Miller’s Bulwark Daily is available wherever you get podcasts and on YouTube. New shows drop each weekday afternoon. If you like the show, leave a comment and ⭐⭐⭐⭐ wherever you listen. Add The Bulwark Daily to your player of choice, here.


Read more